From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
frankja@linux.ibm.com, mst@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
thomas.lendacky@amd.com, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au,
linuxram@us.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 08:55:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200908085521.4db22680.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200908003951.233e47f3.pasic@linux.ibm.com>
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 00:39:51 +0200
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 11:39:05 +0200
> Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The goal of the series is to give a chance to the architecture
> > to validate VIRTIO device features.
>
> Michael, is this going in via your tree?
>
I believe Michael's tree is the right place for this, but I can also
queue it if I get an ack on patch 1.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: gor@linux.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
frankja@linux.ibm.com, Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>,
mst@redhat.com, linuxram@us.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
thomas.lendacky@amd.com, hca@linux.ibm.com,
david@gibson.dropbear.id.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 08:55:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200908085521.4db22680.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200908003951.233e47f3.pasic@linux.ibm.com>
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 00:39:51 +0200
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 11:39:05 +0200
> Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The goal of the series is to give a chance to the architecture
> > to validate VIRTIO device features.
>
> Michael, is this going in via your tree?
>
I believe Michael's tree is the right place for this, but I can also
queue it if I get an ack on patch 1.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-08 6:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-07 9:39 [PATCH v11 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features Pierre Morel
2020-09-07 9:39 ` Pierre Morel
2020-09-07 9:39 ` [PATCH v11 1/2] virtio: let arch advertise guest's memory access restrictions Pierre Morel
2020-09-07 9:39 ` Pierre Morel
2020-09-07 22:22 ` Halil Pasic
2020-09-07 22:22 ` Halil Pasic
2020-09-07 9:39 ` [PATCH v11 2/2] s390: virtio: PV needs VIRTIO I/O device protection Pierre Morel
2020-09-07 9:39 ` Pierre Morel
2020-09-07 22:37 ` Halil Pasic
2020-09-07 22:37 ` Halil Pasic
2020-09-08 13:39 ` kernel test robot
2020-09-08 13:39 ` kernel test robot
2020-09-07 22:39 ` [PATCH v11 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features Halil Pasic
2020-09-07 22:39 ` Halil Pasic
2020-09-08 6:55 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2020-09-08 6:55 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-09-08 8:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-09-08 8:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-09-08 7:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-09-08 7:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200908085521.4db22680.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.