All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com>
To: andy.shevchenko@gmail.com
Cc: brgl@bgdev.pl, f.fainelli@gmail.com, fancer.lancer@gmail.com,
	hoan@os.amperecomputing.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, opendmb@gmail.com,
	schspa@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 01/15] gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 00:51:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220417165208.39754-1-schspa@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75Veo30c0BWb4Fykgvd-czSnEXsyA8wyMTeKQdS49=e5-nw@mail.gmail.com>

In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency
as the lockdep report shows.

__irq_set_handler
  irq_get_desc_buslock
    __irq_get_desc_lock
      raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags);  // raw spinlock get here
  __irq_do_set_handler
    mask_ack_irq
      dwapb_irq_ack
        spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock
  irq_put_desc_busunlock

Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access
registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad
influence.

[   15.090359][    T1] =============================
[   15.090365][    T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
[   15.090373][    T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted
[   15.090386][    T1] -----------------------------
[   15.090392][    T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock:
[   15.090402][    T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28
[   15.090470][    T1] other info that might help us debug this:
[   15.090477][    T1] context-{5:5}
[   15.090485][    T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1:
[   15.090497][    T1]  #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104
[   15.090553][    T1]  #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4
[   15.090606][    T1]  #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28
[   15.090654][    T1] stack backtrace:
[   15.090661][    T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3
[   15.090682][    T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT)
[   15.090692][    T1] Call trace:
......
[   15.090811][    T1]  _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28
[   15.090828][    T1]  dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300
[   15.090846][    T1]  __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c
[   15.090864][    T1]  __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114
[   15.090881][    T1]  irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58
[   15.090900][    T1]  gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644
......

Changelog:
v1 -> v2:
        - Reduce the useless stacktrace.
        - Split to series of patches

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220415165505.30383-1-schspa@gmail.com/

Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-mmio.c    | 22 +++++++++++-----------
 include/linux/gpio/driver.h |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mmio.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mmio.c
index c335a0309ba3..d9dff3dc92ae 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mmio.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mmio.c
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ static void bgpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int val)
 	unsigned long mask = bgpio_line2mask(gc, gpio);
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
 
 	if (val)
 		gc->bgpio_data |= mask;
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static void bgpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int val)
 
 	gc->write_reg(gc->reg_dat, gc->bgpio_data);
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
 }
 
 static void bgpio_set_with_clear(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio,
@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ static void bgpio_set_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int val)
 	unsigned long mask = bgpio_line2mask(gc, gpio);
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
 
 	if (val)
 		gc->bgpio_data |= mask;
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ static void bgpio_set_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int val)
 
 	gc->write_reg(gc->reg_set, gc->bgpio_data);
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
 }
 
 static void bgpio_multiple_get_masks(struct gpio_chip *gc,
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ static void bgpio_set_multiple_single_reg(struct gpio_chip *gc,
 	unsigned long flags;
 	unsigned long set_mask, clear_mask;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
 
 	bgpio_multiple_get_masks(gc, mask, bits, &set_mask, &clear_mask);
 
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ static void bgpio_set_multiple_single_reg(struct gpio_chip *gc,
 
 	gc->write_reg(reg, gc->bgpio_data);
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
 }
 
 static void bgpio_set_multiple(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned long *mask,
@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ static int bgpio_dir_in(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
 
 	gc->bgpio_dir &= ~bgpio_line2mask(gc, gpio);
 
@@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ static int bgpio_dir_in(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio)
 	if (gc->reg_dir_out)
 		gc->write_reg(gc->reg_dir_out, gc->bgpio_dir);
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static void bgpio_dir_out(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int val)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
 
 	gc->bgpio_dir |= bgpio_line2mask(gc, gpio);
 
@@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ static void bgpio_dir_out(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int val)
 	if (gc->reg_dir_out)
 		gc->write_reg(gc->reg_dir_out, gc->bgpio_dir);
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
 }
 
 static int bgpio_dir_out_dir_first(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio,
@@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ int bgpio_init(struct gpio_chip *gc, struct device *dev,
 	if (gc->bgpio_bits > BITS_PER_LONG)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	spin_lock_init(&gc->bgpio_lock);
+	raw_spin_lock_init(&gc->bgpio_lock);
 	gc->parent = dev;
 	gc->label = dev_name(dev);
 	gc->base = -1;
diff --git a/include/linux/gpio/driver.h b/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
index 874aabd270c9..ff8247a19f57 100644
--- a/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
+++ b/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ struct gpio_chip {
 	void __iomem *reg_dir_in;
 	bool bgpio_dir_unreadable;
 	int bgpio_bits;
-	spinlock_t bgpio_lock;
+	raw_spinlock_t bgpio_lock;
 	unsigned long bgpio_data;
 	unsigned long bgpio_dir;
 #endif /* CONFIG_GPIO_GENERIC */
-- 
2.24.3 (Apple Git-128)


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com>
To: andy.shevchenko@gmail.com
Cc: brgl@bgdev.pl, f.fainelli@gmail.com, fancer.lancer@gmail.com,
	hoan@os.amperecomputing.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, opendmb@gmail.com,
	schspa@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 01/15] gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 00:51:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220417165208.39754-1-schspa@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75Veo30c0BWb4Fykgvd-czSnEXsyA8wyMTeKQdS49=e5-nw@mail.gmail.com>

In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency
as the lockdep report shows.

__irq_set_handler
  irq_get_desc_buslock
    __irq_get_desc_lock
      raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags);  // raw spinlock get here
  __irq_do_set_handler
    mask_ack_irq
      dwapb_irq_ack
        spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock
  irq_put_desc_busunlock

Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access
registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad
influence.

[   15.090359][    T1] =============================
[   15.090365][    T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
[   15.090373][    T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted
[   15.090386][    T1] -----------------------------
[   15.090392][    T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock:
[   15.090402][    T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28
[   15.090470][    T1] other info that might help us debug this:
[   15.090477][    T1] context-{5:5}
[   15.090485][    T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1:
[   15.090497][    T1]  #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104
[   15.090553][    T1]  #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4
[   15.090606][    T1]  #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28
[   15.090654][    T1] stack backtrace:
[   15.090661][    T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3
[   15.090682][    T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT)
[   15.090692][    T1] Call trace:
......
[   15.090811][    T1]  _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28
[   15.090828][    T1]  dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300
[   15.090846][    T1]  __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c
[   15.090864][    T1]  __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114
[   15.090881][    T1]  irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58
[   15.090900][    T1]  gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644
......

Changelog:
v1 -> v2:
        - Reduce the useless stacktrace.
        - Split to series of patches

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220415165505.30383-1-schspa@gmail.com/

Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-mmio.c    | 22 +++++++++++-----------
 include/linux/gpio/driver.h |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mmio.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mmio.c
index c335a0309ba3..d9dff3dc92ae 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mmio.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mmio.c
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ static void bgpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int val)
 	unsigned long mask = bgpio_line2mask(gc, gpio);
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
 
 	if (val)
 		gc->bgpio_data |= mask;
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static void bgpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int val)
 
 	gc->write_reg(gc->reg_dat, gc->bgpio_data);
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
 }
 
 static void bgpio_set_with_clear(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio,
@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ static void bgpio_set_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int val)
 	unsigned long mask = bgpio_line2mask(gc, gpio);
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
 
 	if (val)
 		gc->bgpio_data |= mask;
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ static void bgpio_set_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int val)
 
 	gc->write_reg(gc->reg_set, gc->bgpio_data);
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
 }
 
 static void bgpio_multiple_get_masks(struct gpio_chip *gc,
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ static void bgpio_set_multiple_single_reg(struct gpio_chip *gc,
 	unsigned long flags;
 	unsigned long set_mask, clear_mask;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
 
 	bgpio_multiple_get_masks(gc, mask, bits, &set_mask, &clear_mask);
 
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ static void bgpio_set_multiple_single_reg(struct gpio_chip *gc,
 
 	gc->write_reg(reg, gc->bgpio_data);
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
 }
 
 static void bgpio_set_multiple(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned long *mask,
@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ static int bgpio_dir_in(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
 
 	gc->bgpio_dir &= ~bgpio_line2mask(gc, gpio);
 
@@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ static int bgpio_dir_in(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio)
 	if (gc->reg_dir_out)
 		gc->write_reg(gc->reg_dir_out, gc->bgpio_dir);
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static void bgpio_dir_out(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int val)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
 
 	gc->bgpio_dir |= bgpio_line2mask(gc, gpio);
 
@@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ static void bgpio_dir_out(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int val)
 	if (gc->reg_dir_out)
 		gc->write_reg(gc->reg_dir_out, gc->bgpio_dir);
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags);
 }
 
 static int bgpio_dir_out_dir_first(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio,
@@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ int bgpio_init(struct gpio_chip *gc, struct device *dev,
 	if (gc->bgpio_bits > BITS_PER_LONG)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	spin_lock_init(&gc->bgpio_lock);
+	raw_spin_lock_init(&gc->bgpio_lock);
 	gc->parent = dev;
 	gc->label = dev_name(dev);
 	gc->base = -1;
diff --git a/include/linux/gpio/driver.h b/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
index 874aabd270c9..ff8247a19f57 100644
--- a/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
+++ b/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ struct gpio_chip {
 	void __iomem *reg_dir_in;
 	bool bgpio_dir_unreadable;
 	int bgpio_bits;
-	spinlock_t bgpio_lock;
+	raw_spinlock_t bgpio_lock;
 	unsigned long bgpio_data;
 	unsigned long bgpio_dir;
 #endif /* CONFIG_GPIO_GENERIC */
-- 
2.24.3 (Apple Git-128)


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-17 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-15 16:55 [PATCH] gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data Schspa Shi
2022-04-15 16:55 ` Schspa Shi
2022-04-16  8:30 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-04-16  8:30   ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-04-17 16:51   ` Schspa Shi [this message]
2022-04-17 16:51     ` [PATCH v2 01/15] " Schspa Shi
2022-04-17 16:51     ` [PATCH v2 02/15] pinctrl: nuvoton: npcm7xx: use raw_spin_lock_irqsave for bgpio_lock Schspa Shi
2022-04-17 16:51       ` Schspa Shi
2022-04-17 16:51     ` [PATCH v2 03/15] gpio: tb10x: use raw lock " Schspa Shi
2022-04-17 16:51       ` Schspa Shi
2022-04-17 16:51     ` [PATCH v2 04/15] gpio: sifive: " Schspa Shi
2022-04-17 16:51       ` Schspa Shi
2022-04-17 16:51     ` [PATCH v2 05/15] gpio: mlxbf2: " Schspa Shi
2022-04-17 16:51       ` Schspa Shi
2022-04-17 16:51     ` [PATCH v2 06/15] gpio: menz127: " Schspa Shi
2022-04-17 16:51       ` Schspa Shi
2022-04-17 16:52     ` [PATCH v2 07/15] gpio: loongson1: " Schspa Shi
2022-04-17 16:52       ` Schspa Shi
2022-04-17 16:52     ` [PATCH v2 08/15] gpio: ixp4xx: " Schspa Shi
2022-04-17 16:52       ` Schspa Shi
2022-04-17 16:52     ` [PATCH v2 09/15] gpio: idt3243x: " Schspa Shi
2022-04-17 16:52       ` Schspa Shi
2022-04-17 16:52     ` [PATCH v2 10/15] gpio: hlwd: " Schspa Shi
2022-04-17 16:52       ` Schspa Shi
2022-04-17 16:52     ` [PATCH v2 11/15] gpio: grgpio: " Schspa Shi
2022-04-17 16:52       ` Schspa Shi
2022-04-17 16:52     ` [PATCH v2 12/15] gpio: dwapb: " Schspa Shi
2022-04-17 16:52       ` Schspa Shi
2022-04-17 16:52     ` [PATCH v2 13/15] gpio: cadence: " Schspa Shi
2022-04-17 16:52       ` Schspa Shi
2022-04-17 16:52     ` [PATCH v2 14/15] gpio: brcmstb: " Schspa Shi
2022-04-17 16:52       ` Schspa Shi
2022-04-17 16:52     ` [PATCH v2 15/15] gpio: amdpt: " Schspa Shi
2022-04-17 16:52       ` Schspa Shi
     [not found]     ` <CAHp75Vc8HwheQVOpcn_Lxk-bOOMLybr=m6OdO7mJ-vE9xywBLg@mail.gmail.com>
2022-04-18  3:07       ` [PATCH] gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data Schspa Shi
2022-04-18  3:07         ` Schspa Shi
2022-04-18 11:38         ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-04-18 11:38           ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-04-18 11:39           ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-04-18 11:39             ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-04-18 15:43             ` Schspa Shi
2022-04-18 15:43               ` Schspa Shi
2022-04-18 19:01               ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-04-18 19:01                 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-04-19  1:28                 ` [PATCH v3] " Schspa Shi
2022-04-19  1:28                   ` Schspa Shi
2022-04-19  8:22                   ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-04-19  8:22                     ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-04-19 21:57                   ` Linus Walleij
2022-04-19 21:57                     ` Linus Walleij
2022-04-19 22:30                   ` Doug Berger
2022-04-19 22:30                     ` Doug Berger
2022-04-20  9:37                   ` Serge Semin
2022-04-20  9:37                     ` Serge Semin
2022-04-25 10:15                   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-04-25 10:15                     ` Bartosz Golaszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220417165208.39754-1-schspa@gmail.com \
    --to=schspa@gmail.com \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
    --cc=hoan@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=opendmb@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.