All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
	frankja@linux.ibm.com, jasowang@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	thomas.lendacky@amd.com, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au,
	linuxram@us.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 03:57:30 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200908035506-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200908003951.233e47f3.pasic@linux.ibm.com>

On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 12:39:51AM +0200, Halil Pasic wrote:
> On Mon,  7 Sep 2020 11:39:05 +0200
> Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > The goal of the series is to give a chance to the architecture
> > to validate VIRTIO device features.
> 
> Michael, is this going in via your tree?

I guess so. Still not really happy about second-guessing
the hypervisor, but this got acks from others
so maybe I'm wrong in this instance. Won't be the first time.

-- 
MST

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: gor@linux.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	frankja@linux.ibm.com, Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>,
	thomas.lendacky@amd.com, cohuck@redhat.com, linuxram@us.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	borntraeger@de.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, hca@linux.ibm.com,
	david@gibson.dropbear.id.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 03:57:30 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200908035506-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200908003951.233e47f3.pasic@linux.ibm.com>

On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 12:39:51AM +0200, Halil Pasic wrote:
> On Mon,  7 Sep 2020 11:39:05 +0200
> Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > The goal of the series is to give a chance to the architecture
> > to validate VIRTIO device features.
> 
> Michael, is this going in via your tree?

I guess so. Still not really happy about second-guessing
the hypervisor, but this got acks from others
so maybe I'm wrong in this instance. Won't be the first time.

-- 
MST

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-09-08  7:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-07  9:39 [PATCH v11 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features Pierre Morel
2020-09-07  9:39 ` Pierre Morel
2020-09-07  9:39 ` [PATCH v11 1/2] virtio: let arch advertise guest's memory access restrictions Pierre Morel
2020-09-07  9:39   ` Pierre Morel
2020-09-07 22:22   ` Halil Pasic
2020-09-07 22:22     ` Halil Pasic
2020-09-07  9:39 ` [PATCH v11 2/2] s390: virtio: PV needs VIRTIO I/O device protection Pierre Morel
2020-09-07  9:39   ` Pierre Morel
2020-09-07 22:37   ` Halil Pasic
2020-09-07 22:37     ` Halil Pasic
2020-09-08 13:39   ` kernel test robot
2020-09-08 13:39     ` kernel test robot
2020-09-07 22:39 ` [PATCH v11 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features Halil Pasic
2020-09-07 22:39   ` Halil Pasic
2020-09-08  6:55   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-09-08  6:55     ` Cornelia Huck
2020-09-08  8:35     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-09-08  8:35       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-09-08  7:57   ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2020-09-08  7:57     ` Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200908035506-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.