From: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
To: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, timur@kernel.org,
Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
tiwai@suse.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org,
festevam@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ASoC: fsl_sai: Refine enable and disable sequence for synchronous mode
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 21:11:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200805041111.GB10174@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1596594233-13489-3-git-send-email-shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 10:23:53AM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> Tx synchronous with Rx:
> The TCSR.TE is no need to enabled when only Rx is going to be enabled.
> Check if need to disable RSCR.RE before disabling TCSR.TE.
>
> Rx synchronous with Tx:
> The RCSR.RE is no need to enabled when only Tx is going to be enabled.
> Check if need to disable TSCR.RE before disabling RCSR.TE.
Please add to the commit log more context such as what we have
discussed: what's the problem of the current driver, and why we
_have_to_ apply this change though it's sightly against what RM
recommends.
(If thing is straightforward, it's okay to make the text short.
Yet I believe that this change deserves more than these lines.)
One info that you should mention -- also the main reason why I'm
convinced to add this change: trigger() is still in the shape of
the early version where we only supported one operation mode --
Tx synchronous with Rx. So we need an update for other modes.
> Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
The git-diff part looks good, please add this in next ver.:
Reviewed-by: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
Btw, the new fsl_sai_dir_is_synced() can be probably applied to
other places with a followup patch.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
To: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, timur@kernel.org,
Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
tiwai@suse.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com, perex@perex.cz,
broonie@kernel.org, festevam@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ASoC: fsl_sai: Refine enable and disable sequence for synchronous mode
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 21:11:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200805041111.GB10174@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1596594233-13489-3-git-send-email-shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 10:23:53AM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> Tx synchronous with Rx:
> The TCSR.TE is no need to enabled when only Rx is going to be enabled.
> Check if need to disable RSCR.RE before disabling TCSR.TE.
>
> Rx synchronous with Tx:
> The RCSR.RE is no need to enabled when only Tx is going to be enabled.
> Check if need to disable TSCR.RE before disabling RCSR.TE.
Please add to the commit log more context such as what we have
discussed: what's the problem of the current driver, and why we
_have_to_ apply this change though it's sightly against what RM
recommends.
(If thing is straightforward, it's okay to make the text short.
Yet I believe that this change deserves more than these lines.)
One info that you should mention -- also the main reason why I'm
convinced to add this change: trigger() is still in the shape of
the early version where we only supported one operation mode --
Tx synchronous with Rx. So we need an update for other modes.
> Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
The git-diff part looks good, please add this in next ver.:
Reviewed-by: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
Btw, the new fsl_sai_dir_is_synced() can be probably applied to
other places with a followup patch.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
To: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
Cc: timur@kernel.org, Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com, festevam@gmail.com,
lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, perex@perex.cz,
tiwai@suse.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ASoC: fsl_sai: Refine enable and disable sequence for synchronous mode
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 21:11:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200805041111.GB10174@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1596594233-13489-3-git-send-email-shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 10:23:53AM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> Tx synchronous with Rx:
> The TCSR.TE is no need to enabled when only Rx is going to be enabled.
> Check if need to disable RSCR.RE before disabling TCSR.TE.
>
> Rx synchronous with Tx:
> The RCSR.RE is no need to enabled when only Tx is going to be enabled.
> Check if need to disable TSCR.RE before disabling RCSR.TE.
Please add to the commit log more context such as what we have
discussed: what's the problem of the current driver, and why we
_have_to_ apply this change though it's sightly against what RM
recommends.
(If thing is straightforward, it's okay to make the text short.
Yet I believe that this change deserves more than these lines.)
One info that you should mention -- also the main reason why I'm
convinced to add this change: trigger() is still in the shape of
the early version where we only supported one operation mode --
Tx synchronous with Rx. So we need an update for other modes.
> Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
The git-diff part looks good, please add this in next ver.:
Reviewed-by: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
Btw, the new fsl_sai_dir_is_synced() can be probably applied to
other places with a followup patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-05 4:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-05 2:23 [PATCH v2 0/2] refine and clean code for synchronous mode Shengjiu Wang
2020-08-05 2:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ASoC: fsl_sai: Clean " Shengjiu Wang
2020-08-05 3:43 ` Nicolin Chen
2020-08-05 3:43 ` Nicolin Chen
2020-08-05 3:43 ` Nicolin Chen
2020-08-05 2:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ASoC: fsl_sai: Refine enable and disable sequence " Shengjiu Wang
2020-08-05 4:11 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2020-08-05 4:11 ` Nicolin Chen
2020-08-05 4:11 ` Nicolin Chen
2020-08-05 5:03 ` Shengjiu Wang
2020-08-05 5:03 ` Shengjiu Wang
2020-08-05 5:15 ` Nicolin Chen
2020-08-05 5:15 ` Nicolin Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200805041111.GB10174@Asurada-Nvidia \
--to=nicoleotsuka@gmail.com \
--cc=Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=shengjiu.wang@nxp.com \
--cc=timur@kernel.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.