From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Kentaro Takeda <takedakn@nttdata.co.jp>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/34] compiler_types: Move lock checking attributes to compiler-capability-analysis.h
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 10:13:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z8gVyLIU71Fg1QWK@elver.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f76a48fe-09da-41e0-be2e-e7f1b939b7e3@stanley.mountain>
On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 11:36AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 10:21:00AM +0100, Marco Elver wrote:
> > +#ifndef _LINUX_COMPILER_CAPABILITY_ANALYSIS_H
> > +#define _LINUX_COMPILER_CAPABILITY_ANALYSIS_H
> > +
> > +#ifdef __CHECKER__
> > +
> > +/* Sparse context/lock checking support. */
> > +# define __must_hold(x) __attribute__((context(x,1,1)))
> > +# define __acquires(x) __attribute__((context(x,0,1)))
> > +# define __cond_acquires(x) __attribute__((context(x,0,-1)))
> > +# define __releases(x) __attribute__((context(x,1,0)))
> > +# define __acquire(x) __context__(x,1)
> > +# define __release(x) __context__(x,-1)
> > +# define __cond_lock(x, c) ((c) ? ({ __acquire(x); 1; }) : 0)
> > +
>
> The other thing you might want to annotate is ww_mutex_destroy().
We can add an annotation to check the lock is not held:
diff --git a/include/linux/ww_mutex.h b/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
index 63978cb36a98..549d75aee76a 100644
--- a/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
+++ b/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
@@ -372,6 +372,7 @@ extern int __must_check ww_mutex_trylock(struct ww_mutex *lock,
* this function is called.
*/
static inline void ww_mutex_destroy(struct ww_mutex *lock)
+ __must_not_hold(lock)
{
#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
mutex_destroy(&lock->base);
diff --git a/lib/test_capability-analysis.c b/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
index 13e7732c38a2..1a466b362373 100644
--- a/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
+++ b/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
@@ -516,6 +516,8 @@ static void __used test_ww_mutex_lock_noctx(struct test_ww_mutex_data *d)
ww_mutex_lock_slow(&d->mtx, NULL);
d->counter++;
ww_mutex_unlock(&d->mtx);
+
+ ww_mutex_destroy(&d->mtx);
}
static void __used test_ww_mutex_lock_ctx(struct test_ww_mutex_data *d)
@@ -545,4 +547,6 @@ static void __used test_ww_mutex_lock_ctx(struct test_ww_mutex_data *d)
ww_acquire_done(&ctx);
ww_acquire_fini(&ctx);
+
+ ww_mutex_destroy(&d->mtx);
}
Probably a fixup for the ww_mutex patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250304092417.2873893-21-elver@google.com/
Or extra patch depending on when/if Peter decides to take the series.
> I'm happy about the new __guarded_by annotation.
Thanks!
-- Marco
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-05 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-04 9:20 [PATCH v2 00/34] Compiler-Based Capability- and Locking-Analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 01/34] compiler_types: Move lock checking attributes to compiler-capability-analysis.h Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:26 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-05 8:36 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-03-05 9:13 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2025-03-05 9:27 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 02/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Add infrastructure for Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 15:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-04 16:05 ` Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 03/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Add test stub Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-05 0:03 ` Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 04/34] Documentation: Add documentation for Compiler-Based Capability Analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 05/34] checkpatch: Warn about capability_unsafe() without comment Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 06/34] cleanup: Basic compatibility with capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 12:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-04 13:09 ` Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:57 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 07/34] lockdep: Annotate lockdep assertions for " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 08/34] locking/rwlock, spinlock: Support Clang's " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 14:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 09/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Change __cond_acquires to take return value Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 10/34] locking/mutex: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 11/34] locking/seqlock: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 12/34] bit_spinlock: Include missing <asm/processor.h> Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 13/34] bit_spinlock: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 14/34] rcu: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 15/34] srcu: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 16/34] kref: Add capability-analysis annotations Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 17/34] locking/rwsem: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 18/34] locking/local_lock: Include missing headers Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 19/34] locking/local_lock: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 20/34] locking/ww_mutex: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 21/34] debugfs: Make debugfs_cancellation a capability struct Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 22/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Remove Sparse support Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 23/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Remove __cond_lock() function-like helper Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:25 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 24/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Introduce header suppressions Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 25/34] compiler: Let data_race() imply disabled capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 26/34] kfence: Enable " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 27/34] kcov: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 28/34] stackdepot: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 29/34] rhashtable: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 30/34] printk: Move locking annotation to printk.c Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 31/34] drivers/tty: Enable capability analysis for core files Marco Elver
2025-03-05 9:15 ` Jiri Slaby
2025-03-05 9:26 ` Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 32/34] security/tomoyo: Enable capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 33/34] crypto: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 34/34] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Capability Analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:18 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-04 11:21 ` [PATCH v2 00/34] Compiler-Based Capability- and Locking-Analysis Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-04 11:43 ` Marco Elver
2025-03-05 11:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-05 15:27 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-05 16:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-06 13:36 ` Marco Elver
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z8gVyLIU71Fg1QWK@elver.google.com \
--to=elver@google.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=takedakn@nttdata.co.jp \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.