From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
To: "Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Cc: "stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/2] libnvdimm: Use max contiguous area for namespace size
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 14:54:53 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180720205453.GA4864@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1532119565.10343.15.camel@intel.com>
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 01:46:06PM -0700, Verma, Vishal L wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2018-07-12 at 09:47 -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > This patch will find the max contiguous area to determine the largest
> > pmem namespace size that can be created. If the requested size exceeds
> > the largest available, ENOSPC error will be returned.
> >
> > This fixes the allocation underrun error and wrong error return code
> > that have otherwise been observed as the following kernel warning:
> >
> > WARNING: CPU: <CPU> PID: <PID> at drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c:913 size_store
> >
> > Fixes: a1f3e4d6a0c3 ("libnvdimm, region: update nd_region_available_dpa() for multi-pmem support")
> > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
>
> Hi Keith,
>
> I was testing these patches and I found:
>
> When booting a VM which has both, a qemu ACPI.NFIT bus, and nfit_test
> buses, initially the nfit_test buses show correct max_available_extent.
> But the qemu ACPI.NFIT bus regions (which have an automatic full-
> capacity namespace created on them when they come up) show
> max_available_extent of the full region size, even as the
> available_size attr is zero.
The max extents only counts the free pmem that it can reserve.
We shouldn't have been able to reserve non-free pmem, so it sounds like
something must be wrong with how the resources were set up.
I'll make a similar qemu config and see why/if the resource was
considered free.
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
To: "Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Cc: "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com" <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
"Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/2] libnvdimm: Use max contiguous area for namespace size
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 14:54:53 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180720205453.GA4864@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1532119565.10343.15.camel@intel.com>
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 01:46:06PM -0700, Verma, Vishal L wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2018-07-12 at 09:47 -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > This patch will find the max contiguous area to determine the largest
> > pmem namespace size that can be created. If the requested size exceeds
> > the largest available, ENOSPC error will be returned.
> >
> > This fixes the allocation underrun error and wrong error return code
> > that have otherwise been observed as the following kernel warning:
> >
> > WARNING: CPU: <CPU> PID: <PID> at drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c:913 size_store
> >
> > Fixes: a1f3e4d6a0c3 ("libnvdimm, region: update nd_region_available_dpa() for multi-pmem support")
> > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
>
> Hi Keith,
>
> I was testing these patches and I found:
>
> When booting a VM which has both, a qemu ACPI.NFIT bus, and nfit_test
> buses, initially the nfit_test buses show correct max_available_extent.
> But the qemu ACPI.NFIT bus regions (which have an automatic full-
> capacity namespace created on them when they come up) show
> max_available_extent of the full region size, even as the
> available_size attr is zero.
The max extents only counts the free pmem that it can reserve.
We shouldn't have been able to reserve non-free pmem, so it sounds like
something must be wrong with how the resources were set up.
I'll make a similar qemu config and see why/if the resource was
considered free.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-20 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-12 15:47 [PATCHv3 1/2] libnvdimm: Use max contiguous area for namespace size Keith Busch
2018-07-12 15:47 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-12 15:47 ` [PATCHv3 2/2] libnvdimm: Export max available extent Keith Busch
2018-07-20 20:46 ` [PATCHv3 1/2] libnvdimm: Use max contiguous area for namespace size Verma, Vishal L
2018-07-20 20:46 ` Verma, Vishal L
2018-07-20 20:54 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2018-07-20 20:54 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-20 21:48 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-20 21:48 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-20 23:17 ` Verma, Vishal L
2018-07-20 23:17 ` Verma, Vishal L
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180720205453.GA4864@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.