From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: elver@google.com
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Kentaro Takeda <takedakn@nttdata.co.jp>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 20/34] locking/ww_mutex: Support Clang's capability analysis
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 10:21:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250304092417.2873893-21-elver@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250304092417.2873893-1-elver@google.com>
Add support for Clang's capability analysis for ww_mutex.
The programming model for ww_mutex is subtly more complex than other
locking primitives when using ww_acquire_ctx. Encoding the respective
pre-conditions for ww_mutex lock/unlock based on ww_acquire_ctx state
using Clang's capability analysis makes incorrect use of the API harder.
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
---
v2:
* New patch.
---
.../dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst | 3 +-
include/linux/ww_mutex.h | 21 ++++--
lib/test_capability-analysis.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
index e892a5292841..51ea94b0f4cc 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
@@ -80,7 +80,8 @@ Supported Kernel Primitives
Currently the following synchronization primitives are supported:
`raw_spinlock_t`, `spinlock_t`, `rwlock_t`, `mutex`, `seqlock_t`,
-`bit_spinlock`, RCU, SRCU (`srcu_struct`), `rw_semaphore`, `local_lock_t`.
+`bit_spinlock`, RCU, SRCU (`srcu_struct`), `rw_semaphore`, `local_lock_t`,
+`ww_mutex`.
For capabilities with an initialization function (e.g., `spin_lock_init()`),
calling this function on the capability instance before initializing any
diff --git a/include/linux/ww_mutex.h b/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
index 45ff6f7a872b..e1d5455bd075 100644
--- a/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
+++ b/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ struct ww_class {
unsigned int is_wait_die;
};
-struct ww_mutex {
+struct_with_capability(ww_mutex) {
struct WW_MUTEX_BASE base;
struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx;
#ifdef DEBUG_WW_MUTEXES
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ struct ww_mutex {
#endif
};
-struct ww_acquire_ctx {
+struct_with_capability(ww_acquire_ctx) {
struct task_struct *task;
unsigned long stamp;
unsigned int acquired;
@@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ struct ww_acquire_ctx {
*/
static inline void ww_mutex_init(struct ww_mutex *lock,
struct ww_class *ww_class)
+ __asserts_cap(lock)
{
ww_mutex_base_init(&lock->base, ww_class->mutex_name, &ww_class->mutex_key);
lock->ctx = NULL;
@@ -141,6 +142,7 @@ static inline void ww_mutex_init(struct ww_mutex *lock,
*/
static inline void ww_acquire_init(struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx,
struct ww_class *ww_class)
+ __acquires(ctx) __no_capability_analysis
{
ctx->task = current;
ctx->stamp = atomic_long_inc_return_relaxed(&ww_class->stamp);
@@ -179,6 +181,7 @@ static inline void ww_acquire_init(struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx,
* data structures.
*/
static inline void ww_acquire_done(struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
+ __releases(ctx) __acquires_shared(ctx) __no_capability_analysis
{
#ifdef DEBUG_WW_MUTEXES
lockdep_assert_held(ctx);
@@ -196,6 +199,7 @@ static inline void ww_acquire_done(struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
* mutexes have been released with ww_mutex_unlock.
*/
static inline void ww_acquire_fini(struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
+ __releases_shared(ctx) __no_capability_analysis
{
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
mutex_release(&ctx->first_lock_dep_map, _THIS_IP_);
@@ -245,7 +249,8 @@ static inline void ww_acquire_fini(struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
*
* A mutex acquired with this function must be released with ww_mutex_unlock.
*/
-extern int /* __must_check */ ww_mutex_lock(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx);
+extern int /* __must_check */ ww_mutex_lock(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
+ __cond_acquires(0, lock) __must_hold(ctx);
/**
* ww_mutex_lock_interruptible - acquire the w/w mutex, interruptible
@@ -278,7 +283,8 @@ extern int /* __must_check */ ww_mutex_lock(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acq
* A mutex acquired with this function must be released with ww_mutex_unlock.
*/
extern int __must_check ww_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct ww_mutex *lock,
- struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx);
+ struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
+ __cond_acquires(0, lock) __must_hold(ctx);
/**
* ww_mutex_lock_slow - slowpath acquiring of the w/w mutex
@@ -305,6 +311,7 @@ extern int __must_check ww_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct ww_mutex *lock,
*/
static inline void
ww_mutex_lock_slow(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
+ __acquires(lock) __must_hold(ctx) __no_capability_analysis
{
int ret;
#ifdef DEBUG_WW_MUTEXES
@@ -342,6 +349,7 @@ ww_mutex_lock_slow(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
static inline int __must_check
ww_mutex_lock_slow_interruptible(struct ww_mutex *lock,
struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
+ __cond_acquires(0, lock) __must_hold(ctx)
{
#ifdef DEBUG_WW_MUTEXES
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!ctx->contending_lock);
@@ -349,10 +357,11 @@ ww_mutex_lock_slow_interruptible(struct ww_mutex *lock,
return ww_mutex_lock_interruptible(lock, ctx);
}
-extern void ww_mutex_unlock(struct ww_mutex *lock);
+extern void ww_mutex_unlock(struct ww_mutex *lock) __releases(lock);
extern int __must_check ww_mutex_trylock(struct ww_mutex *lock,
- struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx);
+ struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
+ __cond_acquires(true, lock) __must_hold(ctx);
/***
* ww_mutex_destroy - mark a w/w mutex unusable
diff --git a/lib/test_capability-analysis.c b/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
index 81c8e74548a9..853fdc53840f 100644
--- a/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
+++ b/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#include <linux/seqlock.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/srcu.h>
+#include <linux/ww_mutex.h>
/*
* Test that helper macros work as expected.
@@ -479,3 +480,67 @@ static void __used test_local_lock_guard(void)
{ guard(local_lock_irqsave)(&test_local_lock_data.lock); this_cpu_add(test_local_lock_data.counter, 1); }
{ guard(local_lock_nested_bh)(&test_local_lock_data.lock); this_cpu_add(test_local_lock_data.counter, 1); }
}
+
+static DEFINE_WD_CLASS(ww_class);
+
+struct test_ww_mutex_data {
+ struct ww_mutex mtx;
+ int counter __guarded_by(&mtx);
+};
+
+static void __used test_ww_mutex_init(struct test_ww_mutex_data *d)
+{
+ ww_mutex_init(&d->mtx, &ww_class);
+ d->counter = 0;
+}
+
+static void __used test_ww_mutex_lock_noctx(struct test_ww_mutex_data *d)
+{
+ if (!ww_mutex_lock(&d->mtx, NULL)) {
+ d->counter++;
+ ww_mutex_unlock(&d->mtx);
+ }
+
+ if (!ww_mutex_lock_interruptible(&d->mtx, NULL)) {
+ d->counter++;
+ ww_mutex_unlock(&d->mtx);
+ }
+
+ if (ww_mutex_trylock(&d->mtx, NULL)) {
+ d->counter++;
+ ww_mutex_unlock(&d->mtx);
+ }
+
+ ww_mutex_lock_slow(&d->mtx, NULL);
+ d->counter++;
+ ww_mutex_unlock(&d->mtx);
+}
+
+static void __used test_ww_mutex_lock_ctx(struct test_ww_mutex_data *d)
+{
+ struct ww_acquire_ctx ctx;
+
+ ww_acquire_init(&ctx, &ww_class);
+
+ if (!ww_mutex_lock(&d->mtx, &ctx)) {
+ d->counter++;
+ ww_mutex_unlock(&d->mtx);
+ }
+
+ if (!ww_mutex_lock_interruptible(&d->mtx, &ctx)) {
+ d->counter++;
+ ww_mutex_unlock(&d->mtx);
+ }
+
+ if (ww_mutex_trylock(&d->mtx, &ctx)) {
+ d->counter++;
+ ww_mutex_unlock(&d->mtx);
+ }
+
+ ww_mutex_lock_slow(&d->mtx, &ctx);
+ d->counter++;
+ ww_mutex_unlock(&d->mtx);
+
+ ww_acquire_done(&ctx);
+ ww_acquire_fini(&ctx);
+}
--
2.48.1.711.g2feabab25a-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-04 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-04 9:20 [PATCH v2 00/34] Compiler-Based Capability- and Locking-Analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 01/34] compiler_types: Move lock checking attributes to compiler-capability-analysis.h Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:26 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-05 8:36 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-03-05 9:13 ` Marco Elver
2025-03-05 9:27 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 02/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Add infrastructure for Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 15:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-04 16:05 ` Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 03/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Add test stub Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-05 0:03 ` Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 04/34] Documentation: Add documentation for Compiler-Based Capability Analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 05/34] checkpatch: Warn about capability_unsafe() without comment Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 06/34] cleanup: Basic compatibility with capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 12:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-04 13:09 ` Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:57 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 07/34] lockdep: Annotate lockdep assertions for " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 08/34] locking/rwlock, spinlock: Support Clang's " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 14:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 09/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Change __cond_acquires to take return value Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 10/34] locking/mutex: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 11/34] locking/seqlock: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 12/34] bit_spinlock: Include missing <asm/processor.h> Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 13/34] bit_spinlock: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 14/34] rcu: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 15/34] srcu: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 16/34] kref: Add capability-analysis annotations Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 17/34] locking/rwsem: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 18/34] locking/local_lock: Include missing headers Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 19/34] locking/local_lock: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 21/34] debugfs: Make debugfs_cancellation a capability struct Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 22/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Remove Sparse support Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 23/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Remove __cond_lock() function-like helper Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:25 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 24/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Introduce header suppressions Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 25/34] compiler: Let data_race() imply disabled capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 26/34] kfence: Enable " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 27/34] kcov: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 28/34] stackdepot: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 29/34] rhashtable: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 30/34] printk: Move locking annotation to printk.c Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 31/34] drivers/tty: Enable capability analysis for core files Marco Elver
2025-03-05 9:15 ` Jiri Slaby
2025-03-05 9:26 ` Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 32/34] security/tomoyo: Enable capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 33/34] crypto: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 34/34] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Capability Analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:18 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-04 11:21 ` [PATCH v2 00/34] Compiler-Based Capability- and Locking-Analysis Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-04 11:43 ` Marco Elver
2025-03-05 11:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-05 15:27 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-05 16:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-06 13:36 ` Marco Elver
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250304092417.2873893-21-elver@google.com \
--to=elver@google.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=takedakn@nttdata.co.jp \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.