All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
	Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
Subject: Re: [Cocci] Coccinelle: Searching for “when done” in function comments
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 20:23:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1d3370e3-187e-cd4b-93fe-7c011b1eeb96@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa3b24ba-1c57-3115-6a01-ee98fd702087@web.de>

> Does such a source code analysis approach indicate any details
> which should be improved for the affected software documentation?

I have constructed another SmPL script variant.

It can point out that the text “ when done” occurs in comment lines before
48 function implementations which are provided by 20 source files of
the software “Linux next-20190605”.
Will this source code analysis result trigger further development efforts
around detection of unique wordings in these descriptions?

Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr>,
	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
	Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
	Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>
Subject: Re: Coccinelle: Searching for “when done” in function comments
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 20:23:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1d3370e3-187e-cd4b-93fe-7c011b1eeb96@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa3b24ba-1c57-3115-6a01-ee98fd702087@web.de>

> Does such a source code analysis approach indicate any details
> which should be improved for the affected software documentation?

I have constructed another SmPL script variant.

It can point out that the text “ when done” occurs in comment lines before
48 function implementations which are provided by 20 source files of
the software “Linux next-20190605”.
Will this source code analysis result trigger further development efforts
around detection of unique wordings in these descriptions?

Regards,
Markus

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-05 18:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <201905171432571474636@zte.com.cn>
2019-05-17  7:14 ` Coccinelle: semantic patch for missing of_node_put Julia Lawall
2019-05-17  8:22   ` [Cocci] " Markus Elfring
2019-05-17  8:22     ` Markus Elfring
2019-05-20  9:33   ` Pavel Machek
2019-05-20  9:51     ` Julia Lawall
2019-05-20  9:52     ` [Cocci] " Julia Lawall
2019-05-20  9:52       ` Julia Lawall
2019-05-20 17:20       ` [Cocci] " Sasha Levin
2019-05-20 17:20         ` Sasha Levin
2019-05-20 19:53         ` [Cocci] " Julia Lawall
2019-05-20 19:53           ` Julia Lawall
2019-05-20 20:11           ` [Cocci] " Markus Elfring
2019-05-20 20:11             ` Markus Elfring
2019-05-17  8:10 ` [Cocci] " Markus Elfring
2019-05-17  8:10   ` Markus Elfring
2019-05-18 14:43 ` [Cocci] " Markus Elfring
2019-05-18 14:43   ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-04  5:08 ` [Cocci] " Markus Elfring
2019-06-04  5:08   ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-04  5:50   ` [Cocci] " wen.yang99
2019-06-04  6:36     ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-04  6:36       ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-04  8:55       ` [Cocci] " wen.yang99
2019-06-04  9:08         ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-04  9:08           ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-04 11:28     ` [Cocci] " Markus Elfring
2019-06-04 11:28       ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-05 18:23   ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2019-06-05 18:23     ` Coccinelle: Searching for “when done” in function comments Markus Elfring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1d3370e3-187e-cd4b-93fe-7c011b1eeb96@web.de \
    --to=markus.elfring@web.de \
    --cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
    --cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
    --cc=nicolas.palix@imag.fr \
    --cc=wen.yang99@zte.com.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.