All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>,
	Intel GFX <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	DRI Devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	kbuild-all@lists.01.org, Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 6/7] drm/i915/gt: Create per-tile RPS sysfs interfaces
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 03:47:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202202180224.l042viYj-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220217144158.21555-7-andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>

Hi Andi,

I love your patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on drm-tip/drm-tip]
[cannot apply to drm-intel/for-linux-next drm-exynos/exynos-drm-next drm/drm-next tegra-drm/drm/tegra/for-next airlied/drm-next v5.17-rc4 next-20220217]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Andi-Shyti/Introduce-multitile-support/20220217-224547
base:   git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-tip drm-tip
config: x86_64-randconfig-a011 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220218/202202180224.l042viYj-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-22) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/f1802e7224006bf4801fe56193bf5eb223a3f4d0
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Andi-Shyti/Introduce-multitile-support/20220217-224547
        git checkout f1802e7224006bf4801fe56193bf5eb223a3f4d0
        # save the config file to linux build tree
        mkdir build_dir
        make W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c: In function 'act_freq_mhz_show':
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c:250:20: error: implicit declaration of function 'sysfs_gt_attribute_r_func' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     250 |  s64 actual_freq = sysfs_gt_attribute_r_func(dev, attr,
         |                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c: In function 'boost_freq_mhz_store':
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c:318:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'sysfs_gt_attribute_w_func' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     318 |  return sysfs_gt_attribute_w_func(dev, attr,
         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors


vim +/sysfs_gt_attribute_r_func +250 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c

   246	
   247	static ssize_t act_freq_mhz_show(struct device *dev,
   248					 struct device_attribute *attr, char *buff)
   249	{
 > 250		s64 actual_freq = sysfs_gt_attribute_r_func(dev, attr,
   251							    __act_freq_mhz_show);
   252	
   253		return sysfs_emit(buff, "%u\n", (u32) actual_freq);
   254	}
   255	
   256	static s64 __cur_freq_mhz_show(struct intel_gt *gt)
   257	{
   258		return intel_rps_get_requested_frequency(&gt->rps);
   259	}
   260	
   261	static ssize_t cur_freq_mhz_show(struct device *dev,
   262					 struct device_attribute *attr, char *buff)
   263	{
   264		s64 cur_freq = sysfs_gt_attribute_r_func(dev, attr,
   265							 __cur_freq_mhz_show);
   266	
   267		return sysfs_emit(buff, "%u\n", (u32) cur_freq);
   268	}
   269	
   270	static s64 __boost_freq_mhz_show(struct intel_gt *gt)
   271	{
   272		return intel_rps_get_boost_frequency(&gt->rps);
   273	}
   274	
   275	static ssize_t boost_freq_mhz_show(struct device *dev,
   276					   struct device_attribute *attr,
   277					   char *buff)
   278	{
   279		s64 boost_freq = sysfs_gt_attribute_r_func(dev, attr,
   280							   __boost_freq_mhz_show);
   281	
   282		return sysfs_emit(buff, "%u\n", (u32) boost_freq);
   283	}
   284	
   285	static int __boost_freq_mhz_store(struct intel_gt *gt, u32 val)
   286	{
   287		struct intel_rps *rps = &gt->rps;
   288		bool boost = false;
   289	
   290		/* Validate against (static) hardware limits */
   291		val = intel_freq_opcode(rps, val);
   292		if (val < rps->min_freq || val > rps->max_freq)
   293			return -EINVAL;
   294	
   295		mutex_lock(&rps->lock);
   296		if (val != rps->boost_freq) {
   297			rps->boost_freq = val;
   298			boost = atomic_read(&rps->num_waiters);
   299		}
   300		mutex_unlock(&rps->lock);
   301		if (boost)
   302			schedule_work(&rps->work);
   303	
   304		return 0;
   305	}
   306	
   307	static ssize_t boost_freq_mhz_store(struct device *dev,
   308					    struct device_attribute *attr,
   309					    const char *buff, size_t count)
   310	{
   311		ssize_t ret;
   312		u32 val;
   313	
   314		ret = kstrtou32(buff, 0, &val);
   315		if (ret)
   316			return ret;
   317	
 > 318		return sysfs_gt_attribute_w_func(dev, attr,
   319						 __boost_freq_mhz_store, val) ?: count;
   320	}
   321	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 6/7] drm/i915/gt: Create per-tile RPS sysfs interfaces
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 03:47:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202202180224.l042viYj-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220217144158.21555-7-andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4774 bytes --]

Hi Andi,

I love your patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on drm-tip/drm-tip]
[cannot apply to drm-intel/for-linux-next drm-exynos/exynos-drm-next drm/drm-next tegra-drm/drm/tegra/for-next airlied/drm-next v5.17-rc4 next-20220217]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Andi-Shyti/Introduce-multitile-support/20220217-224547
base:   git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-tip drm-tip
config: x86_64-randconfig-a011 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220218/202202180224.l042viYj-lkp(a)intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-22) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/f1802e7224006bf4801fe56193bf5eb223a3f4d0
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Andi-Shyti/Introduce-multitile-support/20220217-224547
        git checkout f1802e7224006bf4801fe56193bf5eb223a3f4d0
        # save the config file to linux build tree
        mkdir build_dir
        make W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c: In function 'act_freq_mhz_show':
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c:250:20: error: implicit declaration of function 'sysfs_gt_attribute_r_func' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     250 |  s64 actual_freq = sysfs_gt_attribute_r_func(dev, attr,
         |                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c: In function 'boost_freq_mhz_store':
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c:318:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'sysfs_gt_attribute_w_func' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     318 |  return sysfs_gt_attribute_w_func(dev, attr,
         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors


vim +/sysfs_gt_attribute_r_func +250 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c

   246	
   247	static ssize_t act_freq_mhz_show(struct device *dev,
   248					 struct device_attribute *attr, char *buff)
   249	{
 > 250		s64 actual_freq = sysfs_gt_attribute_r_func(dev, attr,
   251							    __act_freq_mhz_show);
   252	
   253		return sysfs_emit(buff, "%u\n", (u32) actual_freq);
   254	}
   255	
   256	static s64 __cur_freq_mhz_show(struct intel_gt *gt)
   257	{
   258		return intel_rps_get_requested_frequency(&gt->rps);
   259	}
   260	
   261	static ssize_t cur_freq_mhz_show(struct device *dev,
   262					 struct device_attribute *attr, char *buff)
   263	{
   264		s64 cur_freq = sysfs_gt_attribute_r_func(dev, attr,
   265							 __cur_freq_mhz_show);
   266	
   267		return sysfs_emit(buff, "%u\n", (u32) cur_freq);
   268	}
   269	
   270	static s64 __boost_freq_mhz_show(struct intel_gt *gt)
   271	{
   272		return intel_rps_get_boost_frequency(&gt->rps);
   273	}
   274	
   275	static ssize_t boost_freq_mhz_show(struct device *dev,
   276					   struct device_attribute *attr,
   277					   char *buff)
   278	{
   279		s64 boost_freq = sysfs_gt_attribute_r_func(dev, attr,
   280							   __boost_freq_mhz_show);
   281	
   282		return sysfs_emit(buff, "%u\n", (u32) boost_freq);
   283	}
   284	
   285	static int __boost_freq_mhz_store(struct intel_gt *gt, u32 val)
   286	{
   287		struct intel_rps *rps = &gt->rps;
   288		bool boost = false;
   289	
   290		/* Validate against (static) hardware limits */
   291		val = intel_freq_opcode(rps, val);
   292		if (val < rps->min_freq || val > rps->max_freq)
   293			return -EINVAL;
   294	
   295		mutex_lock(&rps->lock);
   296		if (val != rps->boost_freq) {
   297			rps->boost_freq = val;
   298			boost = atomic_read(&rps->num_waiters);
   299		}
   300		mutex_unlock(&rps->lock);
   301		if (boost)
   302			schedule_work(&rps->work);
   303	
   304		return 0;
   305	}
   306	
   307	static ssize_t boost_freq_mhz_store(struct device *dev,
   308					    struct device_attribute *attr,
   309					    const char *buff, size_t count)
   310	{
   311		ssize_t ret;
   312		u32 val;
   313	
   314		ret = kstrtou32(buff, 0, &val);
   315		if (ret)
   316			return ret;
   317	
 > 318		return sysfs_gt_attribute_w_func(dev, attr,
   319						 __boost_freq_mhz_store, val) ?: count;
   320	}
   321	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-17 19:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-17 14:41 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 0/7] Introduce multitile support Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 14:41 ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 14:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 1/7] drm/i915: Rename INTEL_REGION_LMEM with INTEL_REGION_LMEM_0 Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 14:41   ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-28 19:53   ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2022-02-28 19:53     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2022-03-01 15:19   ` [Intel-gfx] " Andrzej Hajda
2022-03-01 15:19     ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-02-17 14:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 2/7] drm/i915: Prepare for multiple GTs Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 14:41   ` Andi Shyti
2022-03-01 15:15   ` [Intel-gfx] " Andrzej Hajda
2022-03-01 15:15     ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-03-06 19:20     ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2022-03-06 19:20       ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 14:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 3/7] drm/i915/gt: add gt_is_root() helper Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 14:41   ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-28 20:02   ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2022-03-01 15:25     ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-03-06 19:23       ` Andi Shyti
2022-03-06 19:23         ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 14:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 4/7] drm/i915/gt: create per-tile sysfs interface Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 14:41   ` Andi Shyti
2022-03-02 16:57   ` [Intel-gfx] " Andrzej Hajda
2022-03-02 16:57     ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-03-06 23:04     ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2022-03-06 23:04       ` Andi Shyti
2022-03-07 20:25       ` [Intel-gfx] " Andrzej Hajda
2022-03-07 20:25         ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-03-13 19:45         ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2022-03-13 19:45           ` Andi Shyti
2022-03-13 21:30           ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2022-03-13 21:30             ` Andi Shyti
2022-03-14 12:08           ` [Intel-gfx] " Andrzej Hajda
2022-03-14 12:08             ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-02-17 14:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 5/7] drm/i915/gt: Create per-tile RC6 " Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 14:41   ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 15:34   ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-02-17 15:53     ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 15:53       ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-18  9:12       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-02-18  9:21         ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-18  9:21           ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-18 10:46       ` Joonas Lahtinen
2022-02-21 17:12         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-02-22  8:57           ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-22  8:57             ` Andi Shyti
2022-11-07  0:08             ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-11-07  0:08               ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-02-17 20:49   ` kernel test robot
2022-02-17 20:49     ` kernel test robot
2022-02-17 23:53   ` kernel test robot
2022-02-17 23:53     ` kernel test robot
2022-02-17 23:53     ` kernel test robot
2022-03-03 10:19   ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-03-03 10:19     ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-03-13 22:15     ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2022-03-13 22:15       ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 14:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 6/7] drm/i915/gt: Create per-tile RPS sysfs interfaces Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 14:41   ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 19:47   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2022-02-17 19:47     ` [Intel-gfx] " kernel test robot
2022-03-03 10:55   ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-03-03 10:55     ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-03-13 23:09     ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2022-03-13 23:09       ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 14:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 7/7] drm/i915/gt: Adding new sysfs frequency attributes Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 14:41   ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 15:45   ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 15:45     ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 17:06     ` [Intel-gfx] " Sundaresan, Sujaritha
2022-02-17 17:06       ` Sundaresan, Sujaritha
2022-02-28 20:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2022-02-28 20:37     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2022-03-14  0:38     ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2022-03-14  0:38       ` Andi Shyti
2022-03-14  1:32       ` [Intel-gfx] " Sundaresan, Sujaritha
2022-03-14  1:32         ` Sundaresan, Sujaritha
2022-03-03 11:17   ` [Intel-gfx] " Andrzej Hajda
2022-03-03 11:17     ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-02-17 23:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Introduce multitile support Patchwork
2022-02-17 23:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-02-17 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2022-02-17 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: warning " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202202180224.l042viYj-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=andi.shyti@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.