From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: phucduc.bui@gmail.com
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] ASoC: fsl_asrc: Use guard() for spin locks
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 13:38:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260612133857.60AB91F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260612132639.78086-2-phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Unvalidated cleanup in fsl_asrc_release_pair() unconditionally releases a pair without an ownership check, causing hardware state corruption and channel count tracking errors if fsl_asrc_request_pair() fails.
--
commit f44cdf6b851bca6e946cdc01dc94cd1b9c6b9570
Author: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
ASoC: fsl_asrc: Use guard() for spin locks
Clean up the code using guard() for spin locks. Merely code refactoring,
and no behavior change.
> diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c
> index 5fda9b647c704..0b28bcfa47fed 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -265,19 +262,16 @@ static void fsl_asrc_release_pair(struct fsl_asrc_pair *pair)
> {
> struct fsl_asrc *asrc = pair->asrc;
> enum asrc_pair_index index = pair->index;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does fsl_asrc_release_pair() unconditionally
trust the pair's index without verifying ownership?
If fsl_asrc_request_pair() fails (for example, due to insufficient channels),
it returns an error but leaves pair->index and pair->channels unmodified.
The ALSA core handles this configuration failure by invoking the hw_free
callback on the error path:
sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c:fsl_asrc_dai_hw_free() {
...
if (pair)
fsl_asrc_release_pair(pair);
...
}
Since ownership isn't verified here, fsl_asrc_release_pair() blindly uses the
stale pair->index, forcefully disables the hardware register for that pair, and
adds the stale pair->channels back to asrc->channel_avail.
Could this abruptly destroy the active audio session of another process that
owns the pair, and artificially inflate the available channel count?
> - unsigned long lock_flags;
>
> /* Make sure the pair is disabled */
> regmap_update_bits(asrc->regmap, REG_ASRCTR,
> ASRCTR_ASRCEi_MASK(index), 0);
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&asrc->lock, lock_flags);
> + guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&asrc->lock);
>
> asrc->channel_avail += pair->channels;
> asrc->pair[index] = NULL;
> pair->error = 0;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260612132639.78086-1-phucduc.bui@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-12 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-12 13:26 [PATCH 00/11] ASoC: fsl: Use guard() for mutex & spin locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-12 13:26 ` [PATCH 01/11] ASoC: fsl_asrc: Use guard() for " phucduc.bui
2026-06-12 13:38 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-12 13:26 ` [PATCH 02/11] ASoC: fsl_audmix: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-12 13:26 ` [PATCH 03/11] ASoC: fsl_easrc: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-12 13:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 13:26 ` [PATCH 04/11] ASoC: fsl_esai: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-12 13:26 ` [PATCH 05/11] ASoC: fsl_spdif: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-12 13:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 13:26 ` [PATCH 06/11] ASoC: fsl_ssi: Use guard() for mutex locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-12 13:26 ` [PATCH 07/11] ASoC: fsl_xcvr: Use guard() for spin locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-12 13:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 13:26 ` [PATCH 08/11] ASoC: imx-audio-rpmsg: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-12 13:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 13:26 ` [PATCH 09/11] ASoC: fsl_rpmsg: Use guard() for mutex & " phucduc.bui
2026-06-12 13:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 13:26 ` [PATCH 10/11] ASoC: fsl: mpc5200_dma: Use guard() for " phucduc.bui
2026-06-12 13:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 13:26 ` [PATCH 11/11] ASoC: fsl: mpc5200_psc_ac97: Use guard() for mutex locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-12 13:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 15:05 ` Mark Brown
2026-06-12 21:42 ` Bui Duc Phuc
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260612133857.60AB91F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.