All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 02/12] bpf: Add verifier support for 16-byte returns in R0:R2
Date: Wed,  8 Jul 2026 13:09:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260708200949.2156169-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708200939.2153664-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>

LLVM 23 added support for returning a value in two registers for an
__int128, or a struct/union whose size is greater than 8 but not more
than 16 bytes. See LLVM patches [1] and [2].

Before LLVM 23 the BPF backend could not return these values at all. A
by-value struct or union return (of any size) was rejected at compile
time with:

  error: aggregate returns are not supported

and an __int128 return failed later in the backend with:

  fatal error: error in backend: unable to allocate function return #1

Both are resolved in LLVM 23, which lowers such returns into the R0:R2
register pair.

This patch is one of several preparation patches that build up
<=16 byte return support incrementally:
  - the verifier R0:R2 modelling in this patch,
  - the x86 JIT move and JIT-capability gate,
  - precision-backtracking and live-register tracking of R2,
  - forcing the JIT for such programs, and
  - guarding the trampoline paths.
Finally, the patch "bpf: Enable 16-byte aggregate return types" enables
support for 16-byte returns.

This patch adds handling for '>8' byte returns in several places: BPF
subprogram returns (the main program, and both global and static
subprograms) and kfunc returns.

  [1] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/190894
  [2] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/206876

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 88 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 3f34ce1a3107..03ffb5f839fa 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -424,6 +424,35 @@ static bool subprog_returns_void(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int subprog)
 	return btf_type_is_void(type);
 }
 
+static bool bpf_ret_reg_pair(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int subprog)
+{
+	const struct btf_type *type, *func, *func_proto;
+	const struct btf *btf = env->prog->aux->btf;
+	u32 btf_id;
+
+	if (!btf || !env->prog->aux->func_info)
+		return false;
+
+	btf_id = env->prog->aux->func_info[subprog].type_id;
+
+	func = btf_type_by_id(btf, btf_id);
+	if (!func)
+		return false;
+
+	func_proto = btf_type_by_id(btf, func->type);
+	if (!func_proto)
+		return false;
+
+	type = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf, func_proto->type, NULL);
+	if (!type)
+		return false;
+
+	if (btf_type_is_struct(type) || btf_type_is_scalar(type))
+		return type->size > 8 && type->size <= 16;
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 static const char *subprog_name(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int subprog)
 {
 	struct bpf_func_info *info;
@@ -9459,10 +9488,17 @@ static int check_func_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
 		clear_caller_saved_regs(env, caller->regs);
 		invalidate_outgoing_stack_args(env, cur_func(env));
 
-		/* All non-void global functions return a 64-bit SCALAR_VALUE. */
+		/*
+		 * A non-void global function returns a 64-bit SCALAR_VALUE in
+		 * R0, or a >8 byte SCALAR_VALUE in the R0:R2 register pair.
+		 */
 		if (!subprog_returns_void(env, subprog)) {
 			mark_reg_unknown(env, caller->regs, BPF_REG_0);
 			caller->regs[BPF_REG_0].subreg_def = DEF_NOT_SUBREG;
+			if (bpf_ret_reg_pair(env, subprog)) {
+				mark_reg_unknown(env, caller->regs, BPF_REG_2);
+				caller->regs[BPF_REG_2].subreg_def = DEF_NOT_SUBREG;
+			}
 		}
 
 		if (env->subprog_info[subprog].might_throw) {
@@ -9825,6 +9861,13 @@ static int prepare_func_exit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int *insn_idx)
 	} else {
 		/* return to the caller whatever r0 had in the callee */
 		caller->regs[BPF_REG_0] = *r0;
+		if (bpf_ret_reg_pair(env, callee->subprogno)) {
+			if (callee->regs[BPF_REG_2].type == PTR_TO_STACK) {
+				verbose(env, "cannot return stack pointer to the caller\n");
+				return -EINVAL;
+			}
+			caller->regs[BPF_REG_2] = callee->regs[BPF_REG_2];
+		}
 	}
 
 	/* for callbacks like bpf_loop or bpf_for_each_map_elem go back to callsite,
@@ -10745,6 +10788,18 @@ static void mark_btf_func_reg_size(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
 	return __mark_btf_func_reg_size(env, cur_regs(env), regno, reg_size);
 }
 
+static void mark_kfunc_ret_reg_size(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
+				    struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 size)
+{
+	if (size > 8) {
+		mark_btf_func_reg_size(env, BPF_REG_0, 8);
+		mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, BPF_REG_2);
+		regs[BPF_REG_2].subreg_def = DEF_NOT_SUBREG;
+	} else {
+		mark_btf_func_reg_size(env, BPF_REG_0, size);
+	}
+}
+
 static bool is_kfunc_acquire(struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta *meta)
 {
 	return meta->kfunc_flags & KF_ACQUIRE;
@@ -13208,7 +13263,22 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
 		if (meta.btf == btf_vmlinux && (meta.func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_res_spin_lock] ||
 		    meta.func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_res_spin_lock_irqsave]))
 			__mark_reg_const_zero(env, &regs[BPF_REG_0]);
-		mark_btf_func_reg_size(env, BPF_REG_0, t->size);
+		mark_kfunc_ret_reg_size(env, regs, t->size);
+	} else if (btf_type_is_struct(t)) {
+		/*
+		 * The returned struct comes back as raw register bits modeled
+		 * as an unknown scalar, so it must contain only scalars:
+		 * otherwise a pointer field would be laundered into a scalar
+		 * and escape provenance and reference tracking.
+		 */
+		if (!__btf_type_is_scalar_struct(env, desc_btf, t, 0)) {
+			verbose(env, "kernel function %s returns %s %s that is not composed of scalars\n",
+				func_name, btf_type_str(t),
+				btf_name_by_offset(desc_btf, t->name_off));
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+		mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, BPF_REG_0);
+		mark_kfunc_ret_reg_size(env, regs, t->size);
 	} else if (btf_type_is_ptr(t)) {
 		ptr_type = btf_type_skip_modifiers(desc_btf, t->type, &ptr_type_id);
 		err = check_special_kfunc(env, &meta, regs, insn_aux, ptr_type, desc_btf);
@@ -16711,11 +16781,19 @@ static int check_global_subprog_return_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 {
 	struct bpf_func_state *cur_frame = cur_func(env);
 	u32 subprog = cur_frame->subprogno;
+	int err;
 
 	if (subprog_returns_void(env, subprog))
 		return 0;
 
-	return check_global_ret_scalar_reg(env, BPF_REG_0);
+	err = check_global_ret_scalar_reg(env, BPF_REG_0);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	if (!bpf_ret_reg_pair(env, subprog))
+		return 0;
+
+	return check_global_ret_scalar_reg(env, BPF_REG_2);
 }
 
 /* Bitmask with 1s for all caller saved registers */
@@ -17205,10 +17283,15 @@ static int process_bpf_exit_full(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 	 */
 	if (cur_frame->subprogno &&
 	    !cur_frame->in_async_callback_fn &&
-	    !cur_frame->in_exception_callback_fn)
+	    !cur_frame->in_exception_callback_fn) {
 		err = check_global_subprog_return_code(env);
-	else
+	} else {
+		if (!cur_frame->subprogno && bpf_ret_reg_pair(env, 0)) {
+			verbose(env, "return value larger than 8 bytes is not supported at program exit\n");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
 		err = check_return_code(env, BPF_REG_0, "R0");
+	}
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 	return PROCESS_BPF_EXIT;
-- 
2.53.0-Meta


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-08 20:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-08 20:09 [PATCH bpf-next 00/12] bpf: Support 16-byte return values in the R0:R2 register pair Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/12] bpf: Factor check_global_ret_scalar_reg() out of the global return check Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:09 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2026-07-08 21:17   ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/12] bpf: Add verifier support for 16-byte returns in R0:R2 bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 16:40     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-09 22:21   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  4:57     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/12] bpf: Wire up JIT support for 16-byte kfunc returns Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  0:06   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/12] bpf: Track R2 of register-pair returns in precision backtracking Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:10   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 16:41     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  0:31   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/12] bpf: Account R2 of register-pair returns in live register analysis Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:10   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 21:07   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  5:06     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/12] bpf: Force JIT for programs using the R0:R2 register pair Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:10   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09  3:15   ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-09 16:44     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-09 20:30   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  5:07     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-09 22:27   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  5:09     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/12] bpf: Reject >8 byte return values on return-reading trampoline paths Yonghong Song
2026-07-09  3:16   ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-09 16:52     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  2:01       ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-09 23:08   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  2:02     ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-10  5:27       ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  5:12     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/12] bpf: Enable 16-byte aggregate return types Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 19:40     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  0:45   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  5:29     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/12] selftests/bpf: Add C tests for 16-byte returns in R0:R2 Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 19:51     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:10   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 19:54     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  1:19   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  5:32     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/12] selftests/bpf: Add inline-asm and subprog tests for R0:R2 returns Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 19:57     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  1:38   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  5:35     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/12] selftests/bpf: Cover tracing on >8 and <=16 byte return targets Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/12] Documentation/bpf: Document 16-byte kfunc return values in R0:R2 Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  0:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 00/12] bpf: Support 16-byte return values in the R0:R2 register pair Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  6:00   ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  6:13     ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10 15:18       ` Yonghong Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260708200949.2156169-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.