From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: "open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
"andrew@lunn.ch" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ETHERNET BRIDGE"
<bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"vivien.didelot@gmail.com" <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 3/9] mlxsw: spectrum: Check bridge flags during prepare phase
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 13:11:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190214131143.GA12064@splinter> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190213220638.1552-4-f.fainelli@gmail.com>
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 02:06:32PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> In preparation for getting rid of switchdev_port_attr_get(), have mlxsw
> check for the bridge flags being set through switchdev_port_attr_set()
> when the SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS attribute identifier is
> used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> ---
> .../ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_switchdev.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_switchdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_switchdev.c
> index 1f492b7dbea8..7616eab50035 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_switchdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_switchdev.c
> @@ -598,13 +598,17 @@ mlxsw_sp_bridge_port_learning_set(struct mlxsw_sp_port *mlxsw_sp_port,
> static int mlxsw_sp_port_attr_br_flags_set(struct mlxsw_sp_port *mlxsw_sp_port,
> struct switchdev_trans *trans,
> struct net_device *orig_dev,
> - unsigned long brport_flags)
> + unsigned long brport_flags,
> + bool pre_set)
> {
> struct mlxsw_sp_bridge_port *bridge_port;
> int err;
>
> - if (switchdev_trans_ph_prepare(trans))
> + if (switchdev_trans_ph_prepare(trans) && pre_set) {
> + if (brport_flags & ~(BR_LEARNING | BR_FLOOD | BR_MCAST_FLOOD))
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> return 0;
> + }
When we get SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS we only want to
perform a check. With this code in case it's not prepare phase, then we
continue to set the flags. Better do:
if (pre_set) {
if (switchdev_trans_ph_commit(trans))
return 0;
// perform check here
}
>
> bridge_port = mlxsw_sp_bridge_port_find(mlxsw_sp_port->mlxsw_sp->bridge,
> orig_dev);
> @@ -833,6 +837,7 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_port_attr_set(struct net_device *dev,
> struct switchdev_trans *trans)
> {
> struct mlxsw_sp_port *mlxsw_sp_port = netdev_priv(dev);
> + bool pre_set = false;
> int err;
>
> switch (attr->id) {
> @@ -841,10 +846,13 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_port_attr_set(struct net_device *dev,
> attr->orig_dev,
> attr->u.stp_state);
> break;
> + case SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS:
> + pre_set = true; /* fall through */
> case SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS:
> err = mlxsw_sp_port_attr_br_flags_set(mlxsw_sp_port, trans,
> attr->orig_dev,
> - attr->u.brport_flags);
> + attr->u.brport_flags,
> + pre_set);
> break;
> case SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_AGEING_TIME:
> err = mlxsw_sp_port_attr_br_ageing_set(mlxsw_sp_port, trans,
> --
> 2.17.1
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
"moderated list:ETHERNET BRIDGE"
<bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>, "andrew@lunn.ch" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"vivien.didelot@gmail.com" <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/9] mlxsw: spectrum: Check bridge flags during prepare phase
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 13:11:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190214131143.GA12064@splinter> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190213220638.1552-4-f.fainelli@gmail.com>
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 02:06:32PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> In preparation for getting rid of switchdev_port_attr_get(), have mlxsw
> check for the bridge flags being set through switchdev_port_attr_set()
> when the SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS attribute identifier is
> used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> ---
> .../ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_switchdev.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_switchdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_switchdev.c
> index 1f492b7dbea8..7616eab50035 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_switchdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_switchdev.c
> @@ -598,13 +598,17 @@ mlxsw_sp_bridge_port_learning_set(struct mlxsw_sp_port *mlxsw_sp_port,
> static int mlxsw_sp_port_attr_br_flags_set(struct mlxsw_sp_port *mlxsw_sp_port,
> struct switchdev_trans *trans,
> struct net_device *orig_dev,
> - unsigned long brport_flags)
> + unsigned long brport_flags,
> + bool pre_set)
> {
> struct mlxsw_sp_bridge_port *bridge_port;
> int err;
>
> - if (switchdev_trans_ph_prepare(trans))
> + if (switchdev_trans_ph_prepare(trans) && pre_set) {
> + if (brport_flags & ~(BR_LEARNING | BR_FLOOD | BR_MCAST_FLOOD))
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> return 0;
> + }
When we get SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS we only want to
perform a check. With this code in case it's not prepare phase, then we
continue to set the flags. Better do:
if (pre_set) {
if (switchdev_trans_ph_commit(trans))
return 0;
// perform check here
}
>
> bridge_port = mlxsw_sp_bridge_port_find(mlxsw_sp_port->mlxsw_sp->bridge,
> orig_dev);
> @@ -833,6 +837,7 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_port_attr_set(struct net_device *dev,
> struct switchdev_trans *trans)
> {
> struct mlxsw_sp_port *mlxsw_sp_port = netdev_priv(dev);
> + bool pre_set = false;
> int err;
>
> switch (attr->id) {
> @@ -841,10 +846,13 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_port_attr_set(struct net_device *dev,
> attr->orig_dev,
> attr->u.stp_state);
> break;
> + case SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS:
> + pre_set = true; /* fall through */
> case SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS:
> err = mlxsw_sp_port_attr_br_flags_set(mlxsw_sp_port, trans,
> attr->orig_dev,
> - attr->u.brport_flags);
> + attr->u.brport_flags,
> + pre_set);
> break;
> case SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_AGEING_TIME:
> err = mlxsw_sp_port_attr_br_ageing_set(mlxsw_sp_port, trans,
> --
> 2.17.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-14 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-13 22:06 [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 0/9] net: Get rid of switchdev_port_attr_get() Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 1/9] Documentation: networking: switchdev: Update port parent ID section Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-02-14 10:58 ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2019-02-14 10:58 ` Ido Schimmel
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 2/9] net: switchdev: Add PORT_PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 3/9] mlxsw: spectrum: Check bridge flags during prepare phase Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-02-14 13:11 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2019-02-14 13:11 ` Ido Schimmel
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 4/9] staging: fsl-dpaa2: ethsw: Check bridge port flags during prepare Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 5/9] net: dsa: Add setter for SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 6/9] rocker: Check bridge flags during prepare phase Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 7/9] net: bridge: Stop calling switchdev_port_attr_get() Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-02-14 11:20 ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2019-02-14 11:20 ` Ido Schimmel
2019-02-14 13:02 ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2019-02-14 13:02 ` Ido Schimmel
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 8/9] net: Remove SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS_SUPPORT Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-02-14 11:27 ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2019-02-14 11:27 ` Ido Schimmel
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 9/9] net: Get rid of switchdev_port_attr_get() Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-02-14 12:10 ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2019-02-14 12:10 ` Ido Schimmel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190214131143.GA12064@splinter \
--to=idosch@mellanox.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.