From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: palash.kambar@oss.qualcomm.com
Cc: olteanv@gmail.com, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
vkoul@kernel.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Add UFS PHY support on Hawi
Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 10:02:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260526100255.0D1BC1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260526090956.2340262-4-palash.kambar@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The Hawi UFS PHY configuration (`hawi_ufsphy_cfg`) lacks a fallback overlay for `UFS_HS_G4`, preventing proper initialization for UFS 3.1 or lower devices.
- [High] Incorrect HSGEAR_CAPABILITY value configured for the UFS HS Gear 5 overlay.
--
commit 1174a7d9d404cf84ecf6ba8228fcab24e26ef4df
Author: Palash Kambar <palash.kambar@oss.qualcomm.com>
phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Add UFS PHY support on Hawi
This commit adds the initialization sequence tables and configuration
for the UFS QMP PHY found in the Hawi SoC.
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c
> index 771bc7c2ab505..2fac3a7eb8201 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1844,6 +1867,119 @@ static const struct qmp_phy_cfg sm8750_ufsphy_cfg = {
>
> };
>
[ ... ]
> +static const struct qmp_phy_init_tbl hawi_ufsphy_g5_pcs[] = {
> + QMP_PHY_INIT_CFG(QPHY_V7_PCS_UFS_PLL_CNTL, 0x3b),
> + QMP_PHY_INIT_CFG(QPHY_V7_PCS_UFS_TX_HSGEAR_CAPABILITY, 0x06),
> + QMP_PHY_INIT_CFG(QPHY_V7_PCS_UFS_RX_HSGEAR_CAPABILITY, 0x06),
[Severity: High]
Does this code advertise an incorrect gear capability?
The overlay is named g5_pcs and the maximum supported gear is UFS_HS_G5, but
these capability registers are being programmed with 0x06. This typically maps
to a Gear 6 capability, which could cause link training failures or mismatches
during UFS negotiation if the value should actually be 0x05.
> +};
> +
> +static const struct qmp_phy_cfg hawi_ufsphy_cfg = {
> + .lanes = 2,
> +
> + .offsets = &qmp_ufs_offsets_v7,
> + .max_supported_gear = UFS_HS_G5,
> +
> + .tbls = {
> + .serdes = hawi_ufsphy_serdes,
> + .serdes_num = ARRAY_SIZE(hawi_ufsphy_serdes),
> + .tx = hawi_ufsphy_tx,
> + .tx_num = ARRAY_SIZE(hawi_ufsphy_tx),
> + .rx = hawi_ufsphy_rx,
> + .rx_num = ARRAY_SIZE(hawi_ufsphy_rx),
> + .pcs = hawi_ufsphy_pcs,
> + .pcs_num = ARRAY_SIZE(hawi_ufsphy_pcs),
> + },
> +
> + .tbls_hs_overlay[0] = {
> + .pcs = hawi_ufsphy_g5_pcs,
> + .pcs_num = ARRAY_SIZE(hawi_ufsphy_g5_pcs),
> + .max_gear = UFS_HS_G5,
> + },
[Severity: High]
Does this configuration lack a fallback overlay for UFS_HS_G4?
If the UFS host controller negotiates Gear 4 (for a UFS 3.1 device) or lower,
qmp_ufs_get_gear_overlay() will attempt to find the closest higher supported
gear overlay. Because floor_max_gear is initialized to cfg->max_supported_gear
(5), the fallback condition max_gear < floor_max_gear evaluates to 5 < 5 (false)
for this single available overlay.
This results in qmp_ufs_get_gear_overlay() returning -EINVAL with no overlay
applied, leaving critical PCS registers uninitialized and causing link
establishment to fail. Should a G4 overlay be added here similar to other
G5-capable PHYs like sm8750_ufsphy_cfg?
> +
> + .vreg_list = hawi_ufsphy_vreg_l,
> + .num_vregs = ARRAY_SIZE(hawi_ufsphy_vreg_l),
> + .regs = ufsphy_v7_regs_layout,
> +};
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260526090956.2340262-1-palash.kambar@oss.qualcomm.com?part=3
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: palash.kambar@oss.qualcomm.com
Cc: olteanv@gmail.com, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
vkoul@kernel.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Add UFS PHY support on Hawi
Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 10:02:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260526100255.0D1BC1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260526090956.2340262-4-palash.kambar@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The Hawi UFS PHY configuration (`hawi_ufsphy_cfg`) lacks a fallback overlay for `UFS_HS_G4`, preventing proper initialization for UFS 3.1 or lower devices.
- [High] Incorrect HSGEAR_CAPABILITY value configured for the UFS HS Gear 5 overlay.
--
commit 1174a7d9d404cf84ecf6ba8228fcab24e26ef4df
Author: Palash Kambar <palash.kambar@oss.qualcomm.com>
phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Add UFS PHY support on Hawi
This commit adds the initialization sequence tables and configuration
for the UFS QMP PHY found in the Hawi SoC.
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c
> index 771bc7c2ab505..2fac3a7eb8201 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1844,6 +1867,119 @@ static const struct qmp_phy_cfg sm8750_ufsphy_cfg = {
>
> };
>
[ ... ]
> +static const struct qmp_phy_init_tbl hawi_ufsphy_g5_pcs[] = {
> + QMP_PHY_INIT_CFG(QPHY_V7_PCS_UFS_PLL_CNTL, 0x3b),
> + QMP_PHY_INIT_CFG(QPHY_V7_PCS_UFS_TX_HSGEAR_CAPABILITY, 0x06),
> + QMP_PHY_INIT_CFG(QPHY_V7_PCS_UFS_RX_HSGEAR_CAPABILITY, 0x06),
[Severity: High]
Does this code advertise an incorrect gear capability?
The overlay is named g5_pcs and the maximum supported gear is UFS_HS_G5, but
these capability registers are being programmed with 0x06. This typically maps
to a Gear 6 capability, which could cause link training failures or mismatches
during UFS negotiation if the value should actually be 0x05.
> +};
> +
> +static const struct qmp_phy_cfg hawi_ufsphy_cfg = {
> + .lanes = 2,
> +
> + .offsets = &qmp_ufs_offsets_v7,
> + .max_supported_gear = UFS_HS_G5,
> +
> + .tbls = {
> + .serdes = hawi_ufsphy_serdes,
> + .serdes_num = ARRAY_SIZE(hawi_ufsphy_serdes),
> + .tx = hawi_ufsphy_tx,
> + .tx_num = ARRAY_SIZE(hawi_ufsphy_tx),
> + .rx = hawi_ufsphy_rx,
> + .rx_num = ARRAY_SIZE(hawi_ufsphy_rx),
> + .pcs = hawi_ufsphy_pcs,
> + .pcs_num = ARRAY_SIZE(hawi_ufsphy_pcs),
> + },
> +
> + .tbls_hs_overlay[0] = {
> + .pcs = hawi_ufsphy_g5_pcs,
> + .pcs_num = ARRAY_SIZE(hawi_ufsphy_g5_pcs),
> + .max_gear = UFS_HS_G5,
> + },
[Severity: High]
Does this configuration lack a fallback overlay for UFS_HS_G4?
If the UFS host controller negotiates Gear 4 (for a UFS 3.1 device) or lower,
qmp_ufs_get_gear_overlay() will attempt to find the closest higher supported
gear overlay. Because floor_max_gear is initialized to cfg->max_supported_gear
(5), the fallback condition max_gear < floor_max_gear evaluates to 5 < 5 (false)
for this single available overlay.
This results in qmp_ufs_get_gear_overlay() returning -EINVAL with no overlay
applied, leaving critical PCS registers uninitialized and causing link
establishment to fail. Should a G4 overlay be added here similar to other
G5-capable PHYs like sm8750_ufsphy_cfg?
> +
> + .vreg_list = hawi_ufsphy_vreg_l,
> + .num_vregs = ARRAY_SIZE(hawi_ufsphy_vreg_l),
> + .regs = ufsphy_v7_regs_layout,
> +};
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260526090956.2340262-1-palash.kambar@oss.qualcomm.com?part=3
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-26 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-26 9:09 [PATCH v3 0/3] Add Hawi UFS PHY and Controller support palash.kambar
2026-05-26 9:09 ` palash.kambar
2026-05-26 9:09 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy: Add Hawi UFS PHY compatible palash.kambar
2026-05-26 9:09 ` palash.kambar
2026-05-31 12:33 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-05-31 12:33 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-06-04 16:21 ` Palash Kambar
2026-06-04 16:21 ` Palash Kambar
2026-06-04 16:54 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-06-04 16:54 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-05-26 9:09 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] scsi: ufs: qcom: dt-bindings: Document the Hawi UFS controller palash.kambar
2026-05-26 9:09 ` palash.kambar
2026-05-26 9:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-26 9:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-31 12:34 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-05-31 12:34 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-05-26 9:09 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Add UFS PHY support on Hawi palash.kambar
2026-05-26 9:09 ` palash.kambar
2026-05-26 10:02 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-26 10:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 15:15 ` Palash Kambar
2026-06-08 15:15 ` Palash Kambar
2026-06-08 18:37 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-08 18:37 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-11 15:29 ` Vinod Koul
2026-06-11 15:29 ` Vinod Koul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260526100255.0D1BC1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=palash.kambar@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.