From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] selftests/fpu: Add an FPU selftest
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:04:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200622170446.GG32200@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202006210328.6YokxLP3%lkp@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7766 bytes --]
On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 03:55:00AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Borislav,
>
> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on kselftest/next]
> [also build test ERROR on tip/auto-latest linus/master v5.8-rc1 next-20200618]
> [cannot apply to tip/x86/core]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
>
> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Borislav-Petkov/x86-FPU-FPU-sanitization-for-in-kernel-use/20200620-014453
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git next
> config: x86_64-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
> compiler: clang version 11.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 487ca07fcc75d52755c9fe2ee05bcb3b6eeeec44)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> # install x86_64 cross compiling tool for clang build
> # apt-get install binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu
> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=x86_64
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<):
>
> >> ERROR: modpost: "__gtdf2" [lib/test_fpu.ko] undefined!
> >> ERROR: modpost: "__divdf3" [lib/test_fpu.ko] undefined!
> >> ERROR: modpost: "__muldf3" [lib/test_fpu.ko] undefined!
> >> ERROR: modpost: "__adddf3" [lib/test_fpu.ko] undefined!
Hmm, the point here is to actually have SSE* code in a kernel module for
testing. And gcc does the right thing, see below.
LLVM folks, how can I make llvm not call those library functions and
actually spit out SSE* code?
Full build command is:
/mnt/smr/share/src/llvm/tc-build/install/bin/clang-11 -Wp,-MMD,lib/.test_fpu.o.d -nostdinc -isystem /mnt/smr/share/src/llvm/tc-build/install/lib/clang/11.0.0/include -I./arch/x86/include -I./arch/x86/include/generated -I./include -I./arch/x86/include/uapi -I./arch/x86/include/generated/uapi -I./include/uapi -I./include/generated/uapi -include ./include/linux/kconfig.h -include ./include/linux/compiler_types.h -D__KERNEL__ -Qunused-arguments -Wall -Wundef -Werror=strict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -fshort-wchar -fno-PIE -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -Werror=implicit-int -Wno-format-security -std=gnu89 -no-integrated-as -Werror=unknown-warning-option -mno-sse -mno-mmx -mno-sse2 -mno-3dnow -mno-avx -m64 -mno-80387 -mstack-alignment=8 -march=k8 -mno-red-zone -mcmodel=kernel -Wno-sign-compare -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -mretpoline-external-thunk -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -Wno-frame-address -Wno-address-of-packed-member -O2 -Wframe-larger-than=2048 -fstack-protector -Wno-format-invalid-specifier -Wno-gnu -mno-global-merge -Wno-unused-const-variable -g -DCC_USING_FENTRY -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wvla -Wno-pointer-sign -Wno-array-bounds -fno-strict-overflow -fno-merge-all-constants -fno-stack-check -Werror=date-time -Werror=incompatible-pointer-types -fmacro-prefix-map=./= -fcf-protection=none -Wno-initializer-overrides -Wno-format -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-format-zero-length -Wno-pointer-to-enum-cast -Wno-tautological-constant-out-of-range-compare -mhard-float -msse -DMODULE -DKBUILD_BASENAME='"test_fpu"' -DKBUILD_MODNAME='"test_fpu"' -c -o lib/test_fpu.o lib/test_fpu.c
Thx.
--- /tmp/test_fpu.s.gcc 2020-06-22 18:51:25.828615337 +0200
+++ /tmp/test_fpu.s.llvm-11 2020-06-22 18:50:35.080614534 +0200
@@ -1,74 +1,49 @@
-test_fpu_get:
- pushq %r12 #
- pushq %rbx #
- movq %rsi, %rbx # tmp119, val
- subq $56, %rsp #,
-# lib/test_fpu.c:58: kernel_fpu_begin();
- call kernel_fpu_begin #
-# lib/test_fpu.c:32: a = 4.0;
- movlpd .LC1(%rip), %xmm0 #, tmp106
- movsd %xmm0, (%rsp) # tmp106, a
-# lib/test_fpu.c:33: b = 1e-15;
- movlpd .LC2(%rip), %xmm0 #, tmp107
- movsd %xmm0, 8(%rsp) # tmp107, b
-# lib/test_fpu.c:34: c = 1e-310;
- movlpd .LC3(%rip), %xmm0 #, tmp108
- movsd %xmm0, 16(%rsp) # tmp108, c
-# lib/test_fpu.c:37: d = a + b;
- movlpd (%rsp), %xmm0 # a, a.2_8
- movlpd 8(%rsp), %xmm1 # b, b.3_9
- addsd %xmm1, %xmm0 # b.3_9, _10
-# lib/test_fpu.c:37: d = a + b;
- movsd %xmm0, 24(%rsp) # _10, d
-# lib/test_fpu.c:40: e = a + b / 2;
- movlpd 8(%rsp), %xmm0 # b, b.4_11
-# lib/test_fpu.c:40: e = a + b / 2;
- movlpd (%rsp), %xmm1 # a, a.5_13
-# lib/test_fpu.c:40: e = a + b / 2;
- mulsd .LC4(%rip), %xmm0 #, tmp109
-# lib/test_fpu.c:40: e = a + b / 2;
- addsd %xmm1, %xmm0 # a.5_13, _14
-# lib/test_fpu.c:40: e = a + b / 2;
- movsd %xmm0, 32(%rsp) # _14, e
-# lib/test_fpu.c:43: f = b / c;
- movlpd 8(%rsp), %xmm0 # b, b.6_15
- movlpd 16(%rsp), %xmm1 # c, c.7_16
- divsd %xmm1, %xmm0 # c.7_16, _17
-# lib/test_fpu.c:43: f = b / c;
- movsd %xmm0, 40(%rsp) # _17, f
-# lib/test_fpu.c:46: g = a + c * f;
- movlpd 16(%rsp), %xmm0 # c, c.8_18
- movlpd 40(%rsp), %xmm2 # f, f.9_19
-# lib/test_fpu.c:46: g = a + c * f;
- movlpd (%rsp), %xmm1 # a, a.10_21
-# lib/test_fpu.c:46: g = a + c * f;
- mulsd %xmm2, %xmm0 # f.9_19, tmp111
-# lib/test_fpu.c:46: g = a + c * f;
- addsd %xmm1, %xmm0 # a.10_21, _22
-# lib/test_fpu.c:46: g = a + c * f;
- movsd %xmm0, 48(%rsp) # _22, g
-# lib/test_fpu.c:48: if (d > a && e > a && g > a)
- movlpd 24(%rsp), %xmm1 # d, d.11_23
- movlpd (%rsp), %xmm0 # a, a.12_24
-# lib/test_fpu.c:48: if (d > a && e > a && g > a)
- comisd %xmm0, %xmm1 # a.12_24, d.11_23
- jbe .L15 #,
-# lib/test_fpu.c:48: if (d > a && e > a && g > a)
- movlpd 32(%rsp), %xmm1 # e, e.13_25
- movlpd (%rsp), %xmm0 # a, a.14_26
-# lib/test_fpu.c:48: if (d > a && e > a && g > a)
- comisd %xmm0, %xmm1 # a.14_26, e.13_25
- jbe .L15 #,
-# lib/test_fpu.c:48: if (d > a && e > a && g > a)
- movlpd 48(%rsp), %xmm1 # g, g.15_27
-# lib/test_fpu.c:51: return -EINVAL;
- movl $0, %r12d #, tmp117
- movl $-22, %eax #, tmp118
-# lib/test_fpu.c:48: if (d > a && e > a && g > a)
- movlpd (%rsp), %xmm0 # a, a.16_28
-# lib/test_fpu.c:51: return -EINVAL;
- comisd %xmm0, %xmm1 # a.16_28, g.15_27
- cmovbe %eax, %r12d # tmp117,, tmp118, <retval>
-.L4:
-# lib/test_fpu.c:60: kernel_fpu_end();
- call kernel_fpu_end #
+test_fpu_get: # @test_fpu_get
+# %bb.0:
+ pushq %rbp
+ pushq %rbx
+ subq $56, %rsp
+ movq %rsi, %rbx
+ callq kernel_fpu_begin
+ movabsq $4616189618054758400, %rax # imm = 0x4010000000000000
+ movq %rax, (%rsp)
+ movabsq $4382569440205035030, %rax # imm = 0x3CD203AF9EE75616
+ movq %rax, 8(%rsp)
+ movabsq $20240225330731, %rax # imm = 0x12688B70E62B
+ movq %rax, 16(%rsp)
+ movq (%rsp), %rdi
+ movq 8(%rsp), %rsi
+ callq __adddf3
+ movq %rax, 48(%rsp)
+ movq (%rsp), %rbp
+ movq 8(%rsp), %rdi
+ movabsq $4602678819172646912, %rsi # imm = 0x3FE0000000000000
+ callq __muldf3
+ movq %rbp, %rdi
+ movq %rax, %rsi
+ callq __adddf3
+ movq %rax, 40(%rsp)
+ movq 8(%rsp), %rdi
+ movq 16(%rsp), %rsi
+ callq __divdf3
+ movq %rax, 32(%rsp)
+ movq (%rsp), %rbp
+ movq 16(%rsp), %rdi
+ movq 32(%rsp), %rsi
+ callq __muldf3
+ movq %rbp, %rdi
+ movq %rax, %rsi
+ callq __adddf3
+ movq %rax, 24(%rsp)
+ movq 48(%rsp), %rdi
+ movq (%rsp), %rsi
+ callq __gtdf2
+ testl %eax, %eax
+ jle .LBB3_3
+# %bb.1:
+ movq 40(%rsp), %rdi
+ movq (%rsp), %rsi
+ callq __gtdf2
+ testl %eax, %eax
+ jle .LBB3_3
+# %bb.2:
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
Cc: X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
kbuild-all@lists.01.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
jpa@kernelbug.mail.kapsi.fi, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] selftests/fpu: Add an FPU selftest
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:04:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200622170446.GG32200@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202006210328.6YokxLP3%lkp@intel.com>
On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 03:55:00AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Borislav,
>
> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on kselftest/next]
> [also build test ERROR on tip/auto-latest linus/master v5.8-rc1 next-20200618]
> [cannot apply to tip/x86/core]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
>
> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Borislav-Petkov/x86-FPU-FPU-sanitization-for-in-kernel-use/20200620-014453
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git next
> config: x86_64-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
> compiler: clang version 11.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 487ca07fcc75d52755c9fe2ee05bcb3b6eeeec44)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> # install x86_64 cross compiling tool for clang build
> # apt-get install binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu
> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=x86_64
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<):
>
> >> ERROR: modpost: "__gtdf2" [lib/test_fpu.ko] undefined!
> >> ERROR: modpost: "__divdf3" [lib/test_fpu.ko] undefined!
> >> ERROR: modpost: "__muldf3" [lib/test_fpu.ko] undefined!
> >> ERROR: modpost: "__adddf3" [lib/test_fpu.ko] undefined!
Hmm, the point here is to actually have SSE* code in a kernel module for
testing. And gcc does the right thing, see below.
LLVM folks, how can I make llvm not call those library functions and
actually spit out SSE* code?
Full build command is:
/mnt/smr/share/src/llvm/tc-build/install/bin/clang-11 -Wp,-MMD,lib/.test_fpu.o.d -nostdinc -isystem /mnt/smr/share/src/llvm/tc-build/install/lib/clang/11.0.0/include -I./arch/x86/include -I./arch/x86/include/generated -I./include -I./arch/x86/include/uapi -I./arch/x86/include/generated/uapi -I./include/uapi -I./include/generated/uapi -include ./include/linux/kconfig.h -include ./include/linux/compiler_types.h -D__KERNEL__ -Qunused-arguments -Wall -Wundef -Werror=strict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -fshort-wchar -fno-PIE -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -Werror=implicit-int -Wno-format-security -std=gnu89 -no-integrated-as -Werror=unknown-warning-option -mno-sse -mno-mmx -mno-sse2 -mno-3dnow -mno-avx -m64 -mno-80387 -mstack-alignment=8 -march=k8 -mno-red-zone -mcmodel=kernel -Wno-sign-compare -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -mretpoline-external-thunk -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -Wno-frame-address -Wno-address-of-packed-member -O2 -Wframe-larger-than=2048 -fstack-protector -Wno-format-invalid-specifier -Wno-gnu -mno-global-merge -Wno-unused-const-variable -g -DCC_USING_FENTRY -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wvla -Wno-pointer-sign -Wno-array-bounds -fno-strict-overflow -fno-merge-all-constants -fno-stack-check -Werror=date-time -Werror=incompatible-pointer-types -fmacro-prefix-map=./= -fcf-protection=none -Wno-initializer-overrides -Wno-format -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-format-zero-length -Wno-pointer-to-enum-cast -Wno-tautological-constant-out-of-range-compare -mhard-float -msse -DMODULE -DKBUILD_BASENAME='"test_fpu"' -DKBUILD_MODNAME='"test_fpu"' -c -o lib/test_fpu.o lib/test_fpu.c
Thx.
--- /tmp/test_fpu.s.gcc 2020-06-22 18:51:25.828615337 +0200
+++ /tmp/test_fpu.s.llvm-11 2020-06-22 18:50:35.080614534 +0200
@@ -1,74 +1,49 @@
-test_fpu_get:
- pushq %r12 #
- pushq %rbx #
- movq %rsi, %rbx # tmp119, val
- subq $56, %rsp #,
-# lib/test_fpu.c:58: kernel_fpu_begin();
- call kernel_fpu_begin #
-# lib/test_fpu.c:32: a = 4.0;
- movlpd .LC1(%rip), %xmm0 #, tmp106
- movsd %xmm0, (%rsp) # tmp106, a
-# lib/test_fpu.c:33: b = 1e-15;
- movlpd .LC2(%rip), %xmm0 #, tmp107
- movsd %xmm0, 8(%rsp) # tmp107, b
-# lib/test_fpu.c:34: c = 1e-310;
- movlpd .LC3(%rip), %xmm0 #, tmp108
- movsd %xmm0, 16(%rsp) # tmp108, c
-# lib/test_fpu.c:37: d = a + b;
- movlpd (%rsp), %xmm0 # a, a.2_8
- movlpd 8(%rsp), %xmm1 # b, b.3_9
- addsd %xmm1, %xmm0 # b.3_9, _10
-# lib/test_fpu.c:37: d = a + b;
- movsd %xmm0, 24(%rsp) # _10, d
-# lib/test_fpu.c:40: e = a + b / 2;
- movlpd 8(%rsp), %xmm0 # b, b.4_11
-# lib/test_fpu.c:40: e = a + b / 2;
- movlpd (%rsp), %xmm1 # a, a.5_13
-# lib/test_fpu.c:40: e = a + b / 2;
- mulsd .LC4(%rip), %xmm0 #, tmp109
-# lib/test_fpu.c:40: e = a + b / 2;
- addsd %xmm1, %xmm0 # a.5_13, _14
-# lib/test_fpu.c:40: e = a + b / 2;
- movsd %xmm0, 32(%rsp) # _14, e
-# lib/test_fpu.c:43: f = b / c;
- movlpd 8(%rsp), %xmm0 # b, b.6_15
- movlpd 16(%rsp), %xmm1 # c, c.7_16
- divsd %xmm1, %xmm0 # c.7_16, _17
-# lib/test_fpu.c:43: f = b / c;
- movsd %xmm0, 40(%rsp) # _17, f
-# lib/test_fpu.c:46: g = a + c * f;
- movlpd 16(%rsp), %xmm0 # c, c.8_18
- movlpd 40(%rsp), %xmm2 # f, f.9_19
-# lib/test_fpu.c:46: g = a + c * f;
- movlpd (%rsp), %xmm1 # a, a.10_21
-# lib/test_fpu.c:46: g = a + c * f;
- mulsd %xmm2, %xmm0 # f.9_19, tmp111
-# lib/test_fpu.c:46: g = a + c * f;
- addsd %xmm1, %xmm0 # a.10_21, _22
-# lib/test_fpu.c:46: g = a + c * f;
- movsd %xmm0, 48(%rsp) # _22, g
-# lib/test_fpu.c:48: if (d > a && e > a && g > a)
- movlpd 24(%rsp), %xmm1 # d, d.11_23
- movlpd (%rsp), %xmm0 # a, a.12_24
-# lib/test_fpu.c:48: if (d > a && e > a && g > a)
- comisd %xmm0, %xmm1 # a.12_24, d.11_23
- jbe .L15 #,
-# lib/test_fpu.c:48: if (d > a && e > a && g > a)
- movlpd 32(%rsp), %xmm1 # e, e.13_25
- movlpd (%rsp), %xmm0 # a, a.14_26
-# lib/test_fpu.c:48: if (d > a && e > a && g > a)
- comisd %xmm0, %xmm1 # a.14_26, e.13_25
- jbe .L15 #,
-# lib/test_fpu.c:48: if (d > a && e > a && g > a)
- movlpd 48(%rsp), %xmm1 # g, g.15_27
-# lib/test_fpu.c:51: return -EINVAL;
- movl $0, %r12d #, tmp117
- movl $-22, %eax #, tmp118
-# lib/test_fpu.c:48: if (d > a && e > a && g > a)
- movlpd (%rsp), %xmm0 # a, a.16_28
-# lib/test_fpu.c:51: return -EINVAL;
- comisd %xmm0, %xmm1 # a.16_28, g.15_27
- cmovbe %eax, %r12d # tmp117,, tmp118, <retval>
-.L4:
-# lib/test_fpu.c:60: kernel_fpu_end();
- call kernel_fpu_end #
+test_fpu_get: # @test_fpu_get
+# %bb.0:
+ pushq %rbp
+ pushq %rbx
+ subq $56, %rsp
+ movq %rsi, %rbx
+ callq kernel_fpu_begin
+ movabsq $4616189618054758400, %rax # imm = 0x4010000000000000
+ movq %rax, (%rsp)
+ movabsq $4382569440205035030, %rax # imm = 0x3CD203AF9EE75616
+ movq %rax, 8(%rsp)
+ movabsq $20240225330731, %rax # imm = 0x12688B70E62B
+ movq %rax, 16(%rsp)
+ movq (%rsp), %rdi
+ movq 8(%rsp), %rsi
+ callq __adddf3
+ movq %rax, 48(%rsp)
+ movq (%rsp), %rbp
+ movq 8(%rsp), %rdi
+ movabsq $4602678819172646912, %rsi # imm = 0x3FE0000000000000
+ callq __muldf3
+ movq %rbp, %rdi
+ movq %rax, %rsi
+ callq __adddf3
+ movq %rax, 40(%rsp)
+ movq 8(%rsp), %rdi
+ movq 16(%rsp), %rsi
+ callq __divdf3
+ movq %rax, 32(%rsp)
+ movq (%rsp), %rbp
+ movq 16(%rsp), %rdi
+ movq 32(%rsp), %rsi
+ callq __muldf3
+ movq %rbp, %rdi
+ movq %rax, %rsi
+ callq __adddf3
+ movq %rax, 24(%rsp)
+ movq 48(%rsp), %rdi
+ movq (%rsp), %rsi
+ callq __gtdf2
+ testl %eax, %eax
+ jle .LBB3_3
+# %bb.1:
+ movq 40(%rsp), %rdi
+ movq (%rsp), %rsi
+ callq __gtdf2
+ testl %eax, %eax
+ jle .LBB3_3
+# %bb.2:
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-22 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-19 17:41 [PATCH 0/2] x86/FPU: FPU sanitization for in-kernel use Borislav Petkov
2020-06-19 17:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/fpu: Reset MXCSR to default in kernel_fpu_begin() Borislav Petkov
2020-06-19 18:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-06-22 17:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-22 18:33 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-06-22 18:36 ` Petteri Aimonen
2020-06-22 18:38 ` Dave Hansen
2020-06-22 18:40 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-06-22 18:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-19 17:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests/fpu: Add an FPU selftest Borislav Petkov
2020-06-19 18:00 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-06-22 17:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-22 18:26 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-06-22 19:01 ` Borislav Petkov
[not found] ` <B4D00859-000A-4F8C-8CFB-45B9BBCCA16D@amacapital.net>
2020-06-23 10:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-23 18:22 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-06-23 18:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-23 19:07 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-23 19:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-23 20:58 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-23 21:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-20 19:55 ` kernel test robot
2020-06-20 19:55 ` kernel test robot
2020-06-22 17:04 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2020-06-22 17:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-22 18:15 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-22 18:15 ` Nick Desaulniers
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-06-20 10:22 kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200622170446.GG32200@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.