All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
	Xu Zhao <zhaoxu.35@bytedance.com>,
	Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 01/11] KVM: arm64: vgic: Make kvm_vgic_inject_irq() take a vcpu pointer
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 19:17:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230920181731.2232453-2-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230920181731.2232453-1-maz@kernel.org>

Passing a vcpu_id to kvm_vgic_inject_irq() is silly for two reasons:

- we often confuse vcpu_id and vcpu_idx
- we eventually have to convert it back to a vcpu
- we can't count

Instead, pass a vcpu pointer, which is unambiguous. A NULL vcpu
is also allowed for interrupts that are not private to a vcpu
(such as SPIs).

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c      |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c             | 20 ++++++++++----------
 arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c        |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-irqfd.c |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c       | 12 +++++-------
 include/kvm/arm_vgic.h           |  4 ++--
 6 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c
index 6dcdae4d38cb..1f828f3b854c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c
@@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ static void kvm_timer_update_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool new_level,
 				   timer_ctx->irq.level);
 
 	if (!userspace_irqchip(vcpu->kvm)) {
-		ret = kvm_vgic_inject_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->vcpu_id,
+		ret = kvm_vgic_inject_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu,
 					  timer_irq(timer_ctx),
 					  timer_ctx->irq.level,
 					  timer_ctx);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index 4866b3f7b4ea..872679a0cbd7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -1134,27 +1134,27 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_irq_line(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_irq_level *irq_level,
 			  bool line_status)
 {
 	u32 irq = irq_level->irq;
-	unsigned int irq_type, vcpu_idx, irq_num;
+	unsigned int irq_type, vcpu_id, irq_num;
 	int nrcpus = atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus);
 	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = NULL;
 	bool level = irq_level->level;
 
 	irq_type = (irq >> KVM_ARM_IRQ_TYPE_SHIFT) & KVM_ARM_IRQ_TYPE_MASK;
-	vcpu_idx = (irq >> KVM_ARM_IRQ_VCPU_SHIFT) & KVM_ARM_IRQ_VCPU_MASK;
-	vcpu_idx += ((irq >> KVM_ARM_IRQ_VCPU2_SHIFT) & KVM_ARM_IRQ_VCPU2_MASK) * (KVM_ARM_IRQ_VCPU_MASK + 1);
+	vcpu_id = (irq >> KVM_ARM_IRQ_VCPU_SHIFT) & KVM_ARM_IRQ_VCPU_MASK;
+	vcpu_id += ((irq >> KVM_ARM_IRQ_VCPU2_SHIFT) & KVM_ARM_IRQ_VCPU2_MASK) * (KVM_ARM_IRQ_VCPU_MASK + 1);
 	irq_num = (irq >> KVM_ARM_IRQ_NUM_SHIFT) & KVM_ARM_IRQ_NUM_MASK;
 
-	trace_kvm_irq_line(irq_type, vcpu_idx, irq_num, irq_level->level);
+	trace_kvm_irq_line(irq_type, vcpu_id, irq_num, irq_level->level);
 
 	switch (irq_type) {
 	case KVM_ARM_IRQ_TYPE_CPU:
 		if (irqchip_in_kernel(kvm))
 			return -ENXIO;
 
-		if (vcpu_idx >= nrcpus)
+		if (vcpu_id >= nrcpus)
 			return -EINVAL;
 
-		vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, vcpu_idx);
+		vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu_by_id(kvm, vcpu_id);
 		if (!vcpu)
 			return -EINVAL;
 
@@ -1166,17 +1166,17 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_irq_line(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_irq_level *irq_level,
 		if (!irqchip_in_kernel(kvm))
 			return -ENXIO;
 
-		if (vcpu_idx >= nrcpus)
+		if (vcpu_id >= nrcpus)
 			return -EINVAL;
 
-		vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, vcpu_idx);
+		vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu_by_id(kvm, vcpu_id);
 		if (!vcpu)
 			return -EINVAL;
 
 		if (irq_num < VGIC_NR_SGIS || irq_num >= VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS)
 			return -EINVAL;
 
-		return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, vcpu->vcpu_id, irq_num, level, NULL);
+		return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, vcpu, irq_num, level, NULL);
 	case KVM_ARM_IRQ_TYPE_SPI:
 		if (!irqchip_in_kernel(kvm))
 			return -ENXIO;
@@ -1184,7 +1184,7 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_irq_line(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_irq_level *irq_level,
 		if (irq_num < VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS)
 			return -EINVAL;
 
-		return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, 0, irq_num, level, NULL);
+		return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, NULL, irq_num, level, NULL);
 	}
 
 	return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
index 6b066e04dc5d..3afb281ed8d2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ static void kvm_pmu_update_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	pmu->irq_level = overflow;
 
 	if (likely(irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm))) {
-		int ret = kvm_vgic_inject_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->vcpu_id,
+		int ret = kvm_vgic_inject_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu,
 					      pmu->irq_num, overflow, pmu);
 		WARN_ON(ret);
 	}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-irqfd.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-irqfd.c
index 475059bacedf..8c711deb25aa 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-irqfd.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-irqfd.c
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ static int vgic_irqfd_set_irq(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e,
 
 	if (!vgic_valid_spi(kvm, spi_id))
 		return -EINVAL;
-	return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, 0, spi_id, level, NULL);
+	return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, NULL, spi_id, level, NULL);
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c
index 8be4c1ebdec2..db2a95762b1b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c
@@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ bool vgic_queue_irq_unlock(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq,
 /**
  * kvm_vgic_inject_irq - Inject an IRQ from a device to the vgic
  * @kvm:     The VM structure pointer
- * @cpuid:   The CPU for PPIs
+ * @vcpu:    The CPU for PPIs or NULL for global interrupts
  * @intid:   The INTID to inject a new state to.
  * @level:   Edge-triggered:  true:  to trigger the interrupt
  *			      false: to ignore the call
@@ -436,24 +436,22 @@ bool vgic_queue_irq_unlock(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq,
  * level-sensitive interrupts.  You can think of the level parameter as 1
  * being HIGH and 0 being LOW and all devices being active-HIGH.
  */
-int kvm_vgic_inject_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid, unsigned int intid,
-			bool level, void *owner)
+int kvm_vgic_inject_irq(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			unsigned int intid, bool level, void *owner)
 {
-	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
 	struct vgic_irq *irq;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int ret;
 
-	trace_vgic_update_irq_pending(cpuid, intid, level);
-
 	ret = vgic_lazy_init(kvm);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, cpuid);
 	if (!vcpu && intid < VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	trace_vgic_update_irq_pending(vcpu ? vcpu->vcpu_idx : 0, intid, level);
+
 	irq = vgic_get_irq(kvm, vcpu, intid);
 	if (!irq)
 		return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
index 5b27f94d4fad..8cc38e836f54 100644
--- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
+++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
@@ -375,8 +375,8 @@ int kvm_vgic_map_resources(struct kvm *kvm);
 int kvm_vgic_hyp_init(void);
 void kvm_vgic_init_cpu_hardware(void);
 
-int kvm_vgic_inject_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid, unsigned int intid,
-			bool level, void *owner);
+int kvm_vgic_inject_irq(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			unsigned int intid, bool level, void *owner);
 int kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int host_irq,
 			  u32 vintid, struct irq_ops *ops);
 int kvm_vgic_unmap_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int vintid);
-- 
2.34.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
	Xu Zhao <zhaoxu.35@bytedance.com>,
	Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 01/11] KVM: arm64: vgic: Make kvm_vgic_inject_irq() take a vcpu pointer
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 19:17:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230920181731.2232453-2-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230920181731.2232453-1-maz@kernel.org>

Passing a vcpu_id to kvm_vgic_inject_irq() is silly for two reasons:

- we often confuse vcpu_id and vcpu_idx
- we eventually have to convert it back to a vcpu
- we can't count

Instead, pass a vcpu pointer, which is unambiguous. A NULL vcpu
is also allowed for interrupts that are not private to a vcpu
(such as SPIs).

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c      |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c             | 20 ++++++++++----------
 arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c        |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-irqfd.c |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c       | 12 +++++-------
 include/kvm/arm_vgic.h           |  4 ++--
 6 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c
index 6dcdae4d38cb..1f828f3b854c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c
@@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ static void kvm_timer_update_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool new_level,
 				   timer_ctx->irq.level);
 
 	if (!userspace_irqchip(vcpu->kvm)) {
-		ret = kvm_vgic_inject_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->vcpu_id,
+		ret = kvm_vgic_inject_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu,
 					  timer_irq(timer_ctx),
 					  timer_ctx->irq.level,
 					  timer_ctx);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index 4866b3f7b4ea..872679a0cbd7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -1134,27 +1134,27 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_irq_line(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_irq_level *irq_level,
 			  bool line_status)
 {
 	u32 irq = irq_level->irq;
-	unsigned int irq_type, vcpu_idx, irq_num;
+	unsigned int irq_type, vcpu_id, irq_num;
 	int nrcpus = atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus);
 	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = NULL;
 	bool level = irq_level->level;
 
 	irq_type = (irq >> KVM_ARM_IRQ_TYPE_SHIFT) & KVM_ARM_IRQ_TYPE_MASK;
-	vcpu_idx = (irq >> KVM_ARM_IRQ_VCPU_SHIFT) & KVM_ARM_IRQ_VCPU_MASK;
-	vcpu_idx += ((irq >> KVM_ARM_IRQ_VCPU2_SHIFT) & KVM_ARM_IRQ_VCPU2_MASK) * (KVM_ARM_IRQ_VCPU_MASK + 1);
+	vcpu_id = (irq >> KVM_ARM_IRQ_VCPU_SHIFT) & KVM_ARM_IRQ_VCPU_MASK;
+	vcpu_id += ((irq >> KVM_ARM_IRQ_VCPU2_SHIFT) & KVM_ARM_IRQ_VCPU2_MASK) * (KVM_ARM_IRQ_VCPU_MASK + 1);
 	irq_num = (irq >> KVM_ARM_IRQ_NUM_SHIFT) & KVM_ARM_IRQ_NUM_MASK;
 
-	trace_kvm_irq_line(irq_type, vcpu_idx, irq_num, irq_level->level);
+	trace_kvm_irq_line(irq_type, vcpu_id, irq_num, irq_level->level);
 
 	switch (irq_type) {
 	case KVM_ARM_IRQ_TYPE_CPU:
 		if (irqchip_in_kernel(kvm))
 			return -ENXIO;
 
-		if (vcpu_idx >= nrcpus)
+		if (vcpu_id >= nrcpus)
 			return -EINVAL;
 
-		vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, vcpu_idx);
+		vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu_by_id(kvm, vcpu_id);
 		if (!vcpu)
 			return -EINVAL;
 
@@ -1166,17 +1166,17 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_irq_line(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_irq_level *irq_level,
 		if (!irqchip_in_kernel(kvm))
 			return -ENXIO;
 
-		if (vcpu_idx >= nrcpus)
+		if (vcpu_id >= nrcpus)
 			return -EINVAL;
 
-		vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, vcpu_idx);
+		vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu_by_id(kvm, vcpu_id);
 		if (!vcpu)
 			return -EINVAL;
 
 		if (irq_num < VGIC_NR_SGIS || irq_num >= VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS)
 			return -EINVAL;
 
-		return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, vcpu->vcpu_id, irq_num, level, NULL);
+		return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, vcpu, irq_num, level, NULL);
 	case KVM_ARM_IRQ_TYPE_SPI:
 		if (!irqchip_in_kernel(kvm))
 			return -ENXIO;
@@ -1184,7 +1184,7 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_irq_line(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_irq_level *irq_level,
 		if (irq_num < VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS)
 			return -EINVAL;
 
-		return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, 0, irq_num, level, NULL);
+		return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, NULL, irq_num, level, NULL);
 	}
 
 	return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
index 6b066e04dc5d..3afb281ed8d2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ static void kvm_pmu_update_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	pmu->irq_level = overflow;
 
 	if (likely(irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm))) {
-		int ret = kvm_vgic_inject_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->vcpu_id,
+		int ret = kvm_vgic_inject_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu,
 					      pmu->irq_num, overflow, pmu);
 		WARN_ON(ret);
 	}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-irqfd.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-irqfd.c
index 475059bacedf..8c711deb25aa 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-irqfd.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-irqfd.c
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ static int vgic_irqfd_set_irq(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e,
 
 	if (!vgic_valid_spi(kvm, spi_id))
 		return -EINVAL;
-	return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, 0, spi_id, level, NULL);
+	return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, NULL, spi_id, level, NULL);
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c
index 8be4c1ebdec2..db2a95762b1b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c
@@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ bool vgic_queue_irq_unlock(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq,
 /**
  * kvm_vgic_inject_irq - Inject an IRQ from a device to the vgic
  * @kvm:     The VM structure pointer
- * @cpuid:   The CPU for PPIs
+ * @vcpu:    The CPU for PPIs or NULL for global interrupts
  * @intid:   The INTID to inject a new state to.
  * @level:   Edge-triggered:  true:  to trigger the interrupt
  *			      false: to ignore the call
@@ -436,24 +436,22 @@ bool vgic_queue_irq_unlock(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq,
  * level-sensitive interrupts.  You can think of the level parameter as 1
  * being HIGH and 0 being LOW and all devices being active-HIGH.
  */
-int kvm_vgic_inject_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid, unsigned int intid,
-			bool level, void *owner)
+int kvm_vgic_inject_irq(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			unsigned int intid, bool level, void *owner)
 {
-	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
 	struct vgic_irq *irq;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int ret;
 
-	trace_vgic_update_irq_pending(cpuid, intid, level);
-
 	ret = vgic_lazy_init(kvm);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, cpuid);
 	if (!vcpu && intid < VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	trace_vgic_update_irq_pending(vcpu ? vcpu->vcpu_idx : 0, intid, level);
+
 	irq = vgic_get_irq(kvm, vcpu, intid);
 	if (!irq)
 		return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
index 5b27f94d4fad..8cc38e836f54 100644
--- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
+++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
@@ -375,8 +375,8 @@ int kvm_vgic_map_resources(struct kvm *kvm);
 int kvm_vgic_hyp_init(void);
 void kvm_vgic_init_cpu_hardware(void);
 
-int kvm_vgic_inject_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid, unsigned int intid,
-			bool level, void *owner);
+int kvm_vgic_inject_irq(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			unsigned int intid, bool level, void *owner);
 int kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int host_irq,
 			  u32 vintid, struct irq_ops *ops);
 int kvm_vgic_unmap_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int vintid);
-- 
2.34.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-20 18:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-20 18:17 [PATCH v2 00/11] KVM: arm64: Accelerate lookup of vcpus by MPIDR values (and other fixes) Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2023-09-20 18:17   ` [PATCH v2 01/11] KVM: arm64: vgic: Make kvm_vgic_inject_irq() take a vcpu pointer Marc Zyngier
2023-09-21  9:11   ` Zenghui Yu
2023-09-21  9:11     ` Zenghui Yu
2023-09-21 11:20     ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-21 11:20       ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Treat the collection target address as a vcpu_id Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-21  9:14   ` Zenghui Yu
2023-09-21  9:14     ` Zenghui Yu
2023-09-21 11:46     ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-21 11:46       ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-21 13:12       ` Zenghui Yu
2023-09-21 13:12         ` Zenghui Yu
2023-09-20 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: Refactor GICv3 SGI generation Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-21  9:42   ` Joey Gouly
2023-09-21  9:42     ` Joey Gouly
2023-09-21 11:13     ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-21 11:13       ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] KVM: arm64: vgic-v2: Use cpuid from userspace as vcpu_id Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] KVM: arm64: vgic: Use vcpu_idx for the debug information Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] KVM: arm64: Use vcpu_idx for invalidation tracking Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-21  9:16   ` Zenghui Yu
2023-09-21  9:16     ` Zenghui Yu
2023-09-21 12:58     ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-21 12:58       ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] KVM: arm64: Simplify kvm_vcpu_get_mpidr_aff() Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] KVM: arm64: Build MPIDR to vcpu index cache at runtime Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] KVM: arm64: Fast-track kvm_mpidr_to_vcpu() when mpidr_data is available Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: Optimize affinity-based SGI injection Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-21  9:32   ` Zenghui Yu
2023-09-21  9:32     ` Zenghui Yu
2023-09-20 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] KVM: arm64: Clarify the ordering requirements for vcpu/RD creation Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-21  2:11 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] KVM: arm64: Accelerate lookup of vcpus by MPIDR values (and other fixes) Oliver Upton
2023-09-21  2:11   ` Oliver Upton
2023-09-21  9:39 ` Zenghui Yu
2023-09-21  9:39   ` Zenghui Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230920181731.2232453-2-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhaoxu.35@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.