All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: "open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
	"andrew@lunn.ch" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"moderated list:ETHERNET BRIDGE"
	<bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"vivien.didelot@gmail.com" <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 7/9] net: bridge: Stop calling switchdev_port_attr_get()
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 11:20:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190214112002.GA8698@splinter> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190213220638.1552-8-f.fainelli@gmail.com>

On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 02:06:36PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Now that all switchdev drivers have been converted to checking the
> bridge port flags during the prepare phase of the
> switchdev_port_attr_set() when the process
> SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS, we can avoid calling
> switchdev_port_attr_get() with
> SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS_SUPPORT.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> ---
>  net/bridge/br_switchdev.c | 16 +++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c b/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
> index db9e8ab96d48..8f88f8a1a7fa 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
> @@ -64,29 +64,27 @@ int br_switchdev_set_port_flag(struct net_bridge_port *p,
>  {
>  	struct switchdev_attr attr = {
>  		.orig_dev = p->dev,
> -		.id = SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS_SUPPORT,
> +		.id = SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS,
> +		.u.brport_flags = flags,
>  	};
>  	int err;
>  
>  	if (mask & ~BR_PORT_FLAGS_HW_OFFLOAD)
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	err = switchdev_port_attr_get(p->dev, &attr);
> -	if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP)
> -		return 0;
> -	if (err)
> +	err = switchdev_port_attr_set(p->dev, &attr);
> +	if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP)
>  		return err;
>  
> -	/* Check if specific bridge flag attribute offload is supported */
> -	if (!(attr.u.brport_flags_support & mask)) {
> +	if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP) {
>  		br_warn(p->br, "bridge flag offload is not supported %u(%s)\n",
>  			(unsigned int)p->port_no, p->dev->name);
> -		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +		return err;
>  	}

I see that you return -EOPNOTSUPP from drivers in case of unsupported
flags. I believe this is problematic (I'll test soon). The same return
code is used by:

1. Switch drivers to indicate unsupported flags
2. switchdev code to indicate unsupported netdev (no switchdev ops)

I guess that with this patch any attempt to set bridge port flags on
veth/dummy device will result in an error.

>  
>  	attr.id = SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS;
>  	attr.flags = SWITCHDEV_F_DEFER;
> -	attr.u.brport_flags = flags;
> +
>  	err = switchdev_port_attr_set(p->dev, &attr);
>  	if (err) {
>  		br_warn(p->br, "error setting offload flag on port %u(%s)\n",
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
	"moderated list:ETHERNET BRIDGE"
	<bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>, "andrew@lunn.ch" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	"vivien.didelot@gmail.com" <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 7/9] net: bridge: Stop calling switchdev_port_attr_get()
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 11:20:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190214112002.GA8698@splinter> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190213220638.1552-8-f.fainelli@gmail.com>

On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 02:06:36PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Now that all switchdev drivers have been converted to checking the
> bridge port flags during the prepare phase of the
> switchdev_port_attr_set() when the process
> SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS, we can avoid calling
> switchdev_port_attr_get() with
> SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS_SUPPORT.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> ---
>  net/bridge/br_switchdev.c | 16 +++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c b/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
> index db9e8ab96d48..8f88f8a1a7fa 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
> @@ -64,29 +64,27 @@ int br_switchdev_set_port_flag(struct net_bridge_port *p,
>  {
>  	struct switchdev_attr attr = {
>  		.orig_dev = p->dev,
> -		.id = SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS_SUPPORT,
> +		.id = SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS,
> +		.u.brport_flags = flags,
>  	};
>  	int err;
>  
>  	if (mask & ~BR_PORT_FLAGS_HW_OFFLOAD)
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	err = switchdev_port_attr_get(p->dev, &attr);
> -	if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP)
> -		return 0;
> -	if (err)
> +	err = switchdev_port_attr_set(p->dev, &attr);
> +	if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP)
>  		return err;
>  
> -	/* Check if specific bridge flag attribute offload is supported */
> -	if (!(attr.u.brport_flags_support & mask)) {
> +	if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP) {
>  		br_warn(p->br, "bridge flag offload is not supported %u(%s)\n",
>  			(unsigned int)p->port_no, p->dev->name);
> -		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +		return err;
>  	}

I see that you return -EOPNOTSUPP from drivers in case of unsupported
flags. I believe this is problematic (I'll test soon). The same return
code is used by:

1. Switch drivers to indicate unsupported flags
2. switchdev code to indicate unsupported netdev (no switchdev ops)

I guess that with this patch any attempt to set bridge port flags on
veth/dummy device will result in an error.

>  
>  	attr.id = SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS;
>  	attr.flags = SWITCHDEV_F_DEFER;
> -	attr.u.brport_flags = flags;
> +
>  	err = switchdev_port_attr_set(p->dev, &attr);
>  	if (err) {
>  		br_warn(p->br, "error setting offload flag on port %u(%s)\n",
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-14 11:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-13 22:06 [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 0/9] net: Get rid of switchdev_port_attr_get() Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 1/9] Documentation: networking: switchdev: Update port parent ID section Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06   ` Florian Fainelli
2019-02-14 10:58   ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2019-02-14 10:58     ` Ido Schimmel
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 2/9] net: switchdev: Add PORT_PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06   ` Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 3/9] mlxsw: spectrum: Check bridge flags during prepare phase Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06   ` Florian Fainelli
2019-02-14 13:11   ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2019-02-14 13:11     ` Ido Schimmel
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 4/9] staging: fsl-dpaa2: ethsw: Check bridge port flags during prepare Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06   ` Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 5/9] net: dsa: Add setter for SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06   ` Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 6/9] rocker: Check bridge flags during prepare phase Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06   ` Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 7/9] net: bridge: Stop calling switchdev_port_attr_get() Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06   ` Florian Fainelli
2019-02-14 11:20   ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2019-02-14 11:20     ` Ido Schimmel
2019-02-14 13:02     ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2019-02-14 13:02       ` Ido Schimmel
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 8/9] net: Remove SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS_SUPPORT Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06   ` Florian Fainelli
2019-02-14 11:27   ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2019-02-14 11:27     ` Ido Schimmel
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 9/9] net: Get rid of switchdev_port_attr_get() Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06   ` Florian Fainelli
2019-02-14 12:10   ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2019-02-14 12:10     ` Ido Schimmel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190214112002.GA8698@splinter \
    --to=idosch@mellanox.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.