From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>,
Jai Luthra <jai.luthra@ideasonboard.com>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] i2c: core: Deprecate of_node in struct i2c_board_info
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 18:29:39 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z__M45ZIH_l1o9eH@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z_-p4HL2pUvEUvWg@shikoro>
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 03:00:16PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> > At least the main objective is to avoid new code using of_node.
> > The rest can slowly rotten on itself (esp. if there is any under
> > arch/ for some old board files).
>
> Do you know of some examples? I mainly found i2c-powermac and I3C core
> with my two approaches (coccinelle and grep+awk). But maybe my search
> pattern is weak?
At least the first one is what I have a WIP in my local tree.
I haven't checked much and I anyway forgot the results already
(it was at the time of v1, so a couple of weeks ago or so).
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-16 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-14 10:01 [PATCH v4 0/7] i2c: core: Move client towards fwnode Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-14 10:01 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] i2c: core: Drop duplicate check before calling OF APIs Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-14 10:01 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] i2c: core: Unify the firmware node type check Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-16 6:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-16 6:52 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-14 10:01 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] i2c: core: Switch to fwnode APIs to get IRQ Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-15 20:06 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-04-16 6:23 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-14 10:01 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] i2c: core: Reuse fwnode variable where it makes sense Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-14 10:01 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] i2c: core: Do not dereference fwnode in struct device Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-16 6:55 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-04-16 7:02 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-16 7:20 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-04-16 7:26 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-14 10:01 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] i2c: core: Deprecate of_node in struct i2c_board_info Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-15 20:10 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-04-16 6:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-16 6:54 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-04-16 7:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-16 13:00 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-04-16 15:29 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2025-04-14 10:01 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] media: i2c: ds90ub960: Remove of_node assignment Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z__M45ZIH_l1o9eH@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jai.luthra@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab+huawei@kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.