All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>
Cc: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] add support for direct I/O with fscrypt using blk-crypto
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 15:46:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200709224609.GF3855682@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200709194751.2579207-1-satyat@google.com>

On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 07:47:46PM +0000, Satya Tangirala wrote:
> This patch series adds support for direct I/O with fscrypt using
> blk-crypto. It has been rebased on fscrypt/inline-encryption.

Nit: use fscrypt/master instead.  (Eventually I'll delete the
"inline-encryption" branch.)

> Patch 1 adds two functions to fscrypt that need to be called to determine
> if direct I/O is supported for a request.
> 
> Patches 2 and 3 wire up direct-io and iomap respectively with the functions
> introduced in Patch 1 and set bio crypt contexts on bios when appropriate
> by calling into fscrypt.
> 
> Patches 4 and 5 allow ext4 and f2fs direct I/O to support fscrypt without
> falling back to buffered I/O.
> 
> This patch series was tested by running xfstests with test_dummy_encryption
> with and without the 'inlinecrypt' mount option, and there were no
> meaningful regressions. The only regression was for generic/587 on ext4,
> but that test isn't compatible with test_dummy_encryption in the first
> place, and the test "incorrectly" passes without the 'inlinecrypt' mount
> option - a patch will be sent out to exclude that test when
> test_dummy_encryption is turned on with ext4 (like the other quota related
> tests that use user visible quota files).

Note that xfstests has a check that prevents most of the direct I/O tests from
running when the 'test_dummy_encryption' mount option was specified:

_require_odirect()
{
        if [ $FSTYP = "ext4" ] || [ $FSTYP = "f2fs" ] ; then
                if echo "$MOUNT_OPTIONS" | grep -q "test_dummy_encryption"; then
                        _notrun "$FSTYP encryption doesn't support O_DIRECT"
                fi
        fi

We should try changing that check to not skip the test if the 'inlinecrypt'
mount option was also specified.

- Eric

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 0/5] add support for direct I/O with fscrypt using blk-crypto
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 15:46:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200709224609.GF3855682@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200709194751.2579207-1-satyat@google.com>

On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 07:47:46PM +0000, Satya Tangirala wrote:
> This patch series adds support for direct I/O with fscrypt using
> blk-crypto. It has been rebased on fscrypt/inline-encryption.

Nit: use fscrypt/master instead.  (Eventually I'll delete the
"inline-encryption" branch.)

> Patch 1 adds two functions to fscrypt that need to be called to determine
> if direct I/O is supported for a request.
> 
> Patches 2 and 3 wire up direct-io and iomap respectively with the functions
> introduced in Patch 1 and set bio crypt contexts on bios when appropriate
> by calling into fscrypt.
> 
> Patches 4 and 5 allow ext4 and f2fs direct I/O to support fscrypt without
> falling back to buffered I/O.
> 
> This patch series was tested by running xfstests with test_dummy_encryption
> with and without the 'inlinecrypt' mount option, and there were no
> meaningful regressions. The only regression was for generic/587 on ext4,
> but that test isn't compatible with test_dummy_encryption in the first
> place, and the test "incorrectly" passes without the 'inlinecrypt' mount
> option - a patch will be sent out to exclude that test when
> test_dummy_encryption is turned on with ext4 (like the other quota related
> tests that use user visible quota files).

Note that xfstests has a check that prevents most of the direct I/O tests from
running when the 'test_dummy_encryption' mount option was specified:

_require_odirect()
{
        if [ $FSTYP = "ext4" ] || [ $FSTYP = "f2fs" ] ; then
                if echo "$MOUNT_OPTIONS" | grep -q "test_dummy_encryption"; then
                        _notrun "$FSTYP encryption doesn't support O_DIRECT"
                fi
        fi

We should try changing that check to not skip the test if the 'inlinecrypt'
mount option was also specified.

- Eric


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-09 22:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-09 19:47 [PATCH 0/5] add support for direct I/O with fscrypt using blk-crypto Satya Tangirala
2020-07-09 19:47 ` [f2fs-dev] " Satya Tangirala via Linux-f2fs-devel
2020-07-09 19:47 ` [PATCH 1/5] fscrypt: Add functions for direct I/O support Satya Tangirala
2020-07-09 19:47   ` [f2fs-dev] " Satya Tangirala via Linux-f2fs-devel
2020-07-09 21:54   ` Eric Biggers
2020-07-09 21:54     ` [f2fs-dev] " Eric Biggers
2020-07-09 19:47 ` [PATCH 2/5] direct-io: add support for fscrypt using blk-crypto Satya Tangirala
2020-07-09 19:47   ` [f2fs-dev] " Satya Tangirala via Linux-f2fs-devel
2020-07-10  5:34   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-10  5:34     ` [f2fs-dev] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-13 18:36     ` Eric Biggers
2020-07-13 18:36       ` [f2fs-dev] " Eric Biggers
2020-07-17  1:56       ` Satya Tangirala
2020-07-17  1:56         ` [f2fs-dev] " Satya Tangirala via Linux-f2fs-devel
2020-07-09 19:47 ` [PATCH 3/5] iomap: support direct I/O with " Satya Tangirala
2020-07-09 19:47   ` [f2fs-dev] " Satya Tangirala via Linux-f2fs-devel
2020-07-09 21:59   ` Eric Biggers
2020-07-09 21:59     ` [f2fs-dev] " Eric Biggers
2020-07-09 19:47 ` [PATCH 4/5] ext4: " Satya Tangirala
2020-07-09 19:47   ` [f2fs-dev] " Satya Tangirala via Linux-f2fs-devel
2020-07-09 22:30   ` Eric Biggers
2020-07-09 22:30     ` [f2fs-dev] " Eric Biggers
2020-07-09 19:47 ` [PATCH 5/5] f2fs: " Satya Tangirala
2020-07-09 19:47   ` [f2fs-dev] " Satya Tangirala via Linux-f2fs-devel
2020-07-10  1:05   ` Chao Yu
2020-07-10  1:05     ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2020-07-10  1:15     ` Eric Biggers
2020-07-10  1:15       ` [f2fs-dev] " Eric Biggers
2020-07-09 22:46 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2020-07-09 22:46   ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 0/5] add support for " Eric Biggers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200709224609.GF3855682@gmail.com \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=satyat@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.