From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH 0/4] More accurate PHC<->system clock synchronization
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 19:25:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181031022555.ghpm7654n5jp43uq@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181026162742.631-1-mlichvar@redhat.com>
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 06:27:38PM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> The other patches add support for the new ioctl to the e1000e, igb,
> and ixgbe driver. Tests with few different NICs in different machines
> (and PCIe slots) show that:
> - with an I219 (e1000e) the measured delay improved from 2500 to 1300 ns
> and the error in the measured offset, when compared to cross
> timestamping, was reduced by a factor of 5
> - with an I210 (igb) the delay improved from 5100 to 1700 ns
> - with an I350 (igb) the delay improved from 2300 to 750 ns
> - with an X550 (ixgbe) the delay improved from 1950 to 650 ns
Nice work! This is a welcome improvement.
Thanks,
Richard
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
To: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] More accurate PHC<->system clock synchronization
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 19:25:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181031022555.ghpm7654n5jp43uq@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181026162742.631-1-mlichvar@redhat.com>
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 06:27:38PM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> The other patches add support for the new ioctl to the e1000e, igb,
> and ixgbe driver. Tests with few different NICs in different machines
> (and PCIe slots) show that:
> - with an I219 (e1000e) the measured delay improved from 2500 to 1300 ns
> and the error in the measured offset, when compared to cross
> timestamping, was reduced by a factor of 5
> - with an I210 (igb) the delay improved from 5100 to 1700 ns
> - with an I350 (igb) the delay improved from 2300 to 750 ns
> - with an X550 (ixgbe) the delay improved from 1950 to 650 ns
Nice work! This is a welcome improvement.
Thanks,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-31 2:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-26 16:27 [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH 0/4] More accurate PHC<->system clock synchronization Miroslav Lichvar
2018-10-26 16:27 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2018-10-26 16:27 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH 1/4] ptp: add PTP_SYS_OFFSET_EXTENDED ioctl Miroslav Lichvar
2018-10-26 16:27 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2018-10-26 22:16 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vinicius Costa Gomes
2018-10-26 22:16 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2018-10-29 12:52 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2018-10-29 12:52 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2018-10-31 2:23 ` Richard Cochran
2018-10-31 2:23 ` Richard Cochran
2018-10-31 3:01 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Richard Cochran
2018-10-31 3:01 ` Richard Cochran
2018-10-26 16:27 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH 2/4] e1000e: add support for extended PHC gettime Miroslav Lichvar
2018-10-26 16:27 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2018-10-26 16:27 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH 3/4] igb: " Miroslav Lichvar
2018-10-26 16:27 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2018-10-31 2:29 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Richard Cochran
2018-10-31 2:29 ` Richard Cochran
2018-10-31 9:39 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Miroslav Lichvar
2018-10-31 9:39 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2018-10-31 16:56 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Keller, Jacob E
2018-10-31 16:56 ` Keller, Jacob E
2018-10-26 16:27 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH 4/4] ixgbe: " Miroslav Lichvar
2018-10-26 16:27 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2018-10-26 16:54 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Keller, Jacob E
2018-10-26 16:54 ` Keller, Jacob E
2018-10-29 13:31 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Miroslav Lichvar
2018-10-29 13:31 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2018-10-29 16:02 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Keller, Jacob E
2018-10-29 16:02 ` Keller, Jacob E
2018-10-31 14:40 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Richard Cochran
2018-10-31 14:40 ` Richard Cochran
2018-10-31 14:49 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Miroslav Lichvar
2018-10-31 14:49 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2018-10-31 21:16 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Richard Cochran
2018-10-31 21:16 ` Richard Cochran
2018-10-31 22:08 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Keller, Jacob E
2018-10-31 22:08 ` Keller, Jacob E
2018-10-31 16:55 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Keller, Jacob E
2018-10-31 16:55 ` Keller, Jacob E
2018-10-26 16:40 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH 0/4] More accurate PHC<->system clock synchronization Keller, Jacob E
2018-10-26 16:40 ` Keller, Jacob E
2018-10-26 16:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Keller, Jacob E
2018-10-26 16:51 ` Keller, Jacob E
2018-10-31 2:25 ` Richard Cochran [this message]
2018-10-31 2:25 ` Richard Cochran
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181031022555.ghpm7654n5jp43uq@localhost \
--to=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.