All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>,
	Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Milena Olech <milena.olech@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v4 4/9] dpll: netlink: Add DPLL framework base functions
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 09:55:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230815095519.76d06274@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d5c30de7-df89-18dd-3ad8-a5d99c1e7108@linux.dev>

On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 16:18:16 +0100 Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> On 15/08/2023 04:24, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 21:03:35 +0100 Vadim Fedorenko wrote:  
> >> +	xa_for_each(&pin->dpll_refs, i, ref) {
> >> +		const struct dpll_pin_ops *ops = dpll_pin_ops(ref);
> >> +		struct dpll_device *dpll = ref->dpll;
> >> +
> >> +		if (!ops->frequency_set)
> >> +			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >> +		ret = ops->frequency_set(pin, dpll_pin_on_dpll_priv(dpll, pin),
> >> +					 dpll, dpll_priv(dpll), freq, extack);
> >> +		if (ret)
> >> +			return ret;
> >> +		__dpll_pin_change_ntf(pin);
> >> +	}  
> > 
> > only one freq is reported in get, AFAICT, so why send a notification
> > after each ref is updated?  
> 
> The pin can be technically connected to several DPLLs and app may watch
> for the specific DPLL messages only. We would like to inform all users 
> on any DPLL which has this pin connected to.

How does this end up looking in the notifications?
__dpll_pin_change_ntf() only takes the pin object, from a quick read 
it seems like it will generate the same notification multiple times.
_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>,
	Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Milena Olech <milena.olech@intel.com>,
	Michal Michalik <michal.michalik@intel.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, poros@redhat.com,
	mschmidt@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 4/9] dpll: netlink: Add DPLL framework base functions
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 09:55:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230815095519.76d06274@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d5c30de7-df89-18dd-3ad8-a5d99c1e7108@linux.dev>

On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 16:18:16 +0100 Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> On 15/08/2023 04:24, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 21:03:35 +0100 Vadim Fedorenko wrote:  
> >> +	xa_for_each(&pin->dpll_refs, i, ref) {
> >> +		const struct dpll_pin_ops *ops = dpll_pin_ops(ref);
> >> +		struct dpll_device *dpll = ref->dpll;
> >> +
> >> +		if (!ops->frequency_set)
> >> +			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >> +		ret = ops->frequency_set(pin, dpll_pin_on_dpll_priv(dpll, pin),
> >> +					 dpll, dpll_priv(dpll), freq, extack);
> >> +		if (ret)
> >> +			return ret;
> >> +		__dpll_pin_change_ntf(pin);
> >> +	}  
> > 
> > only one freq is reported in get, AFAICT, so why send a notification
> > after each ref is updated?  
> 
> The pin can be technically connected to several DPLLs and app may watch
> for the specific DPLL messages only. We would like to inform all users 
> on any DPLL which has this pin connected to.

How does this end up looking in the notifications?
__dpll_pin_change_ntf() only takes the pin object, from a quick read 
it seems like it will generate the same notification multiple times.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>,
	Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Milena Olech <milena.olech@intel.com>,
	Michal Michalik <michal.michalik@intel.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, poros@redhat.com,
	mschmidt@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 4/9] dpll: netlink: Add DPLL framework base functions
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 09:55:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230815095519.76d06274@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d5c30de7-df89-18dd-3ad8-a5d99c1e7108@linux.dev>

On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 16:18:16 +0100 Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> On 15/08/2023 04:24, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 21:03:35 +0100 Vadim Fedorenko wrote:  
> >> +	xa_for_each(&pin->dpll_refs, i, ref) {
> >> +		const struct dpll_pin_ops *ops = dpll_pin_ops(ref);
> >> +		struct dpll_device *dpll = ref->dpll;
> >> +
> >> +		if (!ops->frequency_set)
> >> +			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >> +		ret = ops->frequency_set(pin, dpll_pin_on_dpll_priv(dpll, pin),
> >> +					 dpll, dpll_priv(dpll), freq, extack);
> >> +		if (ret)
> >> +			return ret;
> >> +		__dpll_pin_change_ntf(pin);
> >> +	}  
> > 
> > only one freq is reported in get, AFAICT, so why send a notification
> > after each ref is updated?  
> 
> The pin can be technically connected to several DPLLs and app may watch
> for the specific DPLL messages only. We would like to inform all users 
> on any DPLL which has this pin connected to.

How does this end up looking in the notifications?
__dpll_pin_change_ntf() only takes the pin object, from a quick read 
it seems like it will generate the same notification multiple times.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-15 16:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 111+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-11 20:03 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v4 0/9] Create common DPLL configuration API Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v4 1/9] dpll: documentation on DPLL subsystem interface Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15  2:52   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15  2:52     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15  2:52     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-11 20:03 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v4 2/9] dpll: spec: Add Netlink spec in YAML Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15  2:43   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15  2:43     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15  2:43     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-17 18:40     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-08-17 18:40       ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-08-17 18:40       ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-08-17 23:36       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-17 23:36         ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-17 23:36         ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-18  7:23         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jiri Pirko
2023-08-18  7:23           ` Jiri Pirko
2023-08-18  7:23           ` Jiri Pirko
2023-08-21 10:15           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-08-21 10:15             ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-08-21 10:15             ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-08-22 16:54             ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-22 16:54               ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-22 16:54               ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-11 20:03 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v4 3/9] dpll: core: Add DPLL framework base functions Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15  3:17   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15  3:17     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15  3:17     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15  6:00     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jiri Pirko
2023-08-15  6:00       ` Jiri Pirko
2023-08-15  6:00       ` Jiri Pirko
2023-08-15 18:20     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 18:20       ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 18:20       ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 18:28       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15 18:28         ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15 18:28         ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15 18:38         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 18:38           ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 18:38           ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v4 4/9] dpll: netlink: " Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15  3:23   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15  3:23     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15  3:23     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15  3:24   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15  3:24     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15  3:24     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15 15:18     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 15:18       ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 15:18       ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 16:55       ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-08-15 16:55         ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15 16:55         ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15 18:25         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 18:25           ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 18:25           ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v4 5/9] netdev: expose DPLL pin handle for netdevice Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v4 6/9] ice: add admin commands to access cgu configuration Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v4 7/9] ice: implement dpll interface to control cgu Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-12  6:19   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jiri Pirko
2023-08-12  6:19     ` Jiri Pirko
2023-08-12  6:19     ` Jiri Pirko
2023-08-11 20:03 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v4 8/9] ptp_ocp: implement DPLL ops Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v4 9/9] mlx5: Implement SyncE support using DPLL infrastructure Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-12  6:22 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v4 0/9] Create common DPLL configuration API Jiri Pirko
2023-08-12  6:22   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-08-12  6:22   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-08-12 11:20   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-12 11:20     ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-12 11:20     ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15  2:45 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15  2:45   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15  2:45   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15 11:36   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 11:36     ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 11:36     ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 11:52     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jiri Pirko
2023-08-15 11:52       ` Jiri Pirko
2023-08-15 11:52       ` Jiri Pirko
2023-08-15 14:32       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 14:32         ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 14:32         ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 17:02       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15 17:02         ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15 17:02         ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-18 10:15         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-08-18 10:15           ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-08-18 10:15           ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-08-18 21:03           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-18 21:03             ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-18 21:03             ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230815095519.76d06274@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=milena.olech@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.