From: "Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
To: "Busch, Keith" <keith.busch@intel.com>
Cc: "stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/2] libnvdimm: Use max contiguous area for namespace size
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 23:17:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1532128622.10343.28.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180720214838.GB4864@localhost.localdomain>
On Fri, 2018-07-20 at 15:48 -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 01:46:06PM -0700, Verma, Vishal L wrote:
> > $ cat /sys/bus/nd/devices/region1/max_available_extent
> > 17045651456
> >
> > $ ndctl list -BNR --region=region1
> > [
> > {
> > "provider":"ACPI.NFIT",
> > "dev":"ndbus1",
> > "regions":[
> > {
> > "dev":"region1",
> > "size":17045651456,
> > "available_size":0,
> > "type":"pmem",
> > "numa_node":0,
> > "persistence_domain":"unknown",
> > "namespaces":[
> > {
> > "dev":"namespace1.0",
> > "mode":"raw",
> > "size":17045651456,
> > "sector_size":512,
> > "blockdev":"pmem1",
> > "numa_node":0
> > }
> > ...
> >
>
> As we saw, getting the "available_size" directly from the the
> region's
> sysfs entry also returned the same as max extent:
>
> $ cat /sys/bus/nd/devices/region1/available_size
> 17045651456
>
> The reason ndctl shows available_size as '0' is because the nstype is
> neither of type PMEM nor BLK.
>
> So I think max_available_extent is doing the right thing.
Yep, I agree. I did however see another potential breakage (the blk-
exhaust unit test fails due to this)
ndctl create-namespace --bus=nfit_test.0
creates a namespace on say region 3. That makes available_size for
region3 zero (as reported by ndctl-list as well as directly from
sysfs), but max_available_extent still shows the full size available.
$ sudo ndctl create-namespace --bus=nfit_test.0
{
"dev":"namespace3.0",
"mode":"fsdax",
"map":"dev",
"size":"28.50 MiB (29.89 MB)",
"uuid":"592071ed-0928-4be8-96fb-4be944e4c6f4",
"raw_uuid":"c4ac44fa-d3bd-43ea-9a1a-3a083d9fed1d",
"sector_size":512,
"blockdev":"pmem3"
}
$ cat /sys/bus/nd/devices/region3/max_available_extent
33554432
$ cat /sys/bus/nd/devices/region3/available_size
0
And then a subsequent
ndctl create-namespace --bus=nfit_test.0
sees the max_available extent on region 3 (with the corresponding ndctl
patches for this applied), tries to create a namespace again there, and
obviously fails.
As a side note, I think it may be useful to include in the related
ndctl patch, a json entry for the max_available_extent for region
listings.
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
To: "Busch, Keith" <keith.busch@intel.com>
Cc: "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com" <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
"Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/2] libnvdimm: Use max contiguous area for namespace size
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 23:17:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1532128622.10343.28.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180720214838.GB4864@localhost.localdomain>
On Fri, 2018-07-20 at 15:48 -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 01:46:06PM -0700, Verma, Vishal L wrote:
> > $ cat /sys/bus/nd/devices/region1/max_available_extent
> > 17045651456
> >
> > $ ndctl list -BNR --region=region1
> > [
> > {
> > "provider":"ACPI.NFIT",
> > "dev":"ndbus1",
> > "regions":[
> > {
> > "dev":"region1",
> > "size":17045651456,
> > "available_size":0,
> > "type":"pmem",
> > "numa_node":0,
> > "persistence_domain":"unknown",
> > "namespaces":[
> > {
> > "dev":"namespace1.0",
> > "mode":"raw",
> > "size":17045651456,
> > "sector_size":512,
> > "blockdev":"pmem1",
> > "numa_node":0
> > }
> > ...
> >
>
> As we saw, getting the "available_size" directly from the the
> region's
> sysfs entry also returned the same as max extent:
>
> $ cat /sys/bus/nd/devices/region1/available_size
> 17045651456
>
> The reason ndctl shows available_size as '0' is because the nstype is
> neither of type PMEM nor BLK.
>
> So I think max_available_extent is doing the right thing.
Yep, I agree. I did however see another potential breakage (the blk-
exhaust unit test fails due to this)
ndctl create-namespace --bus=nfit_test.0
creates a namespace on say region 3. That makes available_size for
region3 zero (as reported by ndctl-list as well as directly from
sysfs), but max_available_extent still shows the full size available.
$ sudo ndctl create-namespace --bus=nfit_test.0
{
"dev":"namespace3.0",
"mode":"fsdax",
"map":"dev",
"size":"28.50 MiB (29.89 MB)",
"uuid":"592071ed-0928-4be8-96fb-4be944e4c6f4",
"raw_uuid":"c4ac44fa-d3bd-43ea-9a1a-3a083d9fed1d",
"sector_size":512,
"blockdev":"pmem3"
}
$ cat /sys/bus/nd/devices/region3/max_available_extent
33554432
$ cat /sys/bus/nd/devices/region3/available_size
0
And then a subsequent
ndctl create-namespace --bus=nfit_test.0
sees the max_available extent on region 3 (with the corresponding ndctl
patches for this applied), tries to create a namespace again there, and
obviously fails.
As a side note, I think it may be useful to include in the related
ndctl patch, a json entry for the max_available_extent for region
listings.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-20 23:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-12 15:47 [PATCHv3 1/2] libnvdimm: Use max contiguous area for namespace size Keith Busch
2018-07-12 15:47 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-12 15:47 ` [PATCHv3 2/2] libnvdimm: Export max available extent Keith Busch
2018-07-20 20:46 ` [PATCHv3 1/2] libnvdimm: Use max contiguous area for namespace size Verma, Vishal L
2018-07-20 20:46 ` Verma, Vishal L
2018-07-20 20:54 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-20 20:54 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-20 21:48 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-20 21:48 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-20 23:17 ` Verma, Vishal L [this message]
2018-07-20 23:17 ` Verma, Vishal L
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1532128622.10343.28.camel@intel.com \
--to=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.