All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 09/12] selftests/bpf: Add C tests for 16-byte returns in R0:R2
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 18:19:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cd58c8e1e7265ab59dff6882a2e429da97077fd6.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708201025.2160583-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>

On Wed, 2026-07-08 at 13:10 -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:
> Add selftests that exercise a 16-byte return value passed in the R0:R2
> register pair, expressed in C so they rely on the compiler lowering the
> register-pair return. Tests include an __int128 return (from a subprogram
> and a kfunc), a 16-byte struct return (from static and global subprograms
> and a kfunc) and a 16-byte union return.
> 
> The R0:R2 return convention is only emitted by LLVM 23 and newer, so the
> programs are gated on __clang_major__ >= 23; with an older compiler they
> return a sentinel and the "int128_c", "struct_c", "global_struct_c",
> "kfunc_struct_c" and "union_c" subtests are skipped.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
> ---

[...]

> +static void run_prog(struct bpf_program *prog, bool may_skip)
> +{
> +	char buf[64] = {};
> +	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts,
> +		.data_in = buf,
> +		.data_size_in = sizeof(buf),
> +		.repeat = 1,
> +	);
> +	int err;
> +
> +	err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(prog), &topts);
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run"))
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (may_skip && (int)topts.retval == -1) {
> +		test__skip();
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, 0, "aggregate_ret_result");
> +}
> +
> +void test_aggregate_ret(void)
> +{

The test_aggregate_ret()/run_prog() duplicate functionality provided
by the __retval tag from test_loader.c. To achieve the same skipping
mechanics I suggest to:
- extend test_loader.c / bpf_misc.h with a new tag: __skip("reason")
- use this tag as:

  #ifdef __clang_major__ >= 23

  SEC("tc")
  int aggregate_ret_test(struct __sk_buff *skb) { ... }

  #else

  SEC("tc") __skip("... need clang23 ...")
  int aggregate_ret_test(struct __sk_buff *skb) { ... }

  #endif

[...]

> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_int128_c.c ...
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_struct_c.c ...
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_union_c.c ...

Nit: all three files can be merged into one.

[...]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-10  1:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-08 20:09 [PATCH bpf-next 00/12] bpf: Support 16-byte return values in the R0:R2 register pair Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/12] bpf: Factor check_global_ret_scalar_reg() out of the global return check Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/12] bpf: Add verifier support for 16-byte returns in R0:R2 Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:17   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 16:40     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-09 22:21   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  4:57     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/12] bpf: Wire up JIT support for 16-byte kfunc returns Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  0:06   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/12] bpf: Track R2 of register-pair returns in precision backtracking Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:10   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 16:41     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  0:31   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/12] bpf: Account R2 of register-pair returns in live register analysis Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:10   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 21:07   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  5:06     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/12] bpf: Force JIT for programs using the R0:R2 register pair Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:10   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09  3:15   ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-09 16:44     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-09 20:30   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  5:07     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-09 22:27   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  5:09     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/12] bpf: Reject >8 byte return values on return-reading trampoline paths Yonghong Song
2026-07-09  3:16   ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-09 16:52     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  2:01       ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-09 23:08   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  2:02     ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-10  5:27       ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  5:12     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/12] bpf: Enable 16-byte aggregate return types Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 19:40     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  0:45   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  5:29     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/12] selftests/bpf: Add C tests for 16-byte returns in R0:R2 Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 19:51     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:10   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 19:54     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  1:19   ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2026-07-10  5:32     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/12] selftests/bpf: Add inline-asm and subprog tests for R0:R2 returns Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 19:57     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  1:38   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  5:35     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/12] selftests/bpf: Cover tracing on >8 and <=16 byte return targets Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/12] Documentation/bpf: Document 16-byte kfunc return values in R0:R2 Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  0:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 00/12] bpf: Support 16-byte return values in the R0:R2 register pair Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  6:00   ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  6:13     ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10 15:18       ` Yonghong Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cd58c8e1e7265ab59dff6882a2e429da97077fd6.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.