From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Cc: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, o.rempel@pengutronix.de,
robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shawnguo@kernel.org,
s.hauer@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de,
festevam@gmail.com, linux-imx@nxp.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] remoteproc: imx_rproc: make syscon optional
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 16:40:29 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200811224029.GE3370567@xps15> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200724080813.24884-5-peng.fan@nxp.com>
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 04:08:07PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> Make syscon optional, since i.MX8QM/QXP/7ULP not have SRC to control M4.
> But currently i.MX8QM/QXP/7ULP not added, so still check regmap
> when start/stop to avoid unhappy things.
>
> Reviewed-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> index 82594a800a1b..4fad5c0b1c05 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> @@ -162,6 +162,9 @@ static int imx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
> struct device *dev = priv->dev;
> int ret;
>
> + if (!priv->regmap)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
Proceeding this way is hard to maintain. I would perfer to add specific
operations based on the scenario or coprocessor we are working with.
> +
> ret = regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, dcfg->src_reg,
> dcfg->src_mask, dcfg->src_start);
> if (ret)
> @@ -177,6 +180,9 @@ static int imx_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
> struct device *dev = priv->dev;
> int ret;
>
> + if (!priv->regmap)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> ret = regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, dcfg->src_reg,
> dcfg->src_mask, dcfg->src_stop);
> if (ret)
> @@ -325,9 +331,10 @@ static int imx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> regmap = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(np, "syscon");
> if (IS_ERR(regmap)) {
> dev_err(dev, "failed to find syscon\n");
> - return PTR_ERR(regmap);
> + regmap = NULL;
> + } else {
> + regmap_attach_dev(dev, regmap, &config);
Here you are altering how all the existing implemenation are currently working.
Add a new field to imx_rproc_dcfg and based on that, determine if a regmap is
mandatory or not.
> }
> - regmap_attach_dev(dev, regmap, &config);
>
> /* set some other name then imx */
> rproc = rproc_alloc(dev, "imx-rproc", &imx_rproc_ops,
> --
> 2.16.4
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, festevam@gmail.com,
s.hauer@pengutronix.de, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org,
o.rempel@pengutronix.de, robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-imx@nxp.com,
kernel@pengutronix.de, shawnguo@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] remoteproc: imx_rproc: make syscon optional
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 16:40:29 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200811224029.GE3370567@xps15> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200724080813.24884-5-peng.fan@nxp.com>
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 04:08:07PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> Make syscon optional, since i.MX8QM/QXP/7ULP not have SRC to control M4.
> But currently i.MX8QM/QXP/7ULP not added, so still check regmap
> when start/stop to avoid unhappy things.
>
> Reviewed-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> index 82594a800a1b..4fad5c0b1c05 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> @@ -162,6 +162,9 @@ static int imx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
> struct device *dev = priv->dev;
> int ret;
>
> + if (!priv->regmap)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
Proceeding this way is hard to maintain. I would perfer to add specific
operations based on the scenario or coprocessor we are working with.
> +
> ret = regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, dcfg->src_reg,
> dcfg->src_mask, dcfg->src_start);
> if (ret)
> @@ -177,6 +180,9 @@ static int imx_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
> struct device *dev = priv->dev;
> int ret;
>
> + if (!priv->regmap)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> ret = regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, dcfg->src_reg,
> dcfg->src_mask, dcfg->src_stop);
> if (ret)
> @@ -325,9 +331,10 @@ static int imx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> regmap = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(np, "syscon");
> if (IS_ERR(regmap)) {
> dev_err(dev, "failed to find syscon\n");
> - return PTR_ERR(regmap);
> + regmap = NULL;
> + } else {
> + regmap_attach_dev(dev, regmap, &config);
Here you are altering how all the existing implemenation are currently working.
Add a new field to imx_rproc_dcfg and based on that, determine if a regmap is
mandatory or not.
> }
> - regmap_attach_dev(dev, regmap, &config);
>
> /* set some other name then imx */
> rproc = rproc_alloc(dev, "imx-rproc", &imx_rproc_ops,
> --
> 2.16.4
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-11 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-24 8:08 [PATCH 00/10] remoteproc: imx_rproc: support iMX8M and early boot Peng Fan
2020-07-24 8:08 ` Peng Fan
2020-07-24 8:08 ` [PATCH 01/10] dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx_rproc: add i.MX8MQ/M Peng Fan
2020-07-24 8:08 ` Peng Fan
2020-07-31 20:14 ` Rob Herring
2020-07-31 20:14 ` Rob Herring
2020-07-24 8:08 ` [PATCH 02/10] remoteproc: imx_rproc: correct err message Peng Fan
2020-07-24 8:08 ` Peng Fan
2020-08-11 19:56 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-08-11 19:56 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-07-24 8:08 ` [PATCH 03/10] remoteproc: imx: use devm_ioremap Peng Fan
2020-07-24 8:08 ` Peng Fan
2020-07-27 6:23 ` Oleksij Rempel
2020-07-27 6:23 ` Oleksij Rempel
2020-07-27 6:28 ` Peng Fan
2020-07-27 6:28 ` Peng Fan
2020-07-27 6:41 ` Oleksij Rempel
2020-07-27 6:41 ` Oleksij Rempel
2020-07-27 6:51 ` Peng Fan
2020-07-27 6:51 ` Peng Fan
2020-07-27 7:37 ` Oleksij Rempel
2020-07-27 7:37 ` Oleksij Rempel
2020-07-27 8:11 ` Peng Fan
2020-07-27 8:11 ` Peng Fan
2020-07-28 7:20 ` Oleksij Rempel
2020-07-28 7:20 ` Oleksij Rempel
2020-07-24 8:08 ` [PATCH 04/10] remoteproc: imx_rproc: make syscon optional Peng Fan
2020-07-24 8:08 ` Peng Fan
2020-08-11 22:40 ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
2020-08-11 22:40 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-08-18 21:43 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-08-18 21:43 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-08-19 0:51 ` Peng Fan
2020-08-19 0:51 ` Peng Fan
2020-08-19 19:45 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-08-19 19:45 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-08-20 2:04 ` Peng Fan
2020-08-20 2:04 ` Peng Fan
2020-08-20 19:27 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-08-20 19:27 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-07-24 8:08 ` [PATCH 05/10] remoteproc: imx_rproc: make clk optional Peng Fan
2020-07-24 8:08 ` Peng Fan
2020-07-24 8:08 ` [PATCH 06/10] remoteproc: imx_rproc: add load hook Peng Fan
2020-07-24 8:08 ` Peng Fan
2020-07-27 5:20 ` Oleksij Rempel
2020-07-27 5:20 ` Oleksij Rempel
2020-08-11 21:40 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-08-11 21:40 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-07-24 8:08 ` [PATCH 07/10] remoteproc: imx_rproc: add i.MX specific parse fw hook Peng Fan
2020-07-24 8:08 ` Peng Fan
2020-08-11 21:56 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-08-11 21:56 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-07-24 8:08 ` [PATCH 08/10] remoteproc: imx_rproc: support i.MX8MQ/M Peng Fan
2020-07-24 8:08 ` Peng Fan
2020-07-24 8:08 ` [PATCH 09/10] remoteproc: imx_proc: enable virtio/mailbox Peng Fan
2020-07-24 8:08 ` Peng Fan
2020-07-24 8:08 ` [PATCH 10/10] remoteproc: imx_rproc: support coproc booting before Linux Peng Fan
2020-07-24 8:08 ` Peng Fan
2020-08-11 22:36 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-08-11 22:36 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-07-27 6:38 ` [PATCH 00/10] remoteproc: imx_rproc: support iMX8M and early boot Oleksij Rempel
2020-07-27 6:38 ` Oleksij Rempel
2020-07-27 6:44 ` Peng Fan
2020-07-27 6:44 ` Peng Fan
2020-07-27 7:54 ` Oleksij Rempel
2020-07-27 7:54 ` Oleksij Rempel
2020-07-27 9:18 ` Peng Fan
2020-07-27 9:18 ` Peng Fan
2020-07-28 7:26 ` Oleksij Rempel
2020-07-28 7:26 ` Oleksij Rempel
2020-07-28 7:50 ` Peng Fan
2020-07-28 7:50 ` Peng Fan
2020-07-28 7:55 ` Oleksij Rempel
2020-07-28 7:55 ` Oleksij Rempel
2020-07-28 9:36 ` Peng Fan
2020-07-28 9:36 ` Peng Fan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200811224029.GE3370567@xps15 \
--to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.