From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Eugene Syromyatnikov <esyr@redhat.com>,
Elvira Khabirova <lineprinter@altlinux.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] powerpc/ptrace: replace ptrace_report_syscall() with a tracehook call
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 18:42:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181207154255.GA28964@altlinux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y391k2tq.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2035 bytes --]
On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 10:12:49PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org> writes:
> > On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 06:18:23AM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> >> From: Elvira Khabirova <lineprinter@altlinux.org>
> >>
> >> Arch code should use tracehook_*() helpers, as documented
> >> in include/linux/tracehook.h,
> >> ptrace_report_syscall() is not expected to be used outside that file.
> >>
> >> Co-authored-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org>
> >> Fixes: 5521eb4bca2d ("powerpc/ptrace: Add support for PTRACE_SYSEMU")
> >> Signed-off-by: Elvira Khabirova <lineprinter@altlinux.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org>
> >> ---
> >> v4: rewritten to call tracehook_report_syscall_entry() once, compile-tested
> >> v3: add a descriptive comment
> >> v2: explicitly ignore tracehook_report_syscall_entry() return code
> >>
> >> arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> >> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >
> > Sorry, this patch does not work, please ignore it.
>
> Hmm OK. Why exactly?
Unfortunately, I have no idea why it doesn't work.
All I can say is it breaks strace because the kernel no longer sends
syscall entry stops.
> I wrote more or less the same patch, although I used a temporary bool.
>
> > However, the bug blocks PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO, so please fix it.
>
> Sorry, didn't realise it was blocking you.
We are changing ptrace_report_syscall signature to implement
PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO, and this is the only place in the kernel besides
tracehook_report_syscall_*() that invokes ptrace_report_syscall() directly.
> > I'm going to use
> > if (tracehook_report_syscall_entry(regs))
> > return -1;
> > return -1;
> > in the series until you have a better fix.
>
> Yeah that's fine by me. I could send that to Linus for 4.20 if you want
> me to, otherwise I'm fine for you to carry it in your series.
Yes, please. I'll send a v5 shortly.
--
ldv
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Eugene Syromyatnikov <esyr@redhat.com>,
Elvira Khabirova <lineprinter@altlinux.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] powerpc/ptrace: replace ptrace_report_syscall() with a tracehook call
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 18:42:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181207154255.GA28964@altlinux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y391k2tq.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2035 bytes --]
On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 10:12:49PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org> writes:
> > On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 06:18:23AM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> >> From: Elvira Khabirova <lineprinter@altlinux.org>
> >>
> >> Arch code should use tracehook_*() helpers, as documented
> >> in include/linux/tracehook.h,
> >> ptrace_report_syscall() is not expected to be used outside that file.
> >>
> >> Co-authored-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org>
> >> Fixes: 5521eb4bca2d ("powerpc/ptrace: Add support for PTRACE_SYSEMU")
> >> Signed-off-by: Elvira Khabirova <lineprinter@altlinux.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org>
> >> ---
> >> v4: rewritten to call tracehook_report_syscall_entry() once, compile-tested
> >> v3: add a descriptive comment
> >> v2: explicitly ignore tracehook_report_syscall_entry() return code
> >>
> >> arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> >> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >
> > Sorry, this patch does not work, please ignore it.
>
> Hmm OK. Why exactly?
Unfortunately, I have no idea why it doesn't work.
All I can say is it breaks strace because the kernel no longer sends
syscall entry stops.
> I wrote more or less the same patch, although I used a temporary bool.
>
> > However, the bug blocks PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO, so please fix it.
>
> Sorry, didn't realise it was blocking you.
We are changing ptrace_report_syscall signature to implement
PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO, and this is the only place in the kernel besides
tracehook_report_syscall_*() that invokes ptrace_report_syscall() directly.
> > I'm going to use
> > if (tracehook_report_syscall_entry(regs))
> > return -1;
> > return -1;
> > in the series until you have a better fix.
>
> Yeah that's fine by me. I could send that to Linus for 4.20 if you want
> me to, otherwise I'm fine for you to carry it in your series.
Yes, please. I'll send a v5 shortly.
--
ldv
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-07 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-16 11:17 [PATCH v2] powerpc/ptrace: replace ptrace_report_syscall() with a tracehook call Elvira Khabirova
2018-11-16 11:17 ` Elvira Khabirova
2018-11-16 12:42 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-11-16 12:42 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-11-19 21:01 ` [PATCH v3] " Dmitry V. Levin
2018-11-19 21:01 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-11-21 21:17 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-11-21 21:17 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-12-03 3:18 ` [PATCH v4] " Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-03 3:18 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-07 1:19 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-07 1:19 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-07 11:12 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-12-07 11:12 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-12-07 15:42 ` Dmitry V. Levin [this message]
2018-12-07 15:42 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-07 15:56 ` [PATCH v5] " Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-07 15:56 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-07 18:52 ` [PATCH v6] " Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-07 18:52 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-10 13:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-12-10 13:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-12-10 13:36 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-10 13:36 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-16 17:28 ` [PATCH] powerpc/ptrace: cleanup do_syscall_trace_enter Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-17 11:20 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-12-17 11:23 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-17 11:23 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-17 11:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-12-17 11:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-12-22 9:54 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-12-11 13:45 ` [v5] powerpc/ptrace: replace ptrace_report_syscall() with a tracehook call Michael Ellerman
2018-12-11 13:45 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-12-07 16:34 ` [PATCH v4] " Oleg Nesterov
2018-12-07 16:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-12-07 18:42 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-07 18:42 ` Dmitry V. Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181207154255.GA28964@altlinux.org \
--to=ldv@altlinux.org \
--cc=esyr@redhat.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=lineprinter@altlinux.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.