From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
Xu Zhao <zhaoxu.35@bytedance.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 02/11] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Treat the collection target address as a vcpu_id
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 19:17:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230920181731.2232453-3-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230920181731.2232453-1-maz@kernel.org>
Since our emulated ITS advertises GITS_TYPER.PTA=0, the target
address associated to a collection is a PE number and not
an address. So far, so good. However, the PE number is what userspace
has provided given us (aka the vcpu_id), and not the internal vcpu
index.
Make sure we consistently retrieve the vcpu by ID rather than
by index, adding a helper that deals with most of the cases.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
index 5fe2365a629f..4aadcd24f6f6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
@@ -378,6 +378,12 @@ static int update_affinity(struct vgic_irq *irq, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return ret;
}
+static struct kvm_vcpu *collection_to_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm,
+ struct its_collection *col)
+{
+ return kvm_get_vcpu_by_id(kvm, col->target_addr);
+}
+
/*
* Promotes the ITS view of affinity of an ITTE (which redistributor this LPI
* is targeting) to the VGIC's view, which deals with target VCPUs.
@@ -391,7 +397,7 @@ static void update_affinity_ite(struct kvm *kvm, struct its_ite *ite)
if (!its_is_collection_mapped(ite->collection))
return;
- vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, ite->collection->target_addr);
+ vcpu = collection_to_vcpu(kvm, ite->collection);
update_affinity(ite->irq, vcpu);
}
@@ -679,7 +685,7 @@ int vgic_its_resolve_lpi(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
if (!ite || !its_is_collection_mapped(ite->collection))
return E_ITS_INT_UNMAPPED_INTERRUPT;
- vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, ite->collection->target_addr);
+ vcpu = collection_to_vcpu(kvm, ite->collection);
if (!vcpu)
return E_ITS_INT_UNMAPPED_INTERRUPT;
@@ -887,7 +893,7 @@ static int vgic_its_cmd_handle_movi(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
return E_ITS_MOVI_UNMAPPED_COLLECTION;
ite->collection = collection;
- vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, collection->target_addr);
+ vcpu = collection_to_vcpu(kvm, collection);
vgic_its_invalidate_cache(kvm);
@@ -1121,7 +1127,7 @@ static int vgic_its_cmd_handle_mapi(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
}
if (its_is_collection_mapped(collection))
- vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, collection->target_addr);
+ vcpu = collection_to_vcpu(kvm, collection);
irq = vgic_add_lpi(kvm, lpi_nr, vcpu);
if (IS_ERR(irq)) {
@@ -1382,7 +1388,7 @@ static int vgic_its_cmd_handle_invall(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
if (!its_is_collection_mapped(collection))
return E_ITS_INVALL_UNMAPPED_COLLECTION;
- vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, collection->target_addr);
+ vcpu = collection_to_vcpu(kvm, collection);
vgic_its_invall(vcpu);
return 0;
@@ -1413,8 +1419,9 @@ static int vgic_its_cmd_handle_movall(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
if (target1_addr == target2_addr)
return 0;
- vcpu1 = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, target1_addr);
- vcpu2 = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, target2_addr);
+ /* We advertise GITS_TYPER.PTA==0, making the address the vcpu ID */
+ vcpu1 = kvm_get_vcpu_by_id(kvm, target1_addr);
+ vcpu2 = kvm_get_vcpu_by_id(kvm, target2_addr);
irq_count = vgic_copy_lpi_list(kvm, vcpu1, &intids);
if (irq_count < 0)
--
2.34.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
Xu Zhao <zhaoxu.35@bytedance.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 02/11] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Treat the collection target address as a vcpu_id
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 19:17:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230920181731.2232453-3-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230920181731.2232453-1-maz@kernel.org>
Since our emulated ITS advertises GITS_TYPER.PTA=0, the target
address associated to a collection is a PE number and not
an address. So far, so good. However, the PE number is what userspace
has provided given us (aka the vcpu_id), and not the internal vcpu
index.
Make sure we consistently retrieve the vcpu by ID rather than
by index, adding a helper that deals with most of the cases.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
index 5fe2365a629f..4aadcd24f6f6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
@@ -378,6 +378,12 @@ static int update_affinity(struct vgic_irq *irq, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return ret;
}
+static struct kvm_vcpu *collection_to_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm,
+ struct its_collection *col)
+{
+ return kvm_get_vcpu_by_id(kvm, col->target_addr);
+}
+
/*
* Promotes the ITS view of affinity of an ITTE (which redistributor this LPI
* is targeting) to the VGIC's view, which deals with target VCPUs.
@@ -391,7 +397,7 @@ static void update_affinity_ite(struct kvm *kvm, struct its_ite *ite)
if (!its_is_collection_mapped(ite->collection))
return;
- vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, ite->collection->target_addr);
+ vcpu = collection_to_vcpu(kvm, ite->collection);
update_affinity(ite->irq, vcpu);
}
@@ -679,7 +685,7 @@ int vgic_its_resolve_lpi(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
if (!ite || !its_is_collection_mapped(ite->collection))
return E_ITS_INT_UNMAPPED_INTERRUPT;
- vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, ite->collection->target_addr);
+ vcpu = collection_to_vcpu(kvm, ite->collection);
if (!vcpu)
return E_ITS_INT_UNMAPPED_INTERRUPT;
@@ -887,7 +893,7 @@ static int vgic_its_cmd_handle_movi(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
return E_ITS_MOVI_UNMAPPED_COLLECTION;
ite->collection = collection;
- vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, collection->target_addr);
+ vcpu = collection_to_vcpu(kvm, collection);
vgic_its_invalidate_cache(kvm);
@@ -1121,7 +1127,7 @@ static int vgic_its_cmd_handle_mapi(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
}
if (its_is_collection_mapped(collection))
- vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, collection->target_addr);
+ vcpu = collection_to_vcpu(kvm, collection);
irq = vgic_add_lpi(kvm, lpi_nr, vcpu);
if (IS_ERR(irq)) {
@@ -1382,7 +1388,7 @@ static int vgic_its_cmd_handle_invall(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
if (!its_is_collection_mapped(collection))
return E_ITS_INVALL_UNMAPPED_COLLECTION;
- vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, collection->target_addr);
+ vcpu = collection_to_vcpu(kvm, collection);
vgic_its_invall(vcpu);
return 0;
@@ -1413,8 +1419,9 @@ static int vgic_its_cmd_handle_movall(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
if (target1_addr == target2_addr)
return 0;
- vcpu1 = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, target1_addr);
- vcpu2 = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, target2_addr);
+ /* We advertise GITS_TYPER.PTA==0, making the address the vcpu ID */
+ vcpu1 = kvm_get_vcpu_by_id(kvm, target1_addr);
+ vcpu2 = kvm_get_vcpu_by_id(kvm, target2_addr);
irq_count = vgic_copy_lpi_list(kvm, vcpu1, &intids);
if (irq_count < 0)
--
2.34.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-20 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-20 18:17 [PATCH v2 00/11] KVM: arm64: Accelerate lookup of vcpus by MPIDR values (and other fixes) Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] KVM: arm64: vgic: Make kvm_vgic_inject_irq() take a vcpu pointer Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-21 9:11 ` Zenghui Yu
2023-09-21 9:11 ` Zenghui Yu
2023-09-21 11:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-21 11:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2023-09-20 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Treat the collection target address as a vcpu_id Marc Zyngier
2023-09-21 9:14 ` Zenghui Yu
2023-09-21 9:14 ` Zenghui Yu
2023-09-21 11:46 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-21 11:46 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-21 13:12 ` Zenghui Yu
2023-09-21 13:12 ` Zenghui Yu
2023-09-20 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: Refactor GICv3 SGI generation Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-21 9:42 ` Joey Gouly
2023-09-21 9:42 ` Joey Gouly
2023-09-21 11:13 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-21 11:13 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] KVM: arm64: vgic-v2: Use cpuid from userspace as vcpu_id Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] KVM: arm64: vgic: Use vcpu_idx for the debug information Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] KVM: arm64: Use vcpu_idx for invalidation tracking Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-21 9:16 ` Zenghui Yu
2023-09-21 9:16 ` Zenghui Yu
2023-09-21 12:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-21 12:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] KVM: arm64: Simplify kvm_vcpu_get_mpidr_aff() Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] KVM: arm64: Build MPIDR to vcpu index cache at runtime Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] KVM: arm64: Fast-track kvm_mpidr_to_vcpu() when mpidr_data is available Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: Optimize affinity-based SGI injection Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-21 9:32 ` Zenghui Yu
2023-09-21 9:32 ` Zenghui Yu
2023-09-20 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] KVM: arm64: Clarify the ordering requirements for vcpu/RD creation Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-21 2:11 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] KVM: arm64: Accelerate lookup of vcpus by MPIDR values (and other fixes) Oliver Upton
2023-09-21 2:11 ` Oliver Upton
2023-09-21 9:39 ` Zenghui Yu
2023-09-21 9:39 ` Zenghui Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230920181731.2232453-3-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
--cc=zhaoxu.35@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.