All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
	Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
Subject: Re: [Cocci] Coccinelle: semantic patch for missing of_node_put
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 08:36:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1bc40e20-d4d0-77e6-67d6-2230e8026ef0@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201906041350002807147@zte.com.cn>

> We currently use the following Ocaml script to automatically
> collect functions that need to be considered.
>
> @initialize:ocaml@
> @@
>
> let relevant_str = "use of_node_put() on it when done"

I suggest to reconsider this search pattern.

The mentioned words are distributed over text lines in the discussed
software documentation.
Thus I imagine that an other documentation format would be safer
and more helpful for the determination of a corresponding API
system property.

Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr>,
	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
	Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
	Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>
Subject: Re: Coccinelle: semantic patch for missing of_node_put
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 08:36:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1bc40e20-d4d0-77e6-67d6-2230e8026ef0@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201906041350002807147@zte.com.cn>

> We currently use the following Ocaml script to automatically
> collect functions that need to be considered.
>
> @initialize:ocaml@
> @@
>
> let relevant_str = "use of_node_put() on it when done"

I suggest to reconsider this search pattern.

The mentioned words are distributed over text lines in the discussed
software documentation.
Thus I imagine that an other documentation format would be safer
and more helpful for the determination of a corresponding API
system property.

Regards,
Markus

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-04  6:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <201905171432571474636@zte.com.cn>
2019-05-17  7:14 ` Coccinelle: semantic patch for missing of_node_put Julia Lawall
2019-05-17  8:22   ` [Cocci] " Markus Elfring
2019-05-17  8:22     ` Markus Elfring
2019-05-20  9:33   ` Pavel Machek
2019-05-20  9:51     ` Julia Lawall
2019-05-20  9:52     ` [Cocci] " Julia Lawall
2019-05-20  9:52       ` Julia Lawall
2019-05-20 17:20       ` [Cocci] " Sasha Levin
2019-05-20 17:20         ` Sasha Levin
2019-05-20 19:53         ` [Cocci] " Julia Lawall
2019-05-20 19:53           ` Julia Lawall
2019-05-20 20:11           ` [Cocci] " Markus Elfring
2019-05-20 20:11             ` Markus Elfring
2019-05-17  8:10 ` [Cocci] " Markus Elfring
2019-05-17  8:10   ` Markus Elfring
2019-05-18 14:43 ` [Cocci] " Markus Elfring
2019-05-18 14:43   ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-04  5:08 ` [Cocci] " Markus Elfring
2019-06-04  5:08   ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-04  5:50   ` [Cocci] " wen.yang99
2019-06-04  6:36     ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2019-06-04  6:36       ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-04  8:55       ` [Cocci] " wen.yang99
2019-06-04  9:08         ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-04  9:08           ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-04 11:28     ` [Cocci] " Markus Elfring
2019-06-04 11:28       ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-05 18:23   ` [Cocci] Coccinelle: Searching for “when done” in function comments Markus Elfring
2019-06-05 18:23     ` Markus Elfring
2019-05-09  1:47 [Cocci] [PATCH] coccinelle: semantic patch for missing of_node_put wen.yang99
2019-05-09  8:10 ` [Cocci] Coccinelle: " Markus Elfring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1bc40e20-d4d0-77e6-67d6-2230e8026ef0@web.de \
    --to=markus.elfring@web.de \
    --cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
    --cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
    --cc=nicolas.palix@imag.fr \
    --cc=wen.yang99@zte.com.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.