All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: elver@google.com
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>,
	 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	 Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	 Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	 Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	 Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,  Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
	 Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	 Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
	 Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
	Kentaro Takeda <takedakn@nttdata.co.jp>,
	 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	 Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	 Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,  Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 llvm@lists.linux.dev, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,  linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 15/34] srcu: Support Clang's capability analysis
Date: Tue,  4 Mar 2025 10:21:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250304092417.2873893-16-elver@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250304092417.2873893-1-elver@google.com>

Add support for Clang's capability analysis for SRCU.

Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
---
 .../dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst         |  2 +-
 include/linux/srcu.h                          | 61 +++++++++++++------
 lib/test_capability-analysis.c                | 24 ++++++++
 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
index a14d796bcd0e..918e35d110df 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ Supported Kernel Primitives
 
 Currently the following synchronization primitives are supported:
 `raw_spinlock_t`, `spinlock_t`, `rwlock_t`, `mutex`, `seqlock_t`,
-`bit_spinlock`, RCU.
+`bit_spinlock`, RCU, SRCU (`srcu_struct`).
 
 For capabilities with an initialization function (e.g., `spin_lock_init()`),
 calling this function on the capability instance before initializing any
diff --git a/include/linux/srcu.h b/include/linux/srcu.h
index d7ba46e74f58..fde8bba191a5 100644
--- a/include/linux/srcu.h
+++ b/include/linux/srcu.h
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
 #include <linux/workqueue.h>
 #include <linux/rcu_segcblist.h>
 
-struct srcu_struct;
+struct_with_capability(srcu_struct);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
 
@@ -60,14 +60,14 @@ int init_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *ssp);
 void call_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *head,
 		void (*func)(struct rcu_head *head));
 void cleanup_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *ssp);
-int __srcu_read_lock(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp);
-void __srcu_read_unlock(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx) __releases(ssp);
+int __srcu_read_lock(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires_shared(ssp);
+void __srcu_read_unlock(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx) __releases_shared(ssp);
 #ifdef CONFIG_TINY_SRCU
 #define __srcu_read_lock_lite __srcu_read_lock
 #define __srcu_read_unlock_lite __srcu_read_unlock
 #else // #ifdef CONFIG_TINY_SRCU
-int __srcu_read_lock_lite(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp);
-void __srcu_read_unlock_lite(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx) __releases(ssp);
+int __srcu_read_lock_lite(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires_shared(ssp);
+void __srcu_read_unlock_lite(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx) __releases_shared(ssp);
 #endif // #else // #ifdef CONFIG_TINY_SRCU
 void synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp);
 
@@ -110,14 +110,16 @@ static inline bool same_state_synchronize_srcu(unsigned long oldstate1, unsigned
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE
-int __srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp);
-void __srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx) __releases(ssp);
+int __srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires_shared(ssp);
+void __srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx) __releases_shared(ssp);
 #else
 static inline int __srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
+	__acquires_shared(ssp)
 {
 	return __srcu_read_lock(ssp);
 }
 static inline void __srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
+	__releases_shared(ssp)
 {
 	__srcu_read_unlock(ssp, idx);
 }
@@ -189,6 +191,14 @@ static inline int srcu_read_lock_held(const struct srcu_struct *ssp)
 
 #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
 
+/*
+ * No-op helper to denote that ssp must be held. Because SRCU-protected pointers
+ * should still be marked with __rcu_guarded, and we do not want to mark them
+ * with __guarded_by(ssp) as it would complicate annotations for writers, we
+ * choose the following strategy: srcu_dereference_check() calls this helper
+ * that checks that the passed ssp is held, and then fake-acquires 'RCU'.
+ */
+static inline void __srcu_read_lock_must_hold(const struct srcu_struct *ssp) __must_hold_shared(ssp) { }
 
 /**
  * srcu_dereference_check - fetch SRCU-protected pointer for later dereferencing
@@ -202,9 +212,15 @@ static inline int srcu_read_lock_held(const struct srcu_struct *ssp)
  * to 1.  The @c argument will normally be a logical expression containing
  * lockdep_is_held() calls.
  */
-#define srcu_dereference_check(p, ssp, c) \
-	__rcu_dereference_check((p), __UNIQUE_ID(rcu), \
-				(c) || srcu_read_lock_held(ssp), __rcu)
+#define srcu_dereference_check(p, ssp, c)					\
+({										\
+	__srcu_read_lock_must_hold(ssp);					\
+	__acquire_shared_cap(RCU);						\
+	__auto_type __v = __rcu_dereference_check((p), __UNIQUE_ID(rcu),	\
+				(c) || srcu_read_lock_held(ssp), __rcu);	\
+	__release_shared_cap(RCU);						\
+	__v;									\
+})
 
 /**
  * srcu_dereference - fetch SRCU-protected pointer for later dereferencing
@@ -247,7 +263,8 @@ static inline int srcu_read_lock_held(const struct srcu_struct *ssp)
  * invoke srcu_read_unlock() from one task and the matching srcu_read_lock()
  * from another.
  */
-static inline int srcu_read_lock(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp)
+static inline int srcu_read_lock(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
+	__acquires_shared(ssp)
 {
 	int retval;
 
@@ -274,7 +291,8 @@ static inline int srcu_read_lock(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp)
  * where RCU is watching, that is, from contexts where it would be legal
  * to invoke rcu_read_lock().  Otherwise, lockdep will complain.
  */
-static inline int srcu_read_lock_lite(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp)
+static inline int srcu_read_lock_lite(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
+	__acquires_shared(ssp)
 {
 	int retval;
 
@@ -295,7 +313,8 @@ static inline int srcu_read_lock_lite(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp)
  * then none of the other flavors may be used, whether before, during,
  * or after.
  */
-static inline int srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp)
+static inline int srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
+	__acquires_shared(ssp)
 {
 	int retval;
 
@@ -307,7 +326,8 @@ static inline int srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp
 
 /* Used by tracing, cannot be traced and cannot invoke lockdep. */
 static inline notrace int
-srcu_read_lock_notrace(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp)
+srcu_read_lock_notrace(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
+	__acquires_shared(ssp)
 {
 	int retval;
 
@@ -337,7 +357,8 @@ srcu_read_lock_notrace(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp)
  * Calls to srcu_down_read() may be nested, similar to the manner in
  * which calls to down_read() may be nested.
  */
-static inline int srcu_down_read(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp)
+static inline int srcu_down_read(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
+	__acquires_shared(ssp)
 {
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(in_nmi());
 	srcu_check_read_flavor(ssp, SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_NORMAL);
@@ -352,7 +373,7 @@ static inline int srcu_down_read(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp)
  * Exit an SRCU read-side critical section.
  */
 static inline void srcu_read_unlock(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
-	__releases(ssp)
+	__releases_shared(ssp)
 {
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(idx & ~0x1);
 	srcu_check_read_flavor(ssp, SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_NORMAL);
@@ -368,7 +389,7 @@ static inline void srcu_read_unlock(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
  * Exit a light-weight SRCU read-side critical section.
  */
 static inline void srcu_read_unlock_lite(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
-	__releases(ssp)
+	__releases_shared(ssp)
 {
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(idx & ~0x1);
 	srcu_check_read_flavor(ssp, SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_LITE);
@@ -384,7 +405,7 @@ static inline void srcu_read_unlock_lite(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
  * Exit an SRCU read-side critical section, but in an NMI-safe manner.
  */
 static inline void srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
-	__releases(ssp)
+	__releases_shared(ssp)
 {
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(idx & ~0x1);
 	srcu_check_read_flavor(ssp, SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_NMI);
@@ -394,7 +415,7 @@ static inline void srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
 
 /* Used by tracing, cannot be traced and cannot call lockdep. */
 static inline notrace void
-srcu_read_unlock_notrace(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx) __releases(ssp)
+srcu_read_unlock_notrace(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx) __releases_shared(ssp)
 {
 	srcu_check_read_flavor(ssp, SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_NORMAL);
 	__srcu_read_unlock(ssp, idx);
@@ -409,7 +430,7 @@ srcu_read_unlock_notrace(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx) __releases(ssp)
  * the same context as the maching srcu_down_read().
  */
 static inline void srcu_up_read(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
-	__releases(ssp)
+	__releases_shared(ssp)
 {
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(idx & ~0x1);
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(in_nmi());
diff --git a/lib/test_capability-analysis.c b/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
index 050fa7c9fcba..63d81ad1562f 100644
--- a/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
+++ b/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
 #include <linux/seqlock.h>
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
+#include <linux/srcu.h>
 
 /*
  * Test that helper macros work as expected.
@@ -345,3 +346,26 @@ static void __used test_rcu_assert_variants(void)
 	lockdep_assert_in_rcu_read_lock_sched();
 	wants_rcu_held_sched();
 }
+
+struct test_srcu_data {
+	struct srcu_struct srcu;
+	long __rcu_guarded *data;
+};
+
+static void __used test_srcu(struct test_srcu_data *d)
+{
+	init_srcu_struct(&d->srcu);
+
+	int idx = srcu_read_lock(&d->srcu);
+	long *data = srcu_dereference(d->data, &d->srcu);
+	(void)data;
+	srcu_read_unlock(&d->srcu, idx);
+
+	rcu_assign_pointer(d->data, NULL);
+}
+
+static void __used test_srcu_guard(struct test_srcu_data *d)
+{
+	guard(srcu)(&d->srcu);
+	(void)srcu_dereference(d->data, &d->srcu);
+}
-- 
2.48.1.711.g2feabab25a-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-03-04  9:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-04  9:20 [PATCH v2 00/34] Compiler-Based Capability- and Locking-Analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 01/34] compiler_types: Move lock checking attributes to compiler-capability-analysis.h Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:26   ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-05  8:36   ` Dan Carpenter
2025-03-05  9:13     ` Marco Elver
2025-03-05  9:27       ` Dan Carpenter
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 02/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Add infrastructure for Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 15:29   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-04 16:05     ` Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 03/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Add test stub Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:52   ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-05  0:03     ` Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 04/34] Documentation: Add documentation for Compiler-Based Capability Analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 05/34] checkpatch: Warn about capability_unsafe() without comment Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 06/34] cleanup: Basic compatibility with capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 12:55   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-04 13:09     ` Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:57   ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 07/34] lockdep: Annotate lockdep assertions for " Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 08/34] locking/rwlock, spinlock: Support Clang's " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 14:30   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 09/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Change __cond_acquires to take return value Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 10/34] locking/mutex: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 11/34] locking/seqlock: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 12/34] bit_spinlock: Include missing <asm/processor.h> Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 13/34] bit_spinlock: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 14/34] rcu: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 16/34] kref: Add capability-analysis annotations Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 17/34] locking/rwsem: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 18/34] locking/local_lock: Include missing headers Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 19/34] locking/local_lock: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 20/34] locking/ww_mutex: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 21/34] debugfs: Make debugfs_cancellation a capability struct Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 22/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Remove Sparse support Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 23/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Remove __cond_lock() function-like helper Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:25   ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 24/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Introduce header suppressions Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 25/34] compiler: Let data_race() imply disabled capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 26/34] kfence: Enable " Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 27/34] kcov: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 28/34] stackdepot: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 29/34] rhashtable: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 30/34] printk: Move locking annotation to printk.c Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 31/34] drivers/tty: Enable capability analysis for core files Marco Elver
2025-03-05  9:15   ` Jiri Slaby
2025-03-05  9:26     ` Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 32/34] security/tomoyo: Enable capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 33/34] crypto: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 34/34] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Capability Analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:18   ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-04 11:21 ` [PATCH v2 00/34] Compiler-Based Capability- and Locking-Analysis Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-04 11:43   ` Marco Elver
2025-03-05 11:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-05 15:27   ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-05 16:16     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-06 13:36   ` Marco Elver

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250304092417.2873893-16-elver@google.com \
    --to=elver@google.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=justinstitt@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=morbo@google.com \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=takedakn@nttdata.co.jp \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.