From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>,
Jai Luthra <jai.luthra@ideasonboard.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] i2c: core: Unify the firmware node type check
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 09:52:46 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z_9TvqfEK-HsQpmM@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z_9Ta5CpplHUTK_X@smile.fi.intel.com>
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 09:51:24AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 01:01:52PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > OF and ACPI currently are using asymmetrical APIs to check
> > for the firmware node type. Unify them by using is_*_node()
> > against struct fwnode_handle pointer.
>
> Note, media CI complains on wrong {} style, but
> 1) it was in the original code;
Ah, actually not, it was not in the original code, so I can improve that,
of course, in v5.
> 2) it is gone after the whole series applied.
>
> I suggest to ignore that report based on the above.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-16 6:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-14 10:01 [PATCH v4 0/7] i2c: core: Move client towards fwnode Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-14 10:01 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] i2c: core: Drop duplicate check before calling OF APIs Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-14 10:01 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] i2c: core: Unify the firmware node type check Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-16 6:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-16 6:52 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2025-04-14 10:01 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] i2c: core: Switch to fwnode APIs to get IRQ Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-15 20:06 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-04-16 6:23 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-14 10:01 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] i2c: core: Reuse fwnode variable where it makes sense Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-14 10:01 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] i2c: core: Do not dereference fwnode in struct device Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-16 6:55 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-04-16 7:02 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-16 7:20 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-04-16 7:26 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-14 10:01 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] i2c: core: Deprecate of_node in struct i2c_board_info Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-15 20:10 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-04-16 6:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-16 6:54 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-04-16 7:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-16 13:00 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-04-16 15:29 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-14 10:01 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] media: i2c: ds90ub960: Remove of_node assignment Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z_9TvqfEK-HsQpmM@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jai.luthra@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab+huawei@kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.