From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Eugene Syromyatnikov <esyr@redhat.com>,
Elvira Khabirova <lineprinter@altlinux.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc/ptrace: replace ptrace_report_syscall() with a tracehook call
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 08:17:25 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87efbe166y.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181119210139.GA8360@altlinux.org>
Hi Dmitry,
Thanks for the patch.
"Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org> writes:
> From: Elvira Khabirova <lineprinter@altlinux.org>
>
> Arch code should use tracehook_*() helpers as documented
> in include/linux/tracehook.h,
> ptrace_report_syscall() is not expected to be used outside that file.
>
> Co-authored-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org>
> Fixes: 5521eb4bca2d ("powerpc/ptrace: Add support for PTRACE_SYSEMU")
> Signed-off-by: Elvira Khabirova <lineprinter@altlinux.org>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org>
> ---
>
> v3: add a descriptive comment
> v2: explicitly ignore tracehook_report_syscall_entry() return code
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
> index afb819f4ca68..e84220d91bbd 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
> @@ -3266,7 +3266,12 @@ long do_syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
> user_exit();
>
> if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_EMU)) {
> - ptrace_report_syscall(regs);
> + /*
> + * A nonzero return code from tracehook_report_syscall_entry()
> + * tells us to prevent the syscall execution, but we are not
> + * going to execute it anyway.
> + */
> + (void) tracehook_report_syscall_entry(regs);
Unfortunately the (void) cast doesn't work to suppress the must check
warning.
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c:3274:3: error: ignoring return value of 'tracehook_report_syscall_entry', declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Werror=unused-result]
AFAIK we don't have a way to suppress that.
I guess we should rewrite it to only call
tracehook_report_syscall_entry() once, like x86 does.
I'll try and get a patch for that done & tested.
cheers
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Eugene Syromyatnikov <esyr@redhat.com>,
Elvira Khabirova <lineprinter@altlinux.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc/ptrace: replace ptrace_report_syscall() with a tracehook call
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 08:17:25 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87efbe166y.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181119210139.GA8360@altlinux.org>
Hi Dmitry,
Thanks for the patch.
"Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org> writes:
> From: Elvira Khabirova <lineprinter@altlinux.org>
>
> Arch code should use tracehook_*() helpers as documented
> in include/linux/tracehook.h,
> ptrace_report_syscall() is not expected to be used outside that file.
>
> Co-authored-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org>
> Fixes: 5521eb4bca2d ("powerpc/ptrace: Add support for PTRACE_SYSEMU")
> Signed-off-by: Elvira Khabirova <lineprinter@altlinux.org>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org>
> ---
>
> v3: add a descriptive comment
> v2: explicitly ignore tracehook_report_syscall_entry() return code
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
> index afb819f4ca68..e84220d91bbd 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
> @@ -3266,7 +3266,12 @@ long do_syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
> user_exit();
>
> if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_EMU)) {
> - ptrace_report_syscall(regs);
> + /*
> + * A nonzero return code from tracehook_report_syscall_entry()
> + * tells us to prevent the syscall execution, but we are not
> + * going to execute it anyway.
> + */
> + (void) tracehook_report_syscall_entry(regs);
Unfortunately the (void) cast doesn't work to suppress the must check
warning.
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c:3274:3: error: ignoring return value of 'tracehook_report_syscall_entry', declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Werror=unused-result]
AFAIK we don't have a way to suppress that.
I guess we should rewrite it to only call
tracehook_report_syscall_entry() once, like x86 does.
I'll try and get a patch for that done & tested.
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-21 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-16 11:17 [PATCH v2] powerpc/ptrace: replace ptrace_report_syscall() with a tracehook call Elvira Khabirova
2018-11-16 11:17 ` Elvira Khabirova
2018-11-16 12:42 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-11-16 12:42 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-11-19 21:01 ` [PATCH v3] " Dmitry V. Levin
2018-11-19 21:01 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-11-21 21:17 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2018-11-21 21:17 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-12-03 3:18 ` [PATCH v4] " Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-03 3:18 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-07 1:19 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-07 1:19 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-07 11:12 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-12-07 11:12 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-12-07 15:42 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-07 15:42 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-07 15:56 ` [PATCH v5] " Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-07 15:56 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-07 18:52 ` [PATCH v6] " Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-07 18:52 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-10 13:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-12-10 13:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-12-10 13:36 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-10 13:36 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-16 17:28 ` [PATCH] powerpc/ptrace: cleanup do_syscall_trace_enter Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-17 11:20 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-12-17 11:23 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-17 11:23 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-17 11:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-12-17 11:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-12-22 9:54 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-12-11 13:45 ` [v5] powerpc/ptrace: replace ptrace_report_syscall() with a tracehook call Michael Ellerman
2018-12-11 13:45 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-12-07 16:34 ` [PATCH v4] " Oleg Nesterov
2018-12-07 16:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-12-07 18:42 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-07 18:42 ` Dmitry V. Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87efbe166y.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=esyr@redhat.com \
--cc=ldv@altlinux.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=lineprinter@altlinux.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.