All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 14/26] KVM: arm64: Add consistency checking for frac fields of ID registers
Date: Wed,  5 Jan 2022 20:26:56 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220106042708.2869332-15-reijiw@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220106042708.2869332-1-reijiw@google.com>

Feature fractional field of an ID register cannot be simply validated
at KVM_SET_ONE_REG because its validity depends on its (main) feature
field value, which could be in a different ID register (and might be
set later).
Validate fractional fields at the first KVM_RUN instead.

Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h |   1 +
 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c              |   3 +
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c         | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 4509f9e7472d..7b3f86bd6a6b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -750,6 +750,7 @@ long kvm_vm_ioctl_mte_copy_tags(struct kvm *kvm,
 
 void set_default_id_regs(struct kvm *kvm);
 int kvm_set_id_reg_feature(struct kvm *kvm, u32 id, u8 field_shift, u8 fval);
+int kvm_id_regs_consistency_check(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 
 /* Guest/host FPSIMD coordination helpers */
 int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index 5f497a0af254..16fc2ce32069 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -596,6 +596,9 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_first_run_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	if (!kvm_arm_vcpu_is_finalized(vcpu))
 		return -EPERM;
 
+	if (!kvm_vm_is_protected(kvm) && kvm_id_regs_consistency_check(vcpu))
+		return -EPERM;
+
 	vcpu->arch.has_run_once = true;
 
 	kvm_arm_vcpu_init_debug(vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index ddbeefc3881c..6adb7b04620c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -756,9 +756,6 @@ static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr0_el1_info = {
 
 static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr1_el1_info = {
 	.sys_reg = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
-	.ignore_mask = ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_RASFRAC) |
-		       ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_MPAMFRAC) |
-		       ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_CSV2FRAC),
 	.init = init_id_aa64pfr1_el1_info,
 	.validate = validate_id_aa64pfr1_el1,
 	.vcpu_mask = vcpu_mask_id_aa64pfr1_el1,
@@ -3434,10 +3431,109 @@ int kvm_arm_copy_sys_reg_indices(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *uindices)
 	return write_demux_regids(uindices);
 }
 
+/* ID register's fractional field information with its feature field. */
+struct feature_frac {
+	u32	id;
+	u32	shift;
+	u32	frac_id;
+	u32	frac_shift;
+	u8	frac_ftr_check;
+};
+
+static struct feature_frac feature_frac_table[] = {
+	{
+		.frac_id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
+		.frac_shift = ID_AA64PFR1_RASFRAC_SHIFT,
+		.id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
+		.shift = ID_AA64PFR0_RAS_SHIFT,
+	},
+	{
+		.frac_id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
+		.frac_shift = ID_AA64PFR1_MPAMFRAC_SHIFT,
+		.id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
+		.shift = ID_AA64PFR0_MPAM_SHIFT,
+	},
+	{
+		.frac_id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
+		.frac_shift = ID_AA64PFR1_CSV2FRAC_SHIFT,
+		.id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
+		.shift = ID_AA64PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT,
+	},
+};
+
+/*
+ * Return non-zero if the feature/fractional fields pair are not
+ * supported. Return zero otherwise.
+ * This function validates only the fractional feature field,
+ * and relies on the fact the feature field is validated before
+ * through arm64_check_features.
+ */
+static int vcpu_id_reg_feature_frac_check(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+					  const struct feature_frac *ftr_frac)
+{
+	const struct id_reg_info *id_reg;
+	u32 id;
+	u64 val, lim, mask;
+
+	/* Check if the feature field value is same as the limit */
+	id = ftr_frac->id;
+	id_reg = GET_ID_REG_INFO(id);
+
+	mask = (u64)ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_MASK << ftr_frac->shift;
+	val = __read_id_reg(vcpu, id) & mask;
+	lim = id_reg ? id_reg->vcpu_limit_val : read_sanitised_ftr_reg(id);
+	lim &= mask;
+
+	if (val != lim)
+		/*
+		 * The feature level is lower than the limit.
+		 * Any fractional version should be fine.
+		 */
+		return 0;
+
+	/* Check the fractional feature field */
+	id = ftr_frac->frac_id;
+	id_reg = GET_ID_REG_INFO(id);
+
+	mask = (u64)ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_MASK << ftr_frac->frac_shift;
+	val = __read_id_reg(vcpu, id) & mask;
+	lim = id_reg ? id_reg->vcpu_limit_val : read_sanitised_ftr_reg(id);
+	lim &= mask;
+
+	if (val == lim)
+		/*
+		 * Both the feature and fractional fields are the same
+		 * as limit.
+		 */
+		return 0;
+
+	return arm64_check_features(id, val, lim);
+}
+
+int kvm_id_regs_consistency_check(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	int i, err;
+	const struct feature_frac *frac;
+
+	/*
+	 * Check ID registers' fractional fields, which aren't checked
+	 * at KVM_SET_ONE_REG.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(feature_frac_table); i++) {
+		frac = &feature_frac_table[i];
+		err = vcpu_id_reg_feature_frac_check(vcpu, frac);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static void id_reg_info_init_all(void)
 {
 	int i;
 	struct id_reg_info *id_reg;
+	struct feature_frac *frac;
+	u64 ftr_mask = ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_MASK;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(id_reg_info_table); i++) {
 		id_reg = (struct id_reg_info *)id_reg_info_table[i];
@@ -3446,6 +3542,20 @@ static void id_reg_info_init_all(void)
 
 		id_reg_info_init(id_reg);
 	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Update ignore_mask of ID registers based on fractional fields
+	 * information.  Any ID register that have fractional fields
+	 * is expected to have its own id_reg_info.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(feature_frac_table); i++) {
+		frac = &feature_frac_table[i];
+		id_reg = GET_ID_REG_INFO(frac->frac_id);
+		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!id_reg))
+			continue;
+
+		id_reg->ignore_mask |= ftr_mask << frac->frac_shift;
+	}
 }
 
 void kvm_sys_reg_table_init(void)
-- 
2.34.1.448.ga2b2bfdf31-goog

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	 James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	 Peng Liang <liangpeng10@huawei.com>,
	Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
	 Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>,
	 Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
	Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@google.com>,
	Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 14/26] KVM: arm64: Add consistency checking for frac fields of ID registers
Date: Wed,  5 Jan 2022 20:26:56 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220106042708.2869332-15-reijiw@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220106042708.2869332-1-reijiw@google.com>

Feature fractional field of an ID register cannot be simply validated
at KVM_SET_ONE_REG because its validity depends on its (main) feature
field value, which could be in a different ID register (and might be
set later).
Validate fractional fields at the first KVM_RUN instead.

Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h |   1 +
 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c              |   3 +
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c         | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 4509f9e7472d..7b3f86bd6a6b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -750,6 +750,7 @@ long kvm_vm_ioctl_mte_copy_tags(struct kvm *kvm,
 
 void set_default_id_regs(struct kvm *kvm);
 int kvm_set_id_reg_feature(struct kvm *kvm, u32 id, u8 field_shift, u8 fval);
+int kvm_id_regs_consistency_check(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 
 /* Guest/host FPSIMD coordination helpers */
 int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index 5f497a0af254..16fc2ce32069 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -596,6 +596,9 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_first_run_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	if (!kvm_arm_vcpu_is_finalized(vcpu))
 		return -EPERM;
 
+	if (!kvm_vm_is_protected(kvm) && kvm_id_regs_consistency_check(vcpu))
+		return -EPERM;
+
 	vcpu->arch.has_run_once = true;
 
 	kvm_arm_vcpu_init_debug(vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index ddbeefc3881c..6adb7b04620c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -756,9 +756,6 @@ static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr0_el1_info = {
 
 static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr1_el1_info = {
 	.sys_reg = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
-	.ignore_mask = ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_RASFRAC) |
-		       ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_MPAMFRAC) |
-		       ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_CSV2FRAC),
 	.init = init_id_aa64pfr1_el1_info,
 	.validate = validate_id_aa64pfr1_el1,
 	.vcpu_mask = vcpu_mask_id_aa64pfr1_el1,
@@ -3434,10 +3431,109 @@ int kvm_arm_copy_sys_reg_indices(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *uindices)
 	return write_demux_regids(uindices);
 }
 
+/* ID register's fractional field information with its feature field. */
+struct feature_frac {
+	u32	id;
+	u32	shift;
+	u32	frac_id;
+	u32	frac_shift;
+	u8	frac_ftr_check;
+};
+
+static struct feature_frac feature_frac_table[] = {
+	{
+		.frac_id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
+		.frac_shift = ID_AA64PFR1_RASFRAC_SHIFT,
+		.id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
+		.shift = ID_AA64PFR0_RAS_SHIFT,
+	},
+	{
+		.frac_id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
+		.frac_shift = ID_AA64PFR1_MPAMFRAC_SHIFT,
+		.id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
+		.shift = ID_AA64PFR0_MPAM_SHIFT,
+	},
+	{
+		.frac_id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
+		.frac_shift = ID_AA64PFR1_CSV2FRAC_SHIFT,
+		.id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
+		.shift = ID_AA64PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT,
+	},
+};
+
+/*
+ * Return non-zero if the feature/fractional fields pair are not
+ * supported. Return zero otherwise.
+ * This function validates only the fractional feature field,
+ * and relies on the fact the feature field is validated before
+ * through arm64_check_features.
+ */
+static int vcpu_id_reg_feature_frac_check(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+					  const struct feature_frac *ftr_frac)
+{
+	const struct id_reg_info *id_reg;
+	u32 id;
+	u64 val, lim, mask;
+
+	/* Check if the feature field value is same as the limit */
+	id = ftr_frac->id;
+	id_reg = GET_ID_REG_INFO(id);
+
+	mask = (u64)ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_MASK << ftr_frac->shift;
+	val = __read_id_reg(vcpu, id) & mask;
+	lim = id_reg ? id_reg->vcpu_limit_val : read_sanitised_ftr_reg(id);
+	lim &= mask;
+
+	if (val != lim)
+		/*
+		 * The feature level is lower than the limit.
+		 * Any fractional version should be fine.
+		 */
+		return 0;
+
+	/* Check the fractional feature field */
+	id = ftr_frac->frac_id;
+	id_reg = GET_ID_REG_INFO(id);
+
+	mask = (u64)ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_MASK << ftr_frac->frac_shift;
+	val = __read_id_reg(vcpu, id) & mask;
+	lim = id_reg ? id_reg->vcpu_limit_val : read_sanitised_ftr_reg(id);
+	lim &= mask;
+
+	if (val == lim)
+		/*
+		 * Both the feature and fractional fields are the same
+		 * as limit.
+		 */
+		return 0;
+
+	return arm64_check_features(id, val, lim);
+}
+
+int kvm_id_regs_consistency_check(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	int i, err;
+	const struct feature_frac *frac;
+
+	/*
+	 * Check ID registers' fractional fields, which aren't checked
+	 * at KVM_SET_ONE_REG.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(feature_frac_table); i++) {
+		frac = &feature_frac_table[i];
+		err = vcpu_id_reg_feature_frac_check(vcpu, frac);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static void id_reg_info_init_all(void)
 {
 	int i;
 	struct id_reg_info *id_reg;
+	struct feature_frac *frac;
+	u64 ftr_mask = ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_MASK;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(id_reg_info_table); i++) {
 		id_reg = (struct id_reg_info *)id_reg_info_table[i];
@@ -3446,6 +3542,20 @@ static void id_reg_info_init_all(void)
 
 		id_reg_info_init(id_reg);
 	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Update ignore_mask of ID registers based on fractional fields
+	 * information.  Any ID register that have fractional fields
+	 * is expected to have its own id_reg_info.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(feature_frac_table); i++) {
+		frac = &feature_frac_table[i];
+		id_reg = GET_ID_REG_INFO(frac->frac_id);
+		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!id_reg))
+			continue;
+
+		id_reg->ignore_mask |= ftr_mask << frac->frac_shift;
+	}
 }
 
 void kvm_sys_reg_table_init(void)
-- 
2.34.1.448.ga2b2bfdf31-goog


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	Peng Liang <liangpeng10@huawei.com>,
	Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
	Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>,
	Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
	Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@google.com>,
	Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 14/26] KVM: arm64: Add consistency checking for frac fields of ID registers
Date: Wed,  5 Jan 2022 20:26:56 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220106042708.2869332-15-reijiw@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220106042708.2869332-1-reijiw@google.com>

Feature fractional field of an ID register cannot be simply validated
at KVM_SET_ONE_REG because its validity depends on its (main) feature
field value, which could be in a different ID register (and might be
set later).
Validate fractional fields at the first KVM_RUN instead.

Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h |   1 +
 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c              |   3 +
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c         | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 4509f9e7472d..7b3f86bd6a6b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -750,6 +750,7 @@ long kvm_vm_ioctl_mte_copy_tags(struct kvm *kvm,
 
 void set_default_id_regs(struct kvm *kvm);
 int kvm_set_id_reg_feature(struct kvm *kvm, u32 id, u8 field_shift, u8 fval);
+int kvm_id_regs_consistency_check(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 
 /* Guest/host FPSIMD coordination helpers */
 int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index 5f497a0af254..16fc2ce32069 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -596,6 +596,9 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_first_run_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	if (!kvm_arm_vcpu_is_finalized(vcpu))
 		return -EPERM;
 
+	if (!kvm_vm_is_protected(kvm) && kvm_id_regs_consistency_check(vcpu))
+		return -EPERM;
+
 	vcpu->arch.has_run_once = true;
 
 	kvm_arm_vcpu_init_debug(vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index ddbeefc3881c..6adb7b04620c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -756,9 +756,6 @@ static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr0_el1_info = {
 
 static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr1_el1_info = {
 	.sys_reg = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
-	.ignore_mask = ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_RASFRAC) |
-		       ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_MPAMFRAC) |
-		       ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_CSV2FRAC),
 	.init = init_id_aa64pfr1_el1_info,
 	.validate = validate_id_aa64pfr1_el1,
 	.vcpu_mask = vcpu_mask_id_aa64pfr1_el1,
@@ -3434,10 +3431,109 @@ int kvm_arm_copy_sys_reg_indices(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *uindices)
 	return write_demux_regids(uindices);
 }
 
+/* ID register's fractional field information with its feature field. */
+struct feature_frac {
+	u32	id;
+	u32	shift;
+	u32	frac_id;
+	u32	frac_shift;
+	u8	frac_ftr_check;
+};
+
+static struct feature_frac feature_frac_table[] = {
+	{
+		.frac_id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
+		.frac_shift = ID_AA64PFR1_RASFRAC_SHIFT,
+		.id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
+		.shift = ID_AA64PFR0_RAS_SHIFT,
+	},
+	{
+		.frac_id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
+		.frac_shift = ID_AA64PFR1_MPAMFRAC_SHIFT,
+		.id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
+		.shift = ID_AA64PFR0_MPAM_SHIFT,
+	},
+	{
+		.frac_id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
+		.frac_shift = ID_AA64PFR1_CSV2FRAC_SHIFT,
+		.id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
+		.shift = ID_AA64PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT,
+	},
+};
+
+/*
+ * Return non-zero if the feature/fractional fields pair are not
+ * supported. Return zero otherwise.
+ * This function validates only the fractional feature field,
+ * and relies on the fact the feature field is validated before
+ * through arm64_check_features.
+ */
+static int vcpu_id_reg_feature_frac_check(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+					  const struct feature_frac *ftr_frac)
+{
+	const struct id_reg_info *id_reg;
+	u32 id;
+	u64 val, lim, mask;
+
+	/* Check if the feature field value is same as the limit */
+	id = ftr_frac->id;
+	id_reg = GET_ID_REG_INFO(id);
+
+	mask = (u64)ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_MASK << ftr_frac->shift;
+	val = __read_id_reg(vcpu, id) & mask;
+	lim = id_reg ? id_reg->vcpu_limit_val : read_sanitised_ftr_reg(id);
+	lim &= mask;
+
+	if (val != lim)
+		/*
+		 * The feature level is lower than the limit.
+		 * Any fractional version should be fine.
+		 */
+		return 0;
+
+	/* Check the fractional feature field */
+	id = ftr_frac->frac_id;
+	id_reg = GET_ID_REG_INFO(id);
+
+	mask = (u64)ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_MASK << ftr_frac->frac_shift;
+	val = __read_id_reg(vcpu, id) & mask;
+	lim = id_reg ? id_reg->vcpu_limit_val : read_sanitised_ftr_reg(id);
+	lim &= mask;
+
+	if (val == lim)
+		/*
+		 * Both the feature and fractional fields are the same
+		 * as limit.
+		 */
+		return 0;
+
+	return arm64_check_features(id, val, lim);
+}
+
+int kvm_id_regs_consistency_check(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	int i, err;
+	const struct feature_frac *frac;
+
+	/*
+	 * Check ID registers' fractional fields, which aren't checked
+	 * at KVM_SET_ONE_REG.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(feature_frac_table); i++) {
+		frac = &feature_frac_table[i];
+		err = vcpu_id_reg_feature_frac_check(vcpu, frac);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static void id_reg_info_init_all(void)
 {
 	int i;
 	struct id_reg_info *id_reg;
+	struct feature_frac *frac;
+	u64 ftr_mask = ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_MASK;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(id_reg_info_table); i++) {
 		id_reg = (struct id_reg_info *)id_reg_info_table[i];
@@ -3446,6 +3542,20 @@ static void id_reg_info_init_all(void)
 
 		id_reg_info_init(id_reg);
 	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Update ignore_mask of ID registers based on fractional fields
+	 * information.  Any ID register that have fractional fields
+	 * is expected to have its own id_reg_info.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(feature_frac_table); i++) {
+		frac = &feature_frac_table[i];
+		id_reg = GET_ID_REG_INFO(frac->frac_id);
+		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!id_reg))
+			continue;
+
+		id_reg->ignore_mask |= ftr_mask << frac->frac_shift;
+	}
 }
 
 void kvm_sys_reg_table_init(void)
-- 
2.34.1.448.ga2b2bfdf31-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-01-06  4:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 201+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-06  4:26 [RFC PATCH v4 00/26] KVM: arm64: Make CPU ID registers writable by userspace Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 01/26] KVM: arm64: Introduce a validation function for an ID register Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-07  7:12   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-07  7:12     ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-07  7:12     ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-24 16:20   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-24 16:20     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-24 16:20     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-26  6:04     ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-26  6:04       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-26  6:04       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-01 14:13       ` Fuad Tabba
2022-02-01 14:13         ` Fuad Tabba
2022-02-01 14:13         ` Fuad Tabba
2022-02-02  6:46         ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-02  6:46           ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-02  6:46           ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-26  4:30   ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-26  4:30     ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-26  4:30     ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-28  6:01     ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-28  6:01       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-28  6:01       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 02/26] KVM: arm64: Save ID registers' sanitized value per guest Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-24 16:21   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-24 16:21     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-24 16:21     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-02-09  2:26     ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-09  2:26       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-09  2:26       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-26  5:22   ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-26  5:22     ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-26  5:22     ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-28  6:24     ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-28  6:24       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-28  6:24       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-28 19:27       ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-28 19:27         ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-28 19:27         ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-29  5:52         ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-29  5:52           ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-29  5:52           ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-31  3:40           ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-31  3:40             ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-31  3:40             ` Ricardo Koller
2022-02-01  6:00             ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-01  6:00               ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-01  6:00               ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-01 18:38               ` Ricardo Koller
2022-02-01 18:38                 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-02-01 18:38                 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-02-03  6:31                 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-03  6:31                   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-03  6:31                   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-04 14:41                   ` Ricardo Koller
2022-02-04 14:41                     ` Ricardo Koller
2022-02-04 14:41                     ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-06  4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 03/26] KVM: arm64: Introduce struct id_reg_info Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-24 16:28   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-24 16:28     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-24 16:28     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-26  6:46     ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-26  6:46       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-26  6:46       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-01 14:13       ` Fuad Tabba
2022-02-01 14:13         ` Fuad Tabba
2022-02-01 14:13         ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-06  4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 04/26] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64PFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-24 16:51   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-24 16:51     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-24 16:51     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-27  4:01     ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-27  4:01       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-27  4:01       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-01 14:14       ` Fuad Tabba
2022-02-01 14:14         ` Fuad Tabba
2022-02-01 14:14         ` Fuad Tabba
2022-02-10  5:33         ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-10  5:33           ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-10  5:33           ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 05/26] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 06/26] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 07/26] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 08/26] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 09/26] KVM: arm64: Hide IMPLEMENTATION DEFINED PMU support for the guest Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 10/26] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 11/26] KVM: arm64: Make ID_DFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 12/26] KVM: arm64: Make MVFR1_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 13/26] KVM: arm64: Make ID registers without id_reg_info writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26 ` Reiji Watanabe [this message]
2022-01-06  4:26   ` [RFC PATCH v4 14/26] KVM: arm64: Add consistency checking for frac fields of ID registers Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-24 17:00   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-24 17:00     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-24 17:00     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-27  5:03     ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-27  5:03       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-27  5:03       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 15/26] KVM: arm64: Introduce KVM_CAP_ARM_ID_REG_CONFIGURABLE capability Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 16/26] KVM: arm64: Add kunit test for ID register validation Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 17/26] KVM: arm64: Use vcpu->arch cptr_el2 to track value of cptr_el2 for VHE Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 18/26] KVM: arm64: Use vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2 to track value of mdcr_el2 Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 19/26] KVM: arm64: Introduce framework to trap disabled features Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 20/26] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64PFR0_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-24 17:16     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-24 17:16     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-27  7:19     ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-27  7:19       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-27  7:19       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-01 14:14       ` Fuad Tabba
2022-02-01 14:14         ` Fuad Tabba
2022-02-01 14:14         ` Fuad Tabba
2022-02-10  4:15         ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-10  4:15           ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-10  4:15           ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 21/26] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 22/26] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-24 17:19   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-24 17:19     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-24 17:19     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-28  5:40     ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-28  5:40       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-28  5:40       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 23/26] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-24 17:37   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-24 17:37     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-24 17:37     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-28  5:43     ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-28  5:43       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-28  5:43       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-09  4:51       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-09  4:51         ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-09  4:51         ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 24/26] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 25/26] KVM: arm64: Add kunit test for trap initialization Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 26/26] KVM: arm64: selftests: Introduce id_reg_test Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-18  4:24 ` [RFC PATCH v4 00/26] KVM: arm64: Make CPU ID registers writable by userspace Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-18  4:24   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-18  4:24   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-24 16:18 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-24 16:18   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-24 16:18   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-25  6:31   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-25  6:31     ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-25  6:31     ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-01 14:12     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-02-01 14:12       ` Fuad Tabba
2022-02-01 14:12       ` Fuad Tabba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220106042708.2869332-15-reijiw@google.com \
    --to=reijiw@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pshier@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.