All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com, rajvi.jingar@linux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH V6 12/20] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Allow pmc_core_ssram_init to fail
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 14:21:24 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231129222132.2331261-13-david.e.box@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231129222132.2331261-1-david.e.box@linux.intel.com>

Currently, if the PMC SSRAM initialization fails, no error is returned and
the only indication is that a PMC device has not been created.  Instead,
allow an error to be returned and handled directly by the caller.

Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
---
V6 - No change

V5 - No change

V4 - Remove return value check in mtl.c. Proper use of the value would
     require returning an error status from pmc_core_add_pmc(). But
     the function that calls it will be removed in the next patch so wait
     to use it then.

V3 - New patch split from V2 PATCH 9
   - Add dev_warn on pmc_core_ssram_init fail

 drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.h       |  2 +-
 drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core_ssram.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.h b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.h
index ccf24e0f5e50..edaa70067e41 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.h
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.h
@@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ int pmc_core_resume_common(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev);
 int get_primary_reg_base(struct pmc *pmc);
 extern void pmc_core_get_low_power_modes(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev);
 
-extern void pmc_core_ssram_init(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev);
+extern int pmc_core_ssram_init(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev);
 
 int spt_core_init(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev);
 int cnp_core_init(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev);
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core_ssram.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core_ssram.c
index 13fa16f0d52e..815950713e25 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core_ssram.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core_ssram.c
@@ -35,20 +35,20 @@ static inline u64 get_base(void __iomem *addr, u32 offset)
 	return lo_hi_readq(addr + offset) & GENMASK_ULL(63, 3);
 }
 
-static void
+static int
 pmc_core_pmc_add(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev, u64 pwrm_base,
 		 const struct pmc_reg_map *reg_map, int pmc_index)
 {
 	struct pmc *pmc = pmcdev->pmcs[pmc_index];
 
 	if (!pwrm_base)
-		return;
+		return -ENODEV;
 
 	/* Memory for primary PMC has been allocated in core.c */
 	if (!pmc) {
 		pmc = devm_kzalloc(&pmcdev->pdev->dev, sizeof(*pmc), GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (!pmc)
-			return;
+			return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 
 	pmc->map = reg_map;
@@ -57,10 +57,12 @@ pmc_core_pmc_add(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev, u64 pwrm_base,
 
 	if (!pmc->regbase) {
 		devm_kfree(&pmcdev->pdev->dev, pmc);
-		return;
+		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 
 	pmcdev->pmcs[pmc_index] = pmc;
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static void
@@ -96,7 +98,7 @@ pmc_core_ssram_get_pmc(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev, void __iomem *ssram, u32 offset,
 		iounmap(ssram);
 }
 
-void pmc_core_ssram_init(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev)
+int pmc_core_ssram_init(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev)
 {
 	void __iomem *ssram;
 	struct pci_dev *pcidev;
@@ -105,7 +107,7 @@ void pmc_core_ssram_init(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev)
 
 	pcidev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(0, 0, PCI_DEVFN(20, 2));
 	if (!pcidev)
-		goto out;
+		return -ENODEV;
 
 	ret = pcim_enable_device(pcidev);
 	if (ret)
@@ -123,11 +125,14 @@ void pmc_core_ssram_init(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev)
 	pmc_core_ssram_get_pmc(pmcdev, ssram, SSRAM_PCH_OFFSET, PMC_IDX_PCH);
 
 	iounmap(ssram);
-out:
-	return;
+
+	return 0;
 
 disable_dev:
+	pmcdev->ssram_pcidev = NULL;
 	pci_disable_device(pcidev);
 release_dev:
 	pci_dev_put(pcidev);
+
+	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-11-29 22:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-29 22:21 [PATCH V6 00/20] intel_pmc: Add telemetry API to read counters David E. Box
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 01/20] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Fix xa_alloc memory leak David E. Box
2023-11-30 11:02   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-12-04 13:51     ` Hans de Goede
2023-12-04 19:57       ` David E. Box
2023-12-04 20:13         ` Hans de Goede
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 02/20] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Remove unnecessary return David E. Box
2023-11-30 11:03   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 03/20] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Move structures to header David E. Box
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 04/20] platform/x86/intel/vsec: remove platform_info from vsec device structure David E. Box
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 05/20] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Use cleanup.h David E. Box
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 06/20] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Assign auxdev parent by argument David E. Box
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 07/20] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Add intel_vsec_register David E. Box
2023-11-30 11:23   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 08/20] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Add base address field David E. Box
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 09/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Add header to struct intel_pmt_entry David E. Box
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 10/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: telemetry: Export API to read telemetry David E. Box
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 11/20] platform/x86:intel/pmc: Call pmc_get_low_power_modes from platform init David E. Box
2023-11-29 22:21 ` David E. Box [this message]
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 13/20] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Cleanup SSRAM discovery David E. Box
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 14/20] platform/x86/intel/pmc/mtl: Use return value from pmc_core_ssram_init() David E. Box
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 15/20] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Find and register PMC telemetry entries David E. Box
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 16/20] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Display LPM requirements for multiple PMCs David E. Box
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 17/20] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Retrieve LPM information using Intel PMT David E. Box
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 18/20] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Read low power mode requirements for MTL-M and MTL-P David E. Box
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 19/20] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Add debug attribute for Die C6 counter David E. Box
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 20/20] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Show Die C6 counter on Meteor Lake David E. Box
2023-12-04 13:55 ` [PATCH V6 00/20] intel_pmc: Add telemetry API to read counters Hans de Goede

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231129222132.2331261-13-david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
    --to=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rajvi.jingar@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.