From: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com, rajvi.jingar@linux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH V6 16/20] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Display LPM requirements for multiple PMCs
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 14:21:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231129222132.2331261-17-david.e.box@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231129222132.2331261-1-david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
From: Rajvi Jingar <rajvi.jingar@linux.intel.com>
Update the substate_requirements attribute to display the requirements for
all the PMCs on a package.
Signed-off-by: Rajvi Jingar <rajvi.jingar@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
---
V6 - Add comment to document reason to check lpm_req_regs for NULL again
V5 - Use conditional instead of if/else to do seq_printf()
V4 - No change
V3 - Add missing submitter signoff
V2 - no change
drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c | 123 ++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
index 3894119d61b0..9d3a1b6ef622 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
@@ -728,7 +728,7 @@ static int pmc_core_substate_l_sts_regs_show(struct seq_file *s, void *unused)
}
DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(pmc_core_substate_l_sts_regs);
-static void pmc_core_substate_req_header_show(struct seq_file *s)
+static void pmc_core_substate_req_header_show(struct seq_file *s, int pmc_index)
{
struct pmc_dev *pmcdev = s->private;
int i, mode;
@@ -743,68 +743,81 @@ static void pmc_core_substate_req_header_show(struct seq_file *s)
static int pmc_core_substate_req_regs_show(struct seq_file *s, void *unused)
{
struct pmc_dev *pmcdev = s->private;
- struct pmc *pmc = pmcdev->pmcs[PMC_IDX_MAIN];
- const struct pmc_bit_map **maps = pmc->map->lpm_sts;
- const struct pmc_bit_map *map;
- const int num_maps = pmc->map->lpm_num_maps;
- u32 sts_offset = pmc->map->lpm_status_offset;
- u32 *lpm_req_regs = pmc->lpm_req_regs;
- int mp;
+ u32 sts_offset;
+ u32 *lpm_req_regs;
+ int num_maps, mp, pmc_index;
- /* Display the header */
- pmc_core_substate_req_header_show(s);
+ for (pmc_index = 0; pmc_index < ARRAY_SIZE(pmcdev->pmcs); ++pmc_index) {
+ struct pmc *pmc = pmcdev->pmcs[pmc_index];
+ const struct pmc_bit_map **maps;
- /* Loop over maps */
- for (mp = 0; mp < num_maps; mp++) {
- u32 req_mask = 0;
- u32 lpm_status;
- int mode, idx, i, len = 32;
+ if (!pmc)
+ continue;
+
+ maps = pmc->map->lpm_sts;
+ num_maps = pmc->map->lpm_num_maps;
+ sts_offset = pmc->map->lpm_status_offset;
+ lpm_req_regs = pmc->lpm_req_regs;
/*
- * Capture the requirements and create a mask so that we only
- * show an element if it's required for at least one of the
- * enabled low power modes
+ * When there are multiple PMCs, though the PMC may exist, the
+ * requirement register discovery could have failed so check
+ * before accessing.
*/
- pmc_for_each_mode(idx, mode, pmcdev)
- req_mask |= lpm_req_regs[mp + (mode * num_maps)];
-
- /* Get the last latched status for this map */
- lpm_status = pmc_core_reg_read(pmc, sts_offset + (mp * 4));
-
- /* Loop over elements in this map */
- map = maps[mp];
- for (i = 0; map[i].name && i < len; i++) {
- u32 bit_mask = map[i].bit_mask;
-
- if (!(bit_mask & req_mask))
- /*
- * Not required for any enabled states
- * so don't display
- */
- continue;
-
- /* Display the element name in the first column */
- seq_printf(s, "%30s |", map[i].name);
-
- /* Loop over the enabled states and display if required */
- pmc_for_each_mode(idx, mode, pmcdev) {
- if (lpm_req_regs[mp + (mode * num_maps)] & bit_mask)
- seq_printf(s, " %9s |",
- "Required");
- else
- seq_printf(s, " %9s |", " ");
+ if (!lpm_req_regs)
+ continue;
+
+ /* Display the header */
+ pmc_core_substate_req_header_show(s, pmc_index);
+
+ /* Loop over maps */
+ for (mp = 0; mp < num_maps; mp++) {
+ u32 req_mask = 0;
+ u32 lpm_status;
+ const struct pmc_bit_map *map;
+ int mode, idx, i, len = 32;
+
+ /*
+ * Capture the requirements and create a mask so that we only
+ * show an element if it's required for at least one of the
+ * enabled low power modes
+ */
+ pmc_for_each_mode(idx, mode, pmcdev)
+ req_mask |= lpm_req_regs[mp + (mode * num_maps)];
+
+ /* Get the last latched status for this map */
+ lpm_status = pmc_core_reg_read(pmc, sts_offset + (mp * 4));
+
+ /* Loop over elements in this map */
+ map = maps[mp];
+ for (i = 0; map[i].name && i < len; i++) {
+ u32 bit_mask = map[i].bit_mask;
+
+ if (!(bit_mask & req_mask)) {
+ /*
+ * Not required for any enabled states
+ * so don't display
+ */
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ /* Display the element name in the first column */
+ seq_printf(s, "pmc%d: %26s |", pmc_index, map[i].name);
+
+ /* Loop over the enabled states and display if required */
+ pmc_for_each_mode(idx, mode, pmcdev) {
+ bool required = lpm_req_regs[mp + (mode * num_maps)] &
+ bit_mask;
+ seq_printf(s, " %9s |", required ? "Required" : " ");
+ }
+
+ /* In Status column, show the last captured state of this agent */
+ seq_printf(s, " %9s |", lpm_status & bit_mask ? "Yes" : " ");
+
+ seq_puts(s, "\n");
}
-
- /* In Status column, show the last captured state of this agent */
- if (lpm_status & bit_mask)
- seq_printf(s, " %9s |", "Yes");
- else
- seq_printf(s, " %9s |", " ");
-
- seq_puts(s, "\n");
}
}
-
return 0;
}
DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(pmc_core_substate_req_regs);
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-29 22:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-29 22:21 [PATCH V6 00/20] intel_pmc: Add telemetry API to read counters David E. Box
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 01/20] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Fix xa_alloc memory leak David E. Box
2023-11-30 11:02 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-12-04 13:51 ` Hans de Goede
2023-12-04 19:57 ` David E. Box
2023-12-04 20:13 ` Hans de Goede
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 02/20] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Remove unnecessary return David E. Box
2023-11-30 11:03 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 03/20] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Move structures to header David E. Box
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 04/20] platform/x86/intel/vsec: remove platform_info from vsec device structure David E. Box
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 05/20] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Use cleanup.h David E. Box
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 06/20] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Assign auxdev parent by argument David E. Box
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 07/20] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Add intel_vsec_register David E. Box
2023-11-30 11:23 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 08/20] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Add base address field David E. Box
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 09/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Add header to struct intel_pmt_entry David E. Box
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 10/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: telemetry: Export API to read telemetry David E. Box
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 11/20] platform/x86:intel/pmc: Call pmc_get_low_power_modes from platform init David E. Box
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 12/20] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Allow pmc_core_ssram_init to fail David E. Box
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 13/20] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Cleanup SSRAM discovery David E. Box
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 14/20] platform/x86/intel/pmc/mtl: Use return value from pmc_core_ssram_init() David E. Box
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 15/20] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Find and register PMC telemetry entries David E. Box
2023-11-29 22:21 ` David E. Box [this message]
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 17/20] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Retrieve LPM information using Intel PMT David E. Box
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 18/20] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Read low power mode requirements for MTL-M and MTL-P David E. Box
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 19/20] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Add debug attribute for Die C6 counter David E. Box
2023-11-29 22:21 ` [PATCH V6 20/20] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Show Die C6 counter on Meteor Lake David E. Box
2023-12-04 13:55 ` [PATCH V6 00/20] intel_pmc: Add telemetry API to read counters Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231129222132.2331261-17-david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
--to=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rajvi.jingar@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.