All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ranjan Kumar" <ranjan.kumar@broadcom.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 06/10] mpi3mr: Fix memory leak on operational queue creation failure
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 12:02:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260626120226.DC0BD1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260626114109.43685-7-ranjan.kumar@broadcom.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:

New issues:
- [High] The newly added cleanup loop unconditionally dereferences `req_qinfo` and `op_reply_qinfo`, causing a kernel panic if their initial allocations fail.

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Failure during reset leaves `num_op_req_q` non-zero but `req_qinfo` NULL, leading to a deferred kernel panic during driver cleanup.
- [High] The memory leak is not fully fixed: if a queue fails to create but the controller remains in a ready state, the partially allocated segments are leaked.
--

commit 9ead875c2a5e252d14e44cff611d464fadb0d332
Author: Ranjan Kumar <ranjan.kumar@broadcom.com>

mpi3mr: Fix memory leak on operational queue creation failure

This commit modifies the error handling path in mpi3mr_create_op_queues() 
to iterate over the number of queues and release the DMA memory segments 
before freeing the main queue information arrays.

> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_fw.c b/drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_fw.c
> index 32aeae20481ec..88444f04fb6a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_fw.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_fw.c
> @@ -2529,6 +2529,10 @@ static int mpi3mr_create_op_queues(struct mpi3mr_ioc *mrioc)
>  
>  	return retval;

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does this function still leak
memory if a queue fails to create and the controller remains ready?

If queue creation fails inside the allocation loop:

mpi3mr_create_op_queues() {
        ...
        for (i = 0; i < num_queues; i++) {
                if (mpi3mr_create_op_reply_q(mrioc, i)) {
                        break;
                }
        ...
}

The loop breaks, but if the controller state is still MRIOC_STATE_READY,
the function skips out_failed entirely, updates mrioc->num_op_req_q = i,
and returns 0. The segments allocated for the failed queue at index i
are abandoned and never cleaned up.

>  out_failed:
> +	for (i = 0; i < num_queues; i++) {
> +		mpi3mr_free_op_req_q_segments(mrioc, i);
> +		mpi3mr_free_op_reply_q_segments(mrioc, i);
> +	}

[Severity: High]
Will this cause a null pointer dereference if the initial queue information
allocation fails?

If kzalloc() fails to allocate mrioc->req_qinfo or mrioc->op_reply_qinfo
at the start of the function, execution jumps directly to out_failed.
This loop will then execute and call mpi3mr_free_op_req_q_segments(),
which blindly dereferences the unallocated array:

mpi3mr_free_op_req_q_segments() {
        ...
        segments = mrioc->req_qinfo[q_idx].q_segments;
        ...
}

>  	kfree(mrioc->req_qinfo);
>  	mrioc->req_qinfo = NULL;

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does freeing the array here lead to a
deferred crash if a controller reset fails?

If mpi3mr_create_op_queues() fails during a reset, mrioc->req_qinfo is
freed and set to null here, but mrioc->num_op_req_q retains its non-zero
value from before the reset.

Later, when the driver cleans up, mpi3mr_free_mem() loops up to the stale
num_op_req_q count and calls mpi3mr_free_op_req_q_segments(), which will
dereference the null req_qinfo array.

>

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260626114109.43685-1-ranjan.kumar@broadcom.com?part=6

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-26 12:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-26 11:40 [PATCH v1 00/10] mpi3mr: Few Enhancements and minor fixes Ranjan Kumar
2026-06-26 11:41 ` [PATCH v1 01/10] mpi3mr: Skip device shutdown during unload per controller configuration Ranjan Kumar
2026-06-26 12:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-26 11:41 ` [PATCH v1 02/10] mpi3mr: Update MPI Headers to revision 41 Ranjan Kumar
2026-06-26 12:07   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-26 11:41 ` [PATCH v1 03/10] mpi3mr: Add early timestamp synchronization after driver load Ranjan Kumar
2026-06-26 11:41 ` [PATCH v1 04/10] mpi3mr: Fix NVMe page size caching for non-operational devices Ranjan Kumar
2026-06-26 12:07   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-26 11:41 ` [PATCH v1 05/10] mpi3mr: Fix performance regression caused by extended IRQ poll sleep Ranjan Kumar
2026-06-26 12:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-26 11:41 ` [PATCH v1 06/10] mpi3mr: Fix memory leak on operational queue creation failure Ranjan Kumar
2026-06-26 12:02   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-26 11:41 ` [PATCH v1 07/10] mpi3mr: Fix firmware event reference leak during cleanup Ranjan Kumar
2026-06-26 12:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-26 11:41 ` [PATCH v1 08/10] mpi3mr: Fix SAS port allocation and registration error handling Ranjan Kumar
2026-06-26 12:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-26 11:41 ` [PATCH v1 09/10] mpi3mr: Fix SAS PHY cleanup in host addition error paths Ranjan Kumar
2026-06-26 12:16   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-26 11:41 ` [PATCH v1 10/10] mpi3mr: Driver version update to 8.18.0.8.50 Ranjan Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260626120226.DC0BD1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ranjan.kumar@broadcom.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.