From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, yatsenko@meta.com, puranjay@kernel.org,
davidzalman.101@gmail.com, cheick.traore@foss.st.com,
chen.dylane@linux.dev, mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com,
ameryhung@gmail.com, menglong8.dong@gmail.com,
leon.hwang@linux.dev, kernel-patches-bot@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/3] selftests/bpf: Add union argument tests using fexit programs
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 23:52:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250916155211.61083-4-leon.hwang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250916155211.61083-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev>
By referencing
commit 1642a3945e223 ("selftests/bpf: Add struct argument tests with fentry/fexit programs."),
test the following cases for union argument support:
* 8B union argument.
* 16B union argument.
cd tools/testing/selftests/bpf
./test_progs -t tracing_struct/union_args
472/3 tracing_struct/union_args:OK
472 tracing_struct:OK
Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 93 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c
index 19e68d4b35327..6f8c0bfb04155 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c
@@ -112,10 +112,39 @@ static void test_struct_many_args(void)
tracing_struct_many_args__destroy(skel);
}
+static void test_union_args(void)
+{
+ struct tracing_struct *skel;
+ int err;
+
+ skel = tracing_struct__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "tracing_struct__open_and_load"))
+ return;
+
+ err = tracing_struct__attach(skel);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "tracing_struct__attach"))
+ goto out;
+
+ ASSERT_OK(trigger_module_test_read(256), "trigger_read");
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->ut1_a_a, 1, "ut1:a.arg.a");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->ut1_b, 4, "ut1:b");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->ut1_c, 5, "ut1:c");
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->ut2_a, 6, "ut2:a");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->ut2_b_a, 2, "ut2:b.arg.a");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->ut2_b_b, 3, "ut2:b.arg.b");
+
+out:
+ tracing_struct__destroy(skel);
+}
+
void test_tracing_struct(void)
{
if (test__start_subtest("struct_args"))
test_struct_args();
if (test__start_subtest("struct_many_args"))
test_struct_many_args();
+ if (test__start_subtest("union_args"))
+ test_union_args();
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c
index c435a3a8328ab..d460732e20239 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c
@@ -18,6 +18,18 @@ struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3 {
int b[];
};
+union bpf_testmod_union_arg_1 {
+ char a;
+ short b;
+ struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_1 arg;
+};
+
+union bpf_testmod_union_arg_2 {
+ int a;
+ long b;
+ struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_2 arg;
+};
+
long t1_a_a, t1_a_b, t1_b, t1_c, t1_ret, t1_nregs;
__u64 t1_reg0, t1_reg1, t1_reg2, t1_reg3;
long t2_a, t2_b_a, t2_b_b, t2_c, t2_ret;
@@ -26,6 +38,9 @@ long t4_a_a, t4_b, t4_c, t4_d, t4_e_a, t4_e_b, t4_ret;
long t5_ret;
int t6;
+long ut1_a_a, ut1_b, ut1_c;
+long ut2_a, ut2_b_a, ut2_b_b;
+
SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_1")
int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_arg_1, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_2, a, int, b, int, c)
{
@@ -130,4 +145,22 @@ int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_arg_11, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3 *, a)
return 0;
}
+SEC("fexit/bpf_testmod_test_union_arg_1")
+int BPF_PROG2(test_union_arg_1, union bpf_testmod_union_arg_1, a, int, b, int, c)
+{
+ ut1_a_a = a.arg.a;
+ ut1_b = b;
+ ut1_c = c;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("fexit/bpf_testmod_test_union_arg_2")
+int BPF_PROG2(test_union_arg_2, int, a, union bpf_testmod_union_arg_2, b)
+{
+ ut2_a = a;
+ ut2_b_a = b.arg.a;
+ ut2_b_b = b.arg.b;
+ return 0;
+}
+
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
index 2beb9b2fcbd87..9cd28de05960c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
@@ -62,6 +62,18 @@ struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_5 {
long d;
};
+union bpf_testmod_union_arg_1 {
+ char a;
+ short b;
+ struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_1 arg;
+};
+
+union bpf_testmod_union_arg_2 {
+ int a;
+ long b;
+ struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_2 arg;
+};
+
__bpf_hook_start();
noinline int
@@ -128,6 +140,20 @@ bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_9(u64 a, void *b, short c, int d, void *e, char f,
return bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result;
}
+noinline int
+bpf_testmod_test_union_arg_1(union bpf_testmod_union_arg_1 a, int b, int c)
+{
+ bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result = a.arg.a + b + c;
+ return bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result;
+}
+
+noinline int
+bpf_testmod_test_union_arg_2(int a, union bpf_testmod_union_arg_2 b)
+{
+ bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result = a + b.arg.a + b.arg.b;
+ return bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result;
+}
+
noinline int
bpf_testmod_test_arg_ptr_to_struct(struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_1 *a) {
bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result = a->a;
@@ -398,6 +424,8 @@ bpf_testmod_test_read(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj,
struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3 *struct_arg3;
struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4 struct_arg4 = {21, 22};
struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_5 struct_arg5 = {23, 24, 25, 26};
+ union bpf_testmod_union_arg_1 union_arg1 = { .arg = {1} };
+ union bpf_testmod_union_arg_2 union_arg2 = { .arg = {2, 3} };
int i = 1;
while (bpf_testmod_return_ptr(i))
@@ -415,6 +443,9 @@ bpf_testmod_test_read(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj,
(void)bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_9(16, (void *)17, 18, 19, (void *)20,
21, 22, struct_arg5, 27);
+ (void)bpf_testmod_test_union_arg_1(union_arg1, 4, 5);
+ (void)bpf_testmod_test_union_arg_2(6, union_arg2);
+
(void)bpf_testmod_test_arg_ptr_to_struct(&struct_arg1_2);
(void)trace_bpf_testmod_test_raw_tp_null_tp(NULL);
--
2.50.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-16 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-16 15:52 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] bpf: Allow union argument in trampoline based programs Leon Hwang
2025-09-16 15:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/3] " Leon Hwang
2025-09-16 21:35 ` Amery Hung
2025-09-17 12:40 ` Leon Hwang
2025-09-17 18:13 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-18 1:47 ` Leon Hwang
2025-09-16 15:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/3] bpf, x64: Add union argument support in trampoline Leon Hwang
2025-09-16 15:52 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2025-09-18 16:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/3] selftests/bpf: Add union argument tests using fexit programs Tao Chen
2025-09-19 1:47 ` Leon Hwang
2025-09-19 1:53 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-19 2:01 ` Leon Hwang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250916155211.61083-4-leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cheick.traore@foss.st.com \
--cc=chen.dylane@linux.dev \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davidzalman.101@gmail.com \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=menglong8.dong@gmail.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yatsenko@meta.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.