All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
	Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
	Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Coccinelle <cocci@systeme.lip6.fr>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [Cocci] Coccinelle: semantic patch for missing of_node_put
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 22:11:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <60d87dff-3b4e-d77b-a4e5-e00b010d414b@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1905202151140.2561@hadrien>

> On the other hand, I don't know if the one that seemed to cause a crash
> really caused a crash.  It was detected by syzkaller, and it is also
> possible that git bisect ended up at the wrong place.

Do you refer to any known bug report here?


> In any case, forgetting an of_node_put will normally just waste a little
> memory, so probably stable kernels don't care.

Will it be nice to achieve better exception handling also for these
software versions over time?

Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr>,
	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
	Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
	Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>,
	Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>,
	Coccinelle <cocci@systeme.lip6.fr>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Coccinelle: semantic patch for missing of_node_put
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 22:11:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <60d87dff-3b4e-d77b-a4e5-e00b010d414b@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1905202151140.2561@hadrien>

> On the other hand, I don't know if the one that seemed to cause a crash
> really caused a crash.  It was detected by syzkaller, and it is also
> possible that git bisect ended up at the wrong place.

Do you refer to any known bug report here?


> In any case, forgetting an of_node_put will normally just waste a little
> memory, so probably stable kernels don't care.

Will it be nice to achieve better exception handling also for these
software versions over time?

Regards,
Markus

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-20 20:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <201905171432571474636@zte.com.cn>
2019-05-17  7:14 ` Coccinelle: semantic patch for missing of_node_put Julia Lawall
2019-05-17  8:22   ` [Cocci] " Markus Elfring
2019-05-17  8:22     ` Markus Elfring
2019-05-20  9:33   ` Pavel Machek
2019-05-20  9:51     ` Julia Lawall
2019-05-20  9:52     ` [Cocci] " Julia Lawall
2019-05-20  9:52       ` Julia Lawall
2019-05-20 17:20       ` [Cocci] " Sasha Levin
2019-05-20 17:20         ` Sasha Levin
2019-05-20 19:53         ` [Cocci] " Julia Lawall
2019-05-20 19:53           ` Julia Lawall
2019-05-20 20:11           ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2019-05-20 20:11             ` Markus Elfring
2019-05-17  8:10 ` [Cocci] " Markus Elfring
2019-05-17  8:10   ` Markus Elfring
2019-05-18 14:43 ` [Cocci] " Markus Elfring
2019-05-18 14:43   ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-04  5:08 ` [Cocci] " Markus Elfring
2019-06-04  5:08   ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-04  5:50   ` [Cocci] " wen.yang99
2019-06-04  6:36     ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-04  6:36       ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-04  8:55       ` [Cocci] " wen.yang99
2019-06-04  9:08         ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-04  9:08           ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-04 11:28     ` [Cocci] " Markus Elfring
2019-06-04 11:28       ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-05 18:23   ` [Cocci] Coccinelle: Searching for “when done” in function comments Markus Elfring
2019-06-05 18:23     ` Markus Elfring
2019-05-09  1:47 [Cocci] [PATCH] coccinelle: semantic patch for missing of_node_put wen.yang99
2019-05-09  8:10 ` [Cocci] Coccinelle: " Markus Elfring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=60d87dff-3b4e-d77b-a4e5-e00b010d414b@web.de \
    --to=markus.elfring@web.de \
    --cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
    --cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
    --cc=nicolas.palix@imag.fr \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=wen.yang99@zte.com.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.