From: <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>
To: <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
Cc: michal.lkml@markovi.net, nicolas.palix@imag.fr,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
Subject: Re: [Cocci] Coccinelle: semantic patch for missing of_node_put
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 13:50:00 +0800 (CST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201906041350002807147@zte.com.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa3b24ba-1c57-3115-6a01-ee98fd702087@web.de>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2253 bytes --]
> > 2, A general method.
> > We also try to get the list of functions to consider by writing a SmPL,
> > but this method is not feasible at present, because it is not easy to parse the comment
> > header information of these functions.
>
> The situation was improved once more also for the Coccinelle software.
> How do you think about to develop any more variants based on information
> from a script (like the following) for the semantic patch language?
>
> @initialize:python@
> @@
> import re, sys
> filter = re.compile(" when done")
>
> @find@
> comments c;
> identifier x;
> type t;
> @@
> t@c x(...)
> { ... }
>
> @script:python selection@
> input << find.c;
> @@
> if filter.search(input[0].before, 2):
> sys.stderr.write(input[0].before + "\n=====\n")
> else:
> cocci.include_match(False)
>
> @display@
> identifier find.x;
> type find.t;
> @@
> *t x(...)
> { ... }
>
>
> Does such a source code analysis approach indicate any details
> which should be improved for the affected software documentation?
Thank you for your example.
We currently use the following Ocaml script to automatically
collect functions that need to be considered.
@initialize:ocaml@
@@
let relevant_str = "use of_node_put() on it when done"
let contains s1 s2 =
let re = Str.regexp_string s2
in
try ignore (Str.search_forward re s1 0); true
with Not_found -> false
let relevant_functions = ref []
let add_function f c =
if not (List.mem f !relevant_functions)
then
begin
let s = String.concat " "
(
(List.map String.lowercase_ascii
(List.filter
(function x ->
Str.string_match
(Str.regexp "[a-zA-Z_\\(\\)][-a-zA-Z0-9_\\(\\)]*$")
x 0) (Str.split (Str.regexp "[ .;\t\n]+") c)))) in
Printf.printf "comments: %s\n" s;
if contains s relevant_str
then
Printf.printf "Found relevant function: %s\n" f;
relevant_functions := f :: !relevant_functions;
end
@r@
identifier fn;
comments c;
type T = struct device_node *;
@@
T@c fn(...) {
...
}
@script:ocaml@
f << r.fn;
c << r.c;
@@
let (cb,cm,ca) = List.hd c in
let c = String.concat " " cb in
add_function f c
--
Regards,
Wen
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 136 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-04 5:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <201905171432571474636@zte.com.cn>
2019-05-17 7:14 ` Coccinelle: semantic patch for missing of_node_put Julia Lawall
2019-05-17 8:22 ` [Cocci] " Markus Elfring
2019-05-17 8:22 ` Markus Elfring
2019-05-20 9:33 ` Pavel Machek
2019-05-20 9:51 ` Julia Lawall
2019-05-20 9:52 ` [Cocci] " Julia Lawall
2019-05-20 9:52 ` Julia Lawall
2019-05-20 17:20 ` [Cocci] " Sasha Levin
2019-05-20 17:20 ` Sasha Levin
2019-05-20 19:53 ` [Cocci] " Julia Lawall
2019-05-20 19:53 ` Julia Lawall
2019-05-20 20:11 ` [Cocci] " Markus Elfring
2019-05-20 20:11 ` Markus Elfring
2019-05-17 8:10 ` [Cocci] " Markus Elfring
2019-05-17 8:10 ` Markus Elfring
2019-05-18 14:43 ` [Cocci] " Markus Elfring
2019-05-18 14:43 ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-04 5:08 ` [Cocci] " Markus Elfring
2019-06-04 5:08 ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-04 5:50 ` wen.yang99 [this message]
2019-06-04 6:36 ` [Cocci] " Markus Elfring
2019-06-04 6:36 ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-04 8:55 ` [Cocci] " wen.yang99
2019-06-04 9:08 ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-04 9:08 ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-04 11:28 ` [Cocci] " Markus Elfring
2019-06-04 11:28 ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-05 18:23 ` [Cocci] Coccinelle: Searching for “when done” in function comments Markus Elfring
2019-06-05 18:23 ` Markus Elfring
2019-05-09 1:47 [Cocci] [PATCH] coccinelle: semantic patch for missing of_node_put wen.yang99
2019-05-09 8:10 ` [Cocci] Coccinelle: " Markus Elfring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201906041350002807147@zte.com.cn \
--to=wen.yang99@zte.com.cn \
--cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \
--cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
--cc=nicolas.palix@imag.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.