From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Robert Richter <rrichter@marvell.com>,
York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Add L1 and L2 error detection for A53 and A57
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 16:04:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201014140429.GE13710@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201014132511.GA1517487@bogus>
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 08:25:11AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 02:50:30PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > This driver is based on an earlier version from York Sun which can
> > be found here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/14/1203.
> >
> > At that time the conclusion was that this driver is not suitable for
> > mainline as it used IMPLEMENTATION DEFINED CPU registers and also
> > NXP specific SMC calls. All this was used for the error injection only,
> > for error reporting it is not needed.
>
> Have you looked at Amazon's version:
> http://lore.kernel.org/r/20200510151310.17372-2-hhhawa@amazon.com
No, I was not aware of that driver. It's basically the same driver, but
limited to a single SoC. Looks like at least some things are better in
that driver, read_sysreg_s(ARM_CA57_L2MERRSR_EL1) reads better than my
open coded variant.
>
> Which is an A57 EDAC driver. Looks like it never got upstream though,
> but it's not clear why.
>
> You'll note that it doesn't have a virtual DT node either.
Testing the SoC type in an initcall looks odd to me. Wouldn't a
dedicated node be preferred?
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Robert Richter <rrichter@marvell.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Add L1 and L2 error detection for A53 and A57
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 16:04:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201014140429.GE13710@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201014132511.GA1517487@bogus>
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 08:25:11AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 02:50:30PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > This driver is based on an earlier version from York Sun which can
> > be found here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/14/1203.
> >
> > At that time the conclusion was that this driver is not suitable for
> > mainline as it used IMPLEMENTATION DEFINED CPU registers and also
> > NXP specific SMC calls. All this was used for the error injection only,
> > for error reporting it is not needed.
>
> Have you looked at Amazon's version:
> http://lore.kernel.org/r/20200510151310.17372-2-hhhawa@amazon.com
No, I was not aware of that driver. It's basically the same driver, but
limited to a single SoC. Looks like at least some things are better in
that driver, read_sysreg_s(ARM_CA57_L2MERRSR_EL1) reads better than my
open coded variant.
>
> Which is an A57 EDAC driver. Looks like it never got upstream though,
> but it's not clear why.
>
> You'll note that it doesn't have a virtual DT node either.
Testing the SoC type in an initcall looks odd to me. Wouldn't a
dedicated node be preferred?
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-14 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-13 12:50 [PATCH v2 0/3] Add L1 and L2 error detection for A53 and A57 Sascha Hauer
2020-10-13 12:50 ` Sascha Hauer
2020-10-13 12:50 ` [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: edac: Add binding for L1/L2 error detection for Cortex A53/57 Sascha Hauer
2020-10-13 12:50 ` Sascha Hauer
2020-10-14 13:25 ` Rob Herring
2020-10-14 13:25 ` Rob Herring
2020-10-13 12:50 ` [PATCH 2/3] drivers/edac: Add L1 and L2 error detection for A53 and A57 Sascha Hauer
2020-10-13 12:50 ` Sascha Hauer
2020-11-06 19:34 ` James Morse
2020-11-06 19:34 ` James Morse
2020-10-13 12:50 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: ls104x: Add L1/L2 cache edac node Sascha Hauer
2020-10-13 12:50 ` Sascha Hauer
2020-10-14 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Add L1 and L2 error detection for A53 and A57 Rob Herring
2020-10-14 13:25 ` Rob Herring
2020-10-14 14:04 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2020-10-14 14:04 ` Sascha Hauer
2020-10-14 15:17 ` Rob Herring
2020-10-14 15:17 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201014140429.GE13710@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rrichter@marvell.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=york.sun@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.