From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
To: "Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Cc: "stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/2] libnvdimm: Use max contiguous area for namespace size
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 15:48:39 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180720214838.GB4864@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1532119565.10343.15.camel@intel.com>
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 01:46:06PM -0700, Verma, Vishal L wrote:
> $ cat /sys/bus/nd/devices/region1/max_available_extent
> 17045651456
>
> $ ndctl list -BNR --region=region1
> [
> {
> "provider":"ACPI.NFIT",
> "dev":"ndbus1",
> "regions":[
> {
> "dev":"region1",
> "size":17045651456,
> "available_size":0,
> "type":"pmem",
> "numa_node":0,
> "persistence_domain":"unknown",
> "namespaces":[
> {
> "dev":"namespace1.0",
> "mode":"raw",
> "size":17045651456,
> "sector_size":512,
> "blockdev":"pmem1",
> "numa_node":0
> }
> ...
>
As we saw, getting the "available_size" directly from the the region's
sysfs entry also returned the same as max extent:
$ cat /sys/bus/nd/devices/region1/available_size
17045651456
The reason ndctl shows available_size as '0' is because the nstype is
neither of type PMEM nor BLK.
So I think max_available_extent is doing the right thing.
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
To: "Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Cc: "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com" <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
"Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/2] libnvdimm: Use max contiguous area for namespace size
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 15:48:39 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180720214838.GB4864@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1532119565.10343.15.camel@intel.com>
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 01:46:06PM -0700, Verma, Vishal L wrote:
> $ cat /sys/bus/nd/devices/region1/max_available_extent
> 17045651456
>
> $ ndctl list -BNR --region=region1
> [
> {
> "provider":"ACPI.NFIT",
> "dev":"ndbus1",
> "regions":[
> {
> "dev":"region1",
> "size":17045651456,
> "available_size":0,
> "type":"pmem",
> "numa_node":0,
> "persistence_domain":"unknown",
> "namespaces":[
> {
> "dev":"namespace1.0",
> "mode":"raw",
> "size":17045651456,
> "sector_size":512,
> "blockdev":"pmem1",
> "numa_node":0
> }
> ...
>
As we saw, getting the "available_size" directly from the the region's
sysfs entry also returned the same as max extent:
$ cat /sys/bus/nd/devices/region1/available_size
17045651456
The reason ndctl shows available_size as '0' is because the nstype is
neither of type PMEM nor BLK.
So I think max_available_extent is doing the right thing.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-20 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-12 15:47 [PATCHv3 1/2] libnvdimm: Use max contiguous area for namespace size Keith Busch
2018-07-12 15:47 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-12 15:47 ` [PATCHv3 2/2] libnvdimm: Export max available extent Keith Busch
2018-07-20 20:46 ` [PATCHv3 1/2] libnvdimm: Use max contiguous area for namespace size Verma, Vishal L
2018-07-20 20:46 ` Verma, Vishal L
2018-07-20 20:54 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-20 20:54 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-20 21:48 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2018-07-20 21:48 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-20 23:17 ` Verma, Vishal L
2018-07-20 23:17 ` Verma, Vishal L
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180720214838.GB4864@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.