All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Intel GFX <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	DRI Devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 7/7] drm/i915/gt: Adding new sysfs frequency attributes
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 16:45:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yg5tgepi3dkP6Y0M@intel.intel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220217144158.21555-8-andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>

Hi,

I forgot to add some note to this patch...

[...]

> +static ssize_t throttle_reason_status_show(struct device *dev,
> +					   struct device_attribute *attr,
> +					   char *buff)
> +{
> +	struct intel_gt *gt = intel_gt_sysfs_get_drvdata(dev, attr->attr.name);
> +	struct intel_rps *rps = &gt->rps;
> +	bool status = !!intel_rps_read_throttle_reason_status(rps);

why are these boolean? Can't we send whatever we read from the
register?

[...]

> +#define GT0_PERF_LIMIT_REASONS		_MMIO(0x1381A8)
> +#define   GT0_PERF_LIMIT_REASONS_MASK	0x00000de3

This mask is really weird! Sujaritha, can you please explain it?

It looks something like this,

  REG_GENMASK(11, 6) | REG_GENMASK(2, 0)

But I don't know if it improves any readability, in any case, the
mask is not clear.

> +#define   PROCHOT_MASK			BIT(1)
> +#define   THERMAL_LIMIT_MASK		BIT(2)
> +#define   RATL_MASK			BIT(6)
> +#define   VR_THERMALERT_MASK		BIT(7)
> +#define   VR_TDC_MASK			BIT(8)
> +#define   POWER_LIMIT_4_MASK		BIT(9)
> +#define   POWER_LIMIT_1_MASK		BIT(11)
> +#define   POWER_LIMIT_2_MASK		BIT(12)

I hope I got these right. Sujaritha, can you please check?

Andi

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@gmail.com>,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>,
	Intel GFX <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	DRI Devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>,
	Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
	Andi Shyti <andi@etezian.org>,
	Sujaritha Sundaresan <sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/7] drm/i915/gt: Adding new sysfs frequency attributes
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 16:45:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yg5tgepi3dkP6Y0M@intel.intel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220217144158.21555-8-andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>

Hi,

I forgot to add some note to this patch...

[...]

> +static ssize_t throttle_reason_status_show(struct device *dev,
> +					   struct device_attribute *attr,
> +					   char *buff)
> +{
> +	struct intel_gt *gt = intel_gt_sysfs_get_drvdata(dev, attr->attr.name);
> +	struct intel_rps *rps = &gt->rps;
> +	bool status = !!intel_rps_read_throttle_reason_status(rps);

why are these boolean? Can't we send whatever we read from the
register?

[...]

> +#define GT0_PERF_LIMIT_REASONS		_MMIO(0x1381A8)
> +#define   GT0_PERF_LIMIT_REASONS_MASK	0x00000de3

This mask is really weird! Sujaritha, can you please explain it?

It looks something like this,

  REG_GENMASK(11, 6) | REG_GENMASK(2, 0)

But I don't know if it improves any readability, in any case, the
mask is not clear.

> +#define   PROCHOT_MASK			BIT(1)
> +#define   THERMAL_LIMIT_MASK		BIT(2)
> +#define   RATL_MASK			BIT(6)
> +#define   VR_THERMALERT_MASK		BIT(7)
> +#define   VR_TDC_MASK			BIT(8)
> +#define   POWER_LIMIT_4_MASK		BIT(9)
> +#define   POWER_LIMIT_1_MASK		BIT(11)
> +#define   POWER_LIMIT_2_MASK		BIT(12)

I hope I got these right. Sujaritha, can you please check?

Andi

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-17 15:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-17 14:41 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 0/7] Introduce multitile support Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 14:41 ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 14:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 1/7] drm/i915: Rename INTEL_REGION_LMEM with INTEL_REGION_LMEM_0 Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 14:41   ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-28 19:53   ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2022-02-28 19:53     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2022-03-01 15:19   ` [Intel-gfx] " Andrzej Hajda
2022-03-01 15:19     ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-02-17 14:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 2/7] drm/i915: Prepare for multiple GTs Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 14:41   ` Andi Shyti
2022-03-01 15:15   ` [Intel-gfx] " Andrzej Hajda
2022-03-01 15:15     ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-03-06 19:20     ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2022-03-06 19:20       ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 14:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 3/7] drm/i915/gt: add gt_is_root() helper Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 14:41   ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-28 20:02   ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2022-03-01 15:25     ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-03-06 19:23       ` Andi Shyti
2022-03-06 19:23         ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 14:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 4/7] drm/i915/gt: create per-tile sysfs interface Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 14:41   ` Andi Shyti
2022-03-02 16:57   ` [Intel-gfx] " Andrzej Hajda
2022-03-02 16:57     ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-03-06 23:04     ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2022-03-06 23:04       ` Andi Shyti
2022-03-07 20:25       ` [Intel-gfx] " Andrzej Hajda
2022-03-07 20:25         ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-03-13 19:45         ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2022-03-13 19:45           ` Andi Shyti
2022-03-13 21:30           ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2022-03-13 21:30             ` Andi Shyti
2022-03-14 12:08           ` [Intel-gfx] " Andrzej Hajda
2022-03-14 12:08             ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-02-17 14:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 5/7] drm/i915/gt: Create per-tile RC6 " Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 14:41   ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 15:34   ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-02-17 15:53     ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 15:53       ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-18  9:12       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-02-18  9:21         ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-18  9:21           ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-18 10:46       ` Joonas Lahtinen
2022-02-21 17:12         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-02-22  8:57           ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-22  8:57             ` Andi Shyti
2022-11-07  0:08             ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-11-07  0:08               ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-02-17 20:49   ` kernel test robot
2022-02-17 20:49     ` kernel test robot
2022-02-17 23:53   ` kernel test robot
2022-02-17 23:53     ` kernel test robot
2022-02-17 23:53     ` kernel test robot
2022-03-03 10:19   ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-03-03 10:19     ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-03-13 22:15     ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2022-03-13 22:15       ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 14:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 6/7] drm/i915/gt: Create per-tile RPS sysfs interfaces Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 14:41   ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 19:47   ` [Intel-gfx] " kernel test robot
2022-02-17 19:47     ` kernel test robot
2022-03-03 10:55   ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-03-03 10:55     ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-03-13 23:09     ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2022-03-13 23:09       ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 14:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 7/7] drm/i915/gt: Adding new sysfs frequency attributes Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 14:41   ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 15:45   ` Andi Shyti [this message]
2022-02-17 15:45     ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 17:06     ` [Intel-gfx] " Sundaresan, Sujaritha
2022-02-17 17:06       ` Sundaresan, Sujaritha
2022-02-28 20:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2022-02-28 20:37     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2022-03-14  0:38     ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2022-03-14  0:38       ` Andi Shyti
2022-03-14  1:32       ` [Intel-gfx] " Sundaresan, Sujaritha
2022-03-14  1:32         ` Sundaresan, Sujaritha
2022-03-03 11:17   ` [Intel-gfx] " Andrzej Hajda
2022-03-03 11:17     ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-02-17 23:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Introduce multitile support Patchwork
2022-02-17 23:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-02-17 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2022-02-17 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: warning " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yg5tgepi3dkP6Y0M@intel.intel \
    --to=andi.shyti@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.