From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal-LDxbnhwyfcJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Xiaolei Li <xiaolei.li-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: richard-/L3Ra7n9ekc@public.gmane.org,
linux-mediatek-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
linux-mtd-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
srv_heupstream-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] mtd: rawnand: mtk: Add validity check for CE# pin setting
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 11:11:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190429111106.6a02110b@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190429063834.45967-4-xiaolei.li-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Hi Xiaolei,
Xiaolei Li <xiaolei.li@mediatek.com> wrote on Mon, 29 Apr 2019 14:38:32
+0800:
> Currently, we only check how many CE# pins are set in device tree.
> But it should be necessary to check whether CE# pin setting is
> duplicated or if CE# pin index exceeds the maximum CE# number that
> controller supports.
>
> So, add validity check to avoid these invalid settings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaolei Li <xiaolei.li@mediatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c
> index a2f7af536380..7a5e8c9cf61b 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c
> @@ -162,6 +162,8 @@ struct mtk_nfc {
> struct list_head chips;
>
> u8 *buffer;
> +
> + unsigned long assigned_cs;
> };
>
> /*
> @@ -1351,6 +1353,17 @@ static int mtk_nfc_nand_chip_init(struct device *dev, struct mtk_nfc *nfc,
> dev_err(dev, "reg property failure : %d\n", ret);
> return ret;
> }
> +
> + if (tmp >= MTK_NAND_MAX_NSELS) {
> + dev_err(dev, "invalid CS: %u\n", tmp);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (test_and_set_bit(tmp, &nfc->assigned_cs)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "CS %u already assigned\n", tmp);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> chip->sels[i] = tmp;
> }
>
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Thanks,
Miquèl
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Xiaolei Li <xiaolei.li@mediatek.com>
Cc: richard@nod.at, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] mtd: rawnand: mtk: Add validity check for CE# pin setting
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 11:11:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190429111106.6a02110b@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190429063834.45967-4-xiaolei.li@mediatek.com>
Hi Xiaolei,
Xiaolei Li <xiaolei.li@mediatek.com> wrote on Mon, 29 Apr 2019 14:38:32
+0800:
> Currently, we only check how many CE# pins are set in device tree.
> But it should be necessary to check whether CE# pin setting is
> duplicated or if CE# pin index exceeds the maximum CE# number that
> controller supports.
>
> So, add validity check to avoid these invalid settings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaolei Li <xiaolei.li@mediatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c
> index a2f7af536380..7a5e8c9cf61b 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c
> @@ -162,6 +162,8 @@ struct mtk_nfc {
> struct list_head chips;
>
> u8 *buffer;
> +
> + unsigned long assigned_cs;
> };
>
> /*
> @@ -1351,6 +1353,17 @@ static int mtk_nfc_nand_chip_init(struct device *dev, struct mtk_nfc *nfc,
> dev_err(dev, "reg property failure : %d\n", ret);
> return ret;
> }
> +
> + if (tmp >= MTK_NAND_MAX_NSELS) {
> + dev_err(dev, "invalid CS: %u\n", tmp);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (test_and_set_bit(tmp, &nfc->assigned_cs)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "CS %u already assigned\n", tmp);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> chip->sels[i] = tmp;
> }
>
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Thanks,
Miquèl
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-29 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-29 6:38 [PATCH 0/5] MTK NAND driver improvements and fixes Xiaolei Li
2019-04-29 6:38 ` Xiaolei Li
2019-04-29 6:38 ` [PATCH 1/5] mtd: rawnand: mtk: Correct low level time calculation of r/w cycle Xiaolei Li
2019-04-29 6:38 ` Xiaolei Li
[not found] ` <20190429063834.45967-2-xiaolei.li-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2019-04-29 9:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-04-29 9:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-04-29 9:35 ` xiaolei li
2019-04-29 9:35 ` xiaolei li
2019-04-29 10:02 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-04-29 10:02 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-04-30 0:59 ` xiaolei li
2019-04-30 0:59 ` xiaolei li
2019-04-29 6:38 ` [PATCH 2/5] mtd: rawnand: mtk: Improve data sampling timing for read cycle Xiaolei Li
2019-04-29 6:38 ` Xiaolei Li
[not found] ` <20190429063834.45967-3-xiaolei.li-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2019-04-29 9:10 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-04-29 9:10 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-04-29 9:49 ` xiaolei li
2019-04-29 6:38 ` [PATCH 3/5] mtd: rawnand: mtk: Add validity check for CE# pin setting Xiaolei Li
2019-04-29 6:38 ` Xiaolei Li
[not found] ` <20190429063834.45967-4-xiaolei.li-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2019-04-29 9:11 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2019-04-29 9:11 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-04-29 6:38 ` [PATCH 4/5] mtd: rawnand: mtk: Fix wrongly assigned oob buffer pointer issue Xiaolei Li
2019-04-29 6:38 ` Xiaolei Li
[not found] ` <20190429063834.45967-5-xiaolei.li-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2019-04-29 9:14 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-04-29 9:14 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-04-29 9:52 ` xiaolei li
2019-04-29 9:52 ` xiaolei li
2019-04-29 6:38 ` [PATCH 5/5] mtd: rawnand: mtk: Setup empty page threshold correctly Xiaolei Li
2019-04-29 6:38 ` Xiaolei Li
[not found] ` <20190429063834.45967-6-xiaolei.li-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2019-04-29 9:22 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-04-29 9:22 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-04-29 9:57 ` xiaolei li
2019-04-29 9:57 ` xiaolei li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190429111106.6a02110b@xps13 \
--to=miquel.raynal-ldxbnhwyfcjbdgjk7y7tuq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-mtd-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=richard-/L3Ra7n9ekc@public.gmane.org \
--cc=srv_heupstream-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=xiaolei.li-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.