All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>,
	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>,
	Jai Luthra <jai.luthra@ideasonboard.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/7] i2c: core: Move client towards fwnode
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 13:01:50 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250414100409.3910312-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> (raw)

The struct i2c_board_info has of_node and fwnode members. This is quite
confusing as they are of the same semantics and it's tend to have an issue
if user assigns both. Luckily there is only a single driver that does this
and fix is provided in the last patch. Nevertheless the series moves
the client handling code to use fwnode and deprecates the of_node member
in the respective documentation.

In v4:
- fixed spelling in the first patch commit message (Sakari)
- wrapped the commit message in the patch before the last (Sakari)
- added tag to the last patch (Tomi)

In v3:
- fixed compile issues with i2c-core-slave.c (LKP)
- fixed compile issues with IRQ APIs, i.e. missing header (LKP)
- added patch for the only user which assigns two fields (Tomi)
- added tags (Tomi)

In v2:
- covered i2c-core-slave.c where it makes sense
- covered i2c-core-of.c where it makes sense
- rebased on top of the latest code base

Andy Shevchenko (7):
  i2c: core: Drop duplicate check before calling OF APIs
  i2c: core: Unify the firmware node type check
  i2c: core: Switch to fwnode APIs to get IRQ
  i2c: core: Reuse fwnode variable where it makes sense
  i2c: core: Do not dereference fwnode in struct device
  i2c: core: Deprecate of_node in struct i2c_board_info
  media: i2c: ds90ub960: Remove of_node assignment

 drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c   | 61 +++++++++++++++++------------------
 drivers/i2c/i2c-core-of.c     |  1 -
 drivers/i2c/i2c-core-slave.c  | 12 ++++---
 drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c |  1 -
 include/linux/i2c.h           |  2 +-
 5 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

-- 
2.47.2


             reply	other threads:[~2025-04-14 10:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-14 10:01 Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2025-04-14 10:01 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] i2c: core: Drop duplicate check before calling OF APIs Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-14 10:01 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] i2c: core: Unify the firmware node type check Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-16  6:51   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-16  6:52     ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-14 10:01 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] i2c: core: Switch to fwnode APIs to get IRQ Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-15 20:06   ` Wolfram Sang
2025-04-16  6:23     ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-14 10:01 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] i2c: core: Reuse fwnode variable where it makes sense Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-14 10:01 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] i2c: core: Do not dereference fwnode in struct device Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-16  6:55   ` Wolfram Sang
2025-04-16  7:02     ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-16  7:20       ` Wolfram Sang
2025-04-16  7:26         ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-14 10:01 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] i2c: core: Deprecate of_node in struct i2c_board_info Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-15 20:10   ` Wolfram Sang
2025-04-16  6:24     ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-16  6:54       ` Wolfram Sang
2025-04-16  7:05         ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-16 13:00           ` Wolfram Sang
2025-04-16 15:29             ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-14 10:01 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] media: i2c: ds90ub960: Remove of_node assignment Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250414100409.3910312-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jai.luthra@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab+huawei@kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.