All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: "Kubalewski, Arkadiusz" <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
Cc: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org"
	<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Olech, Milena" <milena.olech@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v4 0/9] Create common DPLL configuration API
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 14:03:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230818140304.11f316c9@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR11MB4657374BF0A9361647444D239B1BA@DM6PR11MB4657.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 10:15:34 +0000 Kubalewski, Arkadiusz wrote:
> HW agnostic tests were submitted by Michal as RFC for test framework
> with fake modules implemented here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230817152209.23868-1-michal.michalik@intel.com/#t
> We had an agreement on latest dpll-meeting that we will follow up with
> patches that would test dpll over fake modules, and we have started it.
> As there was no requests to add HW-aware tests yet, we are not ready for
> such submission yet. We could probably extended Michal's framework to
> make it possible test real HW, but Michal's patches were just submitted,
> we do expect some review/changes there, thus we could think of adding
> something simpler for now..
> 
> Is simple bash script wrapping around cli.py and talking to ice dpll
> while verifying the outputs, an acceptable solution?

Okay, it is what it is, let's leave tests as follow up.

I'll reply to Michal on the RFC thread/
_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: "Kubalewski, Arkadiusz" <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>,
	Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Olech, Milena" <milena.olech@intel.com>,
	"Michalik, Michal" <michal.michalik@intel.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, poros <poros@redhat.com>,
	mschmidt <mschmidt@redhat.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	"intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org"
	<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/9] Create common DPLL configuration API
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 14:03:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230818140304.11f316c9@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR11MB4657374BF0A9361647444D239B1BA@DM6PR11MB4657.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 10:15:34 +0000 Kubalewski, Arkadiusz wrote:
> HW agnostic tests were submitted by Michal as RFC for test framework
> with fake modules implemented here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230817152209.23868-1-michal.michalik@intel.com/#t
> We had an agreement on latest dpll-meeting that we will follow up with
> patches that would test dpll over fake modules, and we have started it.
> As there was no requests to add HW-aware tests yet, we are not ready for
> such submission yet. We could probably extended Michal's framework to
> make it possible test real HW, but Michal's patches were just submitted,
> we do expect some review/changes there, thus we could think of adding
> something simpler for now..
> 
> Is simple bash script wrapping around cli.py and talking to ice dpll
> while verifying the outputs, an acceptable solution?

Okay, it is what it is, let's leave tests as follow up.

I'll reply to Michal on the RFC thread/

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: "Kubalewski, Arkadiusz" <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>,
	Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Olech, Milena" <milena.olech@intel.com>,
	"Michalik, Michal" <michal.michalik@intel.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, poros <poros@redhat.com>,
	mschmidt <mschmidt@redhat.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	"intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org"
	<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/9] Create common DPLL configuration API
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 14:03:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230818140304.11f316c9@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR11MB4657374BF0A9361647444D239B1BA@DM6PR11MB4657.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 10:15:34 +0000 Kubalewski, Arkadiusz wrote:
> HW agnostic tests were submitted by Michal as RFC for test framework
> with fake modules implemented here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230817152209.23868-1-michal.michalik@intel.com/#t
> We had an agreement on latest dpll-meeting that we will follow up with
> patches that would test dpll over fake modules, and we have started it.
> As there was no requests to add HW-aware tests yet, we are not ready for
> such submission yet. We could probably extended Michal's framework to
> make it possible test real HW, but Michal's patches were just submitted,
> we do expect some review/changes there, thus we could think of adding
> something simpler for now..
> 
> Is simple bash script wrapping around cli.py and talking to ice dpll
> while verifying the outputs, an acceptable solution?

Okay, it is what it is, let's leave tests as follow up.

I'll reply to Michal on the RFC thread/

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-18 21:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 111+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-11 20:03 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v4 0/9] Create common DPLL configuration API Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v4 1/9] dpll: documentation on DPLL subsystem interface Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15  2:52   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15  2:52     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15  2:52     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-11 20:03 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v4 2/9] dpll: spec: Add Netlink spec in YAML Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15  2:43   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15  2:43     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15  2:43     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-17 18:40     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-08-17 18:40       ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-08-17 18:40       ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-08-17 23:36       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-17 23:36         ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-17 23:36         ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-18  7:23         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jiri Pirko
2023-08-18  7:23           ` Jiri Pirko
2023-08-18  7:23           ` Jiri Pirko
2023-08-21 10:15           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-08-21 10:15             ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-08-21 10:15             ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-08-22 16:54             ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-22 16:54               ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-22 16:54               ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-11 20:03 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v4 3/9] dpll: core: Add DPLL framework base functions Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15  3:17   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15  3:17     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15  3:17     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15  6:00     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jiri Pirko
2023-08-15  6:00       ` Jiri Pirko
2023-08-15  6:00       ` Jiri Pirko
2023-08-15 18:20     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 18:20       ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 18:20       ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 18:28       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15 18:28         ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15 18:28         ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15 18:38         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 18:38           ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 18:38           ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v4 4/9] dpll: netlink: " Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15  3:23   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15  3:23     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15  3:23     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15  3:24   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15  3:24     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15  3:24     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15 15:18     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 15:18       ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 15:18       ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 16:55       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15 16:55         ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15 16:55         ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15 18:25         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 18:25           ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 18:25           ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v4 5/9] netdev: expose DPLL pin handle for netdevice Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v4 6/9] ice: add admin commands to access cgu configuration Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v4 7/9] ice: implement dpll interface to control cgu Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-12  6:19   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jiri Pirko
2023-08-12  6:19     ` Jiri Pirko
2023-08-12  6:19     ` Jiri Pirko
2023-08-11 20:03 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v4 8/9] ptp_ocp: implement DPLL ops Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v4 9/9] mlx5: Implement SyncE support using DPLL infrastructure Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-12  6:22 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v4 0/9] Create common DPLL configuration API Jiri Pirko
2023-08-12  6:22   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-08-12  6:22   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-08-12 11:20   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-12 11:20     ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-12 11:20     ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15  2:45 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15  2:45   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15  2:45   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15 11:36   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 11:36     ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 11:36     ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 11:52     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jiri Pirko
2023-08-15 11:52       ` Jiri Pirko
2023-08-15 11:52       ` Jiri Pirko
2023-08-15 14:32       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 14:32         ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 14:32         ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 17:02       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15 17:02         ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15 17:02         ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-18 10:15         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-08-18 10:15           ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-08-18 10:15           ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-08-18 21:03           ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-08-18 21:03             ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-18 21:03             ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230818140304.11f316c9@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=milena.olech@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.