From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: palash.kambar@oss.qualcomm.com
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, mani@kernel.org,
alim.akhtar@samsung.com, bvanassche@acm.org,
andersson@kernel.org, dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com,
abel.vesa@oss.qualcomm.com, luca.weiss@fairphone.com,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, nitin.rawat@oss.qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy: Add Hawi UFS PHY compatible
Date: Sun, 31 May 2026 14:33:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260531-rigorous-gay-sturgeon-e8cfe2@quoll> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260526090956.2340262-2-palash.kambar@oss.qualcomm.com>
On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 02:39:54PM +0530, palash.kambar@oss.qualcomm.com wrote:
> From: Palash Kambar <palash.kambar@oss.qualcomm.com>
>
> Document QMP UFS PHY compatible for Hawi SoC.
Lack of compatibility is a mistake or intentional?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: palash.kambar@oss.qualcomm.com
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, mani@kernel.org,
alim.akhtar@samsung.com, bvanassche@acm.org,
andersson@kernel.org, dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com,
abel.vesa@oss.qualcomm.com, luca.weiss@fairphone.com,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, nitin.rawat@oss.qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy: Add Hawi UFS PHY compatible
Date: Sun, 31 May 2026 14:33:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260531-rigorous-gay-sturgeon-e8cfe2@quoll> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260526090956.2340262-2-palash.kambar@oss.qualcomm.com>
On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 02:39:54PM +0530, palash.kambar@oss.qualcomm.com wrote:
> From: Palash Kambar <palash.kambar@oss.qualcomm.com>
>
> Document QMP UFS PHY compatible for Hawi SoC.
Lack of compatibility is a mistake or intentional?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-31 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-26 9:09 [PATCH v3 0/3] Add Hawi UFS PHY and Controller support palash.kambar
2026-05-26 9:09 ` palash.kambar
2026-05-26 9:09 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy: Add Hawi UFS PHY compatible palash.kambar
2026-05-26 9:09 ` palash.kambar
2026-05-31 12:33 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2026-05-31 12:33 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-06-04 16:21 ` Palash Kambar
2026-06-04 16:21 ` Palash Kambar
2026-06-04 16:54 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-06-04 16:54 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-05-26 9:09 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] scsi: ufs: qcom: dt-bindings: Document the Hawi UFS controller palash.kambar
2026-05-26 9:09 ` palash.kambar
2026-05-26 9:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-26 9:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-31 12:34 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-05-31 12:34 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-05-26 9:09 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Add UFS PHY support on Hawi palash.kambar
2026-05-26 9:09 ` palash.kambar
2026-05-26 10:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-26 10:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 15:15 ` Palash Kambar
2026-06-08 15:15 ` Palash Kambar
2026-06-08 18:37 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-08 18:37 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-11 15:29 ` Vinod Koul
2026-06-11 15:29 ` Vinod Koul
2026-06-15 5:51 ` Palash Kambar
2026-06-15 5:51 ` Palash Kambar
2026-06-16 2:26 ` (subset) [PATCH v3 0/3] Add Hawi UFS PHY and Controller support Martin K. Petersen
2026-06-16 2:26 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260531-rigorous-gay-sturgeon-e8cfe2@quoll \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=abel.vesa@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.weiss@fairphone.com \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=nitin.rawat@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=palash.kambar@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.