All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 20/26] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64PFR0_EL1
Date: Wed,  5 Jan 2022 20:27:02 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220106042708.2869332-21-reijiw@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220106042708.2869332-1-reijiw@google.com>

Add feature_config_ctrl for RAS and AMU, which are indicated in
ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, to program configuration registers to trap
guest's using those features when they are not exposed to the guest.

Introduce trap_ras_regs() to change a behavior of guest's access to
the registers, which is currently raz/wi, depending on the feature's
availability for the guest (and inject undefined instruction
exception when guest's RAS register access are trapped and RAS is
not exposed to the guest).  In order to keep the current visibility
of the RAS registers from userspace (always visible), a visibility
function for RAS registers is not added.

No code is added for AMU's access/visibility handler because the
current code already injects the exception for Guest's AMU register
access unconditionally because AMU is never exposed to the guest.

Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 33893a501475..015d67092d5e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -304,6 +304,63 @@ struct feature_config_ctrl {
 	void	(*trap_activate)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 };
 
+enum vcpu_config_reg {
+	VCPU_HCR_EL2 = 1,
+	VCPU_MDCR_EL2,
+	VCPU_CPTR_EL2,
+};
+
+static void feature_trap_activate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+				  enum vcpu_config_reg cfg_reg,
+				  u64 cfg_set, u64 cfg_clear)
+{
+	u64 *reg_ptr, reg_val;
+
+	switch (cfg_reg) {
+	case VCPU_HCR_EL2:
+		reg_ptr = &vcpu->arch.hcr_el2;
+		break;
+	case VCPU_MDCR_EL2:
+		reg_ptr = &vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2;
+		break;
+	case VCPU_CPTR_EL2:
+		reg_ptr = &vcpu->arch.cptr_el2;
+		break;
+	}
+
+	/* Clear/Set fields that are indicated by cfg_clear/cfg_set. */
+	reg_val = (*reg_ptr & ~cfg_clear);
+	reg_val |= cfg_set;
+	*reg_ptr = reg_val;
+}
+
+static void feature_ras_trap_activate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	feature_trap_activate(vcpu, VCPU_HCR_EL2, HCR_TERR | HCR_TEA, HCR_FIEN);
+}
+
+static void feature_amu_trap_activate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	feature_trap_activate(vcpu, VCPU_CPTR_EL2, CPTR_EL2_TAM, 0);
+}
+
+/* For ID_AA64PFR0_EL1 */
+static struct feature_config_ctrl ftr_ctrl_ras = {
+	.ftr_reg = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
+	.ftr_shift = ID_AA64PFR0_RAS_SHIFT,
+	.ftr_min = ID_AA64PFR0_RAS_V1,
+	.ftr_signed = FTR_UNSIGNED,
+	.trap_activate = feature_ras_trap_activate,
+};
+
+static struct feature_config_ctrl ftr_ctrl_amu = {
+	.ftr_reg = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
+	.ftr_shift = ID_AA64PFR0_AMU_SHIFT,
+	.ftr_min = ID_AA64PFR0_AMU,
+	.ftr_signed = FTR_UNSIGNED,
+	.trap_activate = feature_amu_trap_activate,
+};
+
 struct id_reg_info {
 	u32	sys_reg;	/* Register ID */
 	u64	sys_val;	/* Sanitized system value */
@@ -778,6 +835,11 @@ static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr0_el1_info = {
 	.init = init_id_aa64pfr0_el1_info,
 	.validate = validate_id_aa64pfr0_el1,
 	.vcpu_mask = vcpu_mask_id_aa64pfr0_el1,
+	.trap_features = &(const struct feature_config_ctrl *[]) {
+		&ftr_ctrl_ras,
+		&ftr_ctrl_amu,
+		NULL,
+	},
 };
 
 static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr1_el1_info = {
@@ -901,6 +963,18 @@ static inline bool vcpu_feature_is_available(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return feature_avail(ctrl, val);
 }
 
+static bool trap_ras_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			  struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			  const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
+{
+	if (!vcpu_feature_is_available(vcpu, &ftr_ctrl_ras)) {
+		kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	return trap_raz_wi(vcpu, p, r);
+}
+
 /*
  * ARMv8.1 mandates at least a trivial LORegion implementation, where all the
  * RW registers are RES0 (which we can implement as RAZ/WI). On an ARMv8.0
@@ -2265,14 +2339,14 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_AFSR1_EL1), access_vm_reg, reset_unknown, AFSR1_EL1 },
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ESR_EL1), access_vm_reg, reset_unknown, ESR_EL1 },
 
-	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERRIDR_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
-	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERRSELR_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
-	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXFR_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
-	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXCTLR_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
-	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXSTATUS_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
-	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXADDR_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
-	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXMISC0_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
-	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXMISC1_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERRIDR_EL1), trap_ras_regs },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERRSELR_EL1), trap_ras_regs },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXFR_EL1), trap_ras_regs },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXCTLR_EL1), trap_ras_regs },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXSTATUS_EL1), trap_ras_regs },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXADDR_EL1), trap_ras_regs },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXMISC0_EL1), trap_ras_regs },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXMISC1_EL1), trap_ras_regs },
 
 	MTE_REG(TFSR_EL1),
 	MTE_REG(TFSRE0_EL1),
-- 
2.34.1.448.ga2b2bfdf31-goog

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	 James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	 Peng Liang <liangpeng10@huawei.com>,
	Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
	 Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>,
	 Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
	Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@google.com>,
	Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 20/26] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64PFR0_EL1
Date: Wed,  5 Jan 2022 20:27:02 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220106042708.2869332-21-reijiw@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220106042708.2869332-1-reijiw@google.com>

Add feature_config_ctrl for RAS and AMU, which are indicated in
ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, to program configuration registers to trap
guest's using those features when they are not exposed to the guest.

Introduce trap_ras_regs() to change a behavior of guest's access to
the registers, which is currently raz/wi, depending on the feature's
availability for the guest (and inject undefined instruction
exception when guest's RAS register access are trapped and RAS is
not exposed to the guest).  In order to keep the current visibility
of the RAS registers from userspace (always visible), a visibility
function for RAS registers is not added.

No code is added for AMU's access/visibility handler because the
current code already injects the exception for Guest's AMU register
access unconditionally because AMU is never exposed to the guest.

Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 33893a501475..015d67092d5e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -304,6 +304,63 @@ struct feature_config_ctrl {
 	void	(*trap_activate)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 };
 
+enum vcpu_config_reg {
+	VCPU_HCR_EL2 = 1,
+	VCPU_MDCR_EL2,
+	VCPU_CPTR_EL2,
+};
+
+static void feature_trap_activate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+				  enum vcpu_config_reg cfg_reg,
+				  u64 cfg_set, u64 cfg_clear)
+{
+	u64 *reg_ptr, reg_val;
+
+	switch (cfg_reg) {
+	case VCPU_HCR_EL2:
+		reg_ptr = &vcpu->arch.hcr_el2;
+		break;
+	case VCPU_MDCR_EL2:
+		reg_ptr = &vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2;
+		break;
+	case VCPU_CPTR_EL2:
+		reg_ptr = &vcpu->arch.cptr_el2;
+		break;
+	}
+
+	/* Clear/Set fields that are indicated by cfg_clear/cfg_set. */
+	reg_val = (*reg_ptr & ~cfg_clear);
+	reg_val |= cfg_set;
+	*reg_ptr = reg_val;
+}
+
+static void feature_ras_trap_activate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	feature_trap_activate(vcpu, VCPU_HCR_EL2, HCR_TERR | HCR_TEA, HCR_FIEN);
+}
+
+static void feature_amu_trap_activate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	feature_trap_activate(vcpu, VCPU_CPTR_EL2, CPTR_EL2_TAM, 0);
+}
+
+/* For ID_AA64PFR0_EL1 */
+static struct feature_config_ctrl ftr_ctrl_ras = {
+	.ftr_reg = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
+	.ftr_shift = ID_AA64PFR0_RAS_SHIFT,
+	.ftr_min = ID_AA64PFR0_RAS_V1,
+	.ftr_signed = FTR_UNSIGNED,
+	.trap_activate = feature_ras_trap_activate,
+};
+
+static struct feature_config_ctrl ftr_ctrl_amu = {
+	.ftr_reg = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
+	.ftr_shift = ID_AA64PFR0_AMU_SHIFT,
+	.ftr_min = ID_AA64PFR0_AMU,
+	.ftr_signed = FTR_UNSIGNED,
+	.trap_activate = feature_amu_trap_activate,
+};
+
 struct id_reg_info {
 	u32	sys_reg;	/* Register ID */
 	u64	sys_val;	/* Sanitized system value */
@@ -778,6 +835,11 @@ static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr0_el1_info = {
 	.init = init_id_aa64pfr0_el1_info,
 	.validate = validate_id_aa64pfr0_el1,
 	.vcpu_mask = vcpu_mask_id_aa64pfr0_el1,
+	.trap_features = &(const struct feature_config_ctrl *[]) {
+		&ftr_ctrl_ras,
+		&ftr_ctrl_amu,
+		NULL,
+	},
 };
 
 static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr1_el1_info = {
@@ -901,6 +963,18 @@ static inline bool vcpu_feature_is_available(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return feature_avail(ctrl, val);
 }
 
+static bool trap_ras_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			  struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			  const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
+{
+	if (!vcpu_feature_is_available(vcpu, &ftr_ctrl_ras)) {
+		kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	return trap_raz_wi(vcpu, p, r);
+}
+
 /*
  * ARMv8.1 mandates at least a trivial LORegion implementation, where all the
  * RW registers are RES0 (which we can implement as RAZ/WI). On an ARMv8.0
@@ -2265,14 +2339,14 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_AFSR1_EL1), access_vm_reg, reset_unknown, AFSR1_EL1 },
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ESR_EL1), access_vm_reg, reset_unknown, ESR_EL1 },
 
-	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERRIDR_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
-	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERRSELR_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
-	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXFR_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
-	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXCTLR_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
-	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXSTATUS_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
-	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXADDR_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
-	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXMISC0_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
-	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXMISC1_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERRIDR_EL1), trap_ras_regs },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERRSELR_EL1), trap_ras_regs },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXFR_EL1), trap_ras_regs },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXCTLR_EL1), trap_ras_regs },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXSTATUS_EL1), trap_ras_regs },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXADDR_EL1), trap_ras_regs },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXMISC0_EL1), trap_ras_regs },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXMISC1_EL1), trap_ras_regs },
 
 	MTE_REG(TFSR_EL1),
 	MTE_REG(TFSRE0_EL1),
-- 
2.34.1.448.ga2b2bfdf31-goog


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	Peng Liang <liangpeng10@huawei.com>,
	Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
	Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>,
	Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
	Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@google.com>,
	Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 20/26] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64PFR0_EL1
Date: Wed,  5 Jan 2022 20:27:02 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220106042708.2869332-21-reijiw@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220106042708.2869332-1-reijiw@google.com>

Add feature_config_ctrl for RAS and AMU, which are indicated in
ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, to program configuration registers to trap
guest's using those features when they are not exposed to the guest.

Introduce trap_ras_regs() to change a behavior of guest's access to
the registers, which is currently raz/wi, depending on the feature's
availability for the guest (and inject undefined instruction
exception when guest's RAS register access are trapped and RAS is
not exposed to the guest).  In order to keep the current visibility
of the RAS registers from userspace (always visible), a visibility
function for RAS registers is not added.

No code is added for AMU's access/visibility handler because the
current code already injects the exception for Guest's AMU register
access unconditionally because AMU is never exposed to the guest.

Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 33893a501475..015d67092d5e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -304,6 +304,63 @@ struct feature_config_ctrl {
 	void	(*trap_activate)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 };
 
+enum vcpu_config_reg {
+	VCPU_HCR_EL2 = 1,
+	VCPU_MDCR_EL2,
+	VCPU_CPTR_EL2,
+};
+
+static void feature_trap_activate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+				  enum vcpu_config_reg cfg_reg,
+				  u64 cfg_set, u64 cfg_clear)
+{
+	u64 *reg_ptr, reg_val;
+
+	switch (cfg_reg) {
+	case VCPU_HCR_EL2:
+		reg_ptr = &vcpu->arch.hcr_el2;
+		break;
+	case VCPU_MDCR_EL2:
+		reg_ptr = &vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2;
+		break;
+	case VCPU_CPTR_EL2:
+		reg_ptr = &vcpu->arch.cptr_el2;
+		break;
+	}
+
+	/* Clear/Set fields that are indicated by cfg_clear/cfg_set. */
+	reg_val = (*reg_ptr & ~cfg_clear);
+	reg_val |= cfg_set;
+	*reg_ptr = reg_val;
+}
+
+static void feature_ras_trap_activate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	feature_trap_activate(vcpu, VCPU_HCR_EL2, HCR_TERR | HCR_TEA, HCR_FIEN);
+}
+
+static void feature_amu_trap_activate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	feature_trap_activate(vcpu, VCPU_CPTR_EL2, CPTR_EL2_TAM, 0);
+}
+
+/* For ID_AA64PFR0_EL1 */
+static struct feature_config_ctrl ftr_ctrl_ras = {
+	.ftr_reg = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
+	.ftr_shift = ID_AA64PFR0_RAS_SHIFT,
+	.ftr_min = ID_AA64PFR0_RAS_V1,
+	.ftr_signed = FTR_UNSIGNED,
+	.trap_activate = feature_ras_trap_activate,
+};
+
+static struct feature_config_ctrl ftr_ctrl_amu = {
+	.ftr_reg = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
+	.ftr_shift = ID_AA64PFR0_AMU_SHIFT,
+	.ftr_min = ID_AA64PFR0_AMU,
+	.ftr_signed = FTR_UNSIGNED,
+	.trap_activate = feature_amu_trap_activate,
+};
+
 struct id_reg_info {
 	u32	sys_reg;	/* Register ID */
 	u64	sys_val;	/* Sanitized system value */
@@ -778,6 +835,11 @@ static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr0_el1_info = {
 	.init = init_id_aa64pfr0_el1_info,
 	.validate = validate_id_aa64pfr0_el1,
 	.vcpu_mask = vcpu_mask_id_aa64pfr0_el1,
+	.trap_features = &(const struct feature_config_ctrl *[]) {
+		&ftr_ctrl_ras,
+		&ftr_ctrl_amu,
+		NULL,
+	},
 };
 
 static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr1_el1_info = {
@@ -901,6 +963,18 @@ static inline bool vcpu_feature_is_available(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return feature_avail(ctrl, val);
 }
 
+static bool trap_ras_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			  struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			  const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
+{
+	if (!vcpu_feature_is_available(vcpu, &ftr_ctrl_ras)) {
+		kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	return trap_raz_wi(vcpu, p, r);
+}
+
 /*
  * ARMv8.1 mandates at least a trivial LORegion implementation, where all the
  * RW registers are RES0 (which we can implement as RAZ/WI). On an ARMv8.0
@@ -2265,14 +2339,14 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_AFSR1_EL1), access_vm_reg, reset_unknown, AFSR1_EL1 },
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ESR_EL1), access_vm_reg, reset_unknown, ESR_EL1 },
 
-	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERRIDR_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
-	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERRSELR_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
-	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXFR_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
-	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXCTLR_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
-	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXSTATUS_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
-	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXADDR_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
-	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXMISC0_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
-	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXMISC1_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERRIDR_EL1), trap_ras_regs },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERRSELR_EL1), trap_ras_regs },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXFR_EL1), trap_ras_regs },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXCTLR_EL1), trap_ras_regs },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXSTATUS_EL1), trap_ras_regs },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXADDR_EL1), trap_ras_regs },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXMISC0_EL1), trap_ras_regs },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXMISC1_EL1), trap_ras_regs },
 
 	MTE_REG(TFSR_EL1),
 	MTE_REG(TFSRE0_EL1),
-- 
2.34.1.448.ga2b2bfdf31-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-01-06  4:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 201+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-06  4:26 [RFC PATCH v4 00/26] KVM: arm64: Make CPU ID registers writable by userspace Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 01/26] KVM: arm64: Introduce a validation function for an ID register Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-07  7:12   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-07  7:12     ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-07  7:12     ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-24 16:20   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-24 16:20     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-24 16:20     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-26  6:04     ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-26  6:04       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-26  6:04       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-01 14:13       ` Fuad Tabba
2022-02-01 14:13         ` Fuad Tabba
2022-02-01 14:13         ` Fuad Tabba
2022-02-02  6:46         ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-02  6:46           ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-02  6:46           ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-26  4:30   ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-26  4:30     ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-26  4:30     ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-28  6:01     ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-28  6:01       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-28  6:01       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 02/26] KVM: arm64: Save ID registers' sanitized value per guest Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-24 16:21   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-24 16:21     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-24 16:21     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-02-09  2:26     ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-09  2:26       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-09  2:26       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-26  5:22   ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-26  5:22     ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-26  5:22     ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-28  6:24     ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-28  6:24       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-28  6:24       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-28 19:27       ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-28 19:27         ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-28 19:27         ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-29  5:52         ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-29  5:52           ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-29  5:52           ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-31  3:40           ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-31  3:40             ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-31  3:40             ` Ricardo Koller
2022-02-01  6:00             ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-01  6:00               ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-01  6:00               ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-01 18:38               ` Ricardo Koller
2022-02-01 18:38                 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-02-01 18:38                 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-02-03  6:31                 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-03  6:31                   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-03  6:31                   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-04 14:41                   ` Ricardo Koller
2022-02-04 14:41                     ` Ricardo Koller
2022-02-04 14:41                     ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-06  4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 03/26] KVM: arm64: Introduce struct id_reg_info Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-24 16:28   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-24 16:28     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-24 16:28     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-26  6:46     ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-26  6:46       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-26  6:46       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-01 14:13       ` Fuad Tabba
2022-02-01 14:13         ` Fuad Tabba
2022-02-01 14:13         ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-06  4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 04/26] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64PFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-24 16:51   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-24 16:51     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-24 16:51     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-27  4:01     ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-27  4:01       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-27  4:01       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-01 14:14       ` Fuad Tabba
2022-02-01 14:14         ` Fuad Tabba
2022-02-01 14:14         ` Fuad Tabba
2022-02-10  5:33         ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-10  5:33           ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-10  5:33           ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 05/26] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 06/26] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 07/26] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 08/26] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 09/26] KVM: arm64: Hide IMPLEMENTATION DEFINED PMU support for the guest Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 10/26] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 11/26] KVM: arm64: Make ID_DFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 12/26] KVM: arm64: Make MVFR1_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 13/26] KVM: arm64: Make ID registers without id_reg_info writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 14/26] KVM: arm64: Add consistency checking for frac fields of ID registers Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-24 17:00   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-24 17:00     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-24 17:00     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-27  5:03     ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-27  5:03       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-27  5:03       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 15/26] KVM: arm64: Introduce KVM_CAP_ARM_ID_REG_CONFIGURABLE capability Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 16/26] KVM: arm64: Add kunit test for ID register validation Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 17/26] KVM: arm64: Use vcpu->arch cptr_el2 to track value of cptr_el2 for VHE Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 18/26] KVM: arm64: Use vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2 to track value of mdcr_el2 Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 19/26] KVM: arm64: Introduce framework to trap disabled features Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27 ` Reiji Watanabe [this message]
2022-01-06  4:27   ` [RFC PATCH v4 20/26] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64PFR0_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-24 17:16     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-24 17:16     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-27  7:19     ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-27  7:19       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-27  7:19       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-01 14:14       ` Fuad Tabba
2022-02-01 14:14         ` Fuad Tabba
2022-02-01 14:14         ` Fuad Tabba
2022-02-10  4:15         ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-10  4:15           ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-10  4:15           ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 21/26] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 22/26] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-24 17:19   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-24 17:19     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-24 17:19     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-28  5:40     ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-28  5:40       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-28  5:40       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 23/26] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-24 17:37   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-24 17:37     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-24 17:37     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-28  5:43     ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-28  5:43       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-28  5:43       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-09  4:51       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-09  4:51         ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-09  4:51         ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 24/26] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 25/26] KVM: arm64: Add kunit test for trap initialization Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 26/26] KVM: arm64: selftests: Introduce id_reg_test Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06  4:27   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-18  4:24 ` [RFC PATCH v4 00/26] KVM: arm64: Make CPU ID registers writable by userspace Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-18  4:24   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-18  4:24   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-24 16:18 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-24 16:18   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-24 16:18   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-25  6:31   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-25  6:31     ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-25  6:31     ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-01 14:12     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-02-01 14:12       ` Fuad Tabba
2022-02-01 14:12       ` Fuad Tabba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220106042708.2869332-21-reijiw@google.com \
    --to=reijiw@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pshier@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.