From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 11/12] selftests/bpf: Cover tracing on >8 and <=16 byte return targets
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2026 13:10:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260708201036.2162000-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708200939.2153664-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Tracing attach types differ in whether they need the target's return value
preserved across the BPF trampoline, which saves and restores only 8 bytes
of it. fentry runs before the target returns and never observes the return
value, so it can attach to a function returning a >8 byte value; fexit,
fmod_ret and fsession read the return value and must keep rejecting such a
target.
Add fentry, fexit, fentry_multi and fexit_multi tests that attach to
functions returning a >8 and <=16 byte value (a 16-byte struct and an
__int128).
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/aggregate_ret.c | 128 ++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_trace.c | 44 ++++++
.../selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c | 32 +++++
.../selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.h | 5 +
4 files changed, 209 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_trace.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/aggregate_ret.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/aggregate_ret.c
index 2f1e5c704959..7caf815a2c06 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/aggregate_ret.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/aggregate_ret.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
#include "aggregate_ret_run.skel.h"
#include "aggregate_ret_func.skel.h"
#include "aggregate_ret_kfunc.skel.h"
+#include "aggregate_ret_trace.skel.h"
/*
* Run one program and check its result. The program returns 0 on success, or
@@ -37,6 +38,131 @@ static void run_prog(struct bpf_program *prog, bool may_skip)
ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, 0, "aggregate_ret_result");
}
+/*
+ * Multi-attach (BPF_TRACE_*_MULTI) requires CONFIG_HAVE_SINGLE_FTRACE_DIRECT_OPS,
+ * which today only x86_64 selects. Otherwise bpf_tracing_multi_attach() returns
+ * -EOPNOTSUPP unconditionally.
+ */
+static bool tracing_multi_supported(struct bpf_program *prog)
+{
+ const char *small_pat = "bpf_testmod:bpf_testmod_trampoline_count_test";
+ struct bpf_link *link;
+
+ link = bpf_program__attach_tracing_multi(prog, small_pat, NULL);
+ if (libbpf_get_error(link) == -EOPNOTSUPP)
+ return false;
+ bpf_link__destroy(link);
+ return true;
+}
+
+static void test_tracing_attach_types(void)
+{
+ const char *i128_pat = "bpf_testmod:bpf_testmod_aggregate_ret_i128_fn";
+ int err;
+
+ if (test__start_subtest("trace_fentry")) {
+ struct aggregate_ret_trace *trace = NULL;
+
+ trace = aggregate_ret_trace__open();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(trace, "trace_fentry_open"))
+ return;
+
+ bpf_program__set_autoload(trace->progs.fexit_bpf_testmod_aggregate_ret_fn, false);
+ bpf_program__set_autoload(trace->progs.fentry_multi, false);
+ bpf_program__set_autoload(trace->progs.fexit_multi, false);
+
+ err = aggregate_ret_trace__load(trace);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "trace_fentry_load"))
+ goto destroy_trace_fentry;
+
+ err = aggregate_ret_trace__attach(trace);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "trace_fentry_attach"))
+ goto destroy_trace_fentry;
+
+ ASSERT_OK(trigger_module_test_read(1), "trace_fentry_trigger");
+ ASSERT_EQ(trace->bss->fentry_hit, 1, "trace_fentry_hit");
+
+destroy_trace_fentry:
+ aggregate_ret_trace__destroy(trace);
+ }
+
+ if (test__start_subtest("trace_fexit_reject")) {
+ struct aggregate_ret_trace *trace = NULL;
+
+ trace = aggregate_ret_trace__open();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(trace, "trace_fexit_open"))
+ return;
+
+ bpf_program__set_autoload(trace->progs.fentry_bpf_testmod_aggregate_ret_fn, false);
+ bpf_program__set_autoload(trace->progs.fentry_multi, false);
+ bpf_program__set_autoload(trace->progs.fexit_multi, false);
+
+ err = aggregate_ret_trace__load(trace);
+ ASSERT_EQ(err, -EOPNOTSUPP, "trace_fexit_load");
+
+ aggregate_ret_trace__destroy(trace);
+ }
+
+ if (test__start_subtest("trace_fentry_multi")) {
+ struct aggregate_ret_trace *trace = NULL;
+ struct bpf_link *link;
+
+ trace = aggregate_ret_trace__open();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(trace, "trace_fentry_multi_open"))
+ return;
+
+ bpf_program__set_autoload(trace->progs.fentry_bpf_testmod_aggregate_ret_fn, false);
+ bpf_program__set_autoload(trace->progs.fexit_bpf_testmod_aggregate_ret_fn, false);
+ bpf_program__set_autoload(trace->progs.fexit_multi, false);
+
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(aggregate_ret_trace__load(trace), "trace_fentry_multi_load"))
+ goto destroy_fentry_multi;
+
+ if (!tracing_multi_supported(trace->progs.fentry_multi)) {
+ test__skip();
+ goto destroy_fentry_multi;
+ }
+
+ link = bpf_program__attach_tracing_multi(trace->progs.fentry_multi, i128_pat, NULL);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "trace_fentry_multi_attach"))
+ goto destroy_fentry_multi;
+
+ ASSERT_OK(trigger_module_test_read(1), "trace_fentry_multi_trigger");
+ ASSERT_EQ(trace->bss->fentry_multi_hit, 1, "trace_fentry_multi_hit");
+
+ bpf_link__destroy(link);
+destroy_fentry_multi:
+ aggregate_ret_trace__destroy(trace);
+ }
+
+ if (test__start_subtest("trace_fexit_multi_reject")) {
+ struct aggregate_ret_trace *trace = NULL;
+ struct bpf_link *link;
+
+ trace = aggregate_ret_trace__open();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(trace, "trace_fexit_multi_open"))
+ return;
+
+ bpf_program__set_autoload(trace->progs.fentry_bpf_testmod_aggregate_ret_fn, false);
+ bpf_program__set_autoload(trace->progs.fexit_bpf_testmod_aggregate_ret_fn, false);
+ bpf_program__set_autoload(trace->progs.fentry_multi, false);
+
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(aggregate_ret_trace__load(trace), "trace_fexit_multi_load"))
+ goto destroy_fexit_multi;
+
+ if (!tracing_multi_supported(trace->progs.fexit_multi)) {
+ test__skip();
+ goto destroy_fexit_multi;
+ }
+
+ link = bpf_program__attach_tracing_multi(trace->progs.fexit_multi, i128_pat, NULL);
+ ASSERT_EQ(libbpf_get_error(link), -EOPNOTSUPP, "trace_fexit_multi_reject");
+ bpf_link__destroy(link);
+destroy_fexit_multi:
+ aggregate_ret_trace__destroy(trace);
+ }
+}
+
void test_aggregate_ret(void)
{
struct aggregate_ret_struct_c *skel_struct_c;
@@ -118,4 +244,6 @@ void test_aggregate_ret(void)
RUN_TESTS(aggregate_ret_func);
RUN_TESTS(aggregate_ret_kfunc);
+
+ test_tracing_attach_types();
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_trace.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_trace.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ff9fd4036121
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_trace.c
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2026 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+
+struct bpf_testmod_aggregate_ret {
+ __u64 lo;
+ __u64 hi;
+};
+
+int fentry_hit;
+int fexit_hit;
+int fentry_multi_hit;
+
+SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod:bpf_testmod_aggregate_ret_fn")
+int BPF_PROG2(fentry_bpf_testmod_aggregate_ret_fn, __u64, lo, __u64, hi)
+{
+ fentry_hit++;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("fexit/bpf_testmod:bpf_testmod_aggregate_ret_fn")
+int BPF_PROG2(fexit_bpf_testmod_aggregate_ret_fn, __u64, lo, __u64, hi,
+ struct bpf_testmod_aggregate_ret, ret)
+{
+ fexit_hit += ret.lo == lo && ret.hi == hi;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("fentry.multi/bpf_testmod:bpf_testmod_aggregate_ret_i128_fn")
+int BPF_PROG(fentry_multi)
+{
+ fentry_multi_hit++;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("fexit.multi/bpf_testmod:bpf_testmod_aggregate_ret_i128_fn")
+int BPF_PROG(fexit_multi)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
index c9e211d8a719..b558c538400e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
@@ -469,12 +469,34 @@ noinline void bpf_testmod_stacktrace_test_1(void)
}
int bpf_testmod_fentry_ok;
+u64 bpf_testmod_aggregate_ret_seen;
noinline int bpf_testmod_trampoline_count_test(void)
{
return 0;
}
+__noclone noinline struct bpf_testmod_aggregate_ret
+bpf_testmod_aggregate_ret_fn(u64 lo, u64 hi)
+{
+ struct bpf_testmod_aggregate_ret ret = {
+ .lo = lo,
+ .hi = hi,
+ };
+
+ bpf_testmod_aggregate_ret_seen += lo + hi;
+ return ret;
+}
+
+__noclone noinline __int128
+bpf_testmod_aggregate_ret_i128_fn(u64 lo, u64 hi)
+{
+ __int128 ret = ((__int128)hi << 64) | lo;
+
+ bpf_testmod_aggregate_ret_seen += lo + hi;
+ return ret;
+}
+
noinline ssize_t
bpf_testmod_test_read(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj,
const struct bin_attribute *bin_attr,
@@ -492,6 +514,8 @@ bpf_testmod_test_read(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj,
struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_5 struct_arg5 = {23, 24, 25, 26};
union bpf_testmod_union_arg_1 union_arg1 = { .arg = {1} };
union bpf_testmod_union_arg_2 union_arg2 = { .arg = {2, 3} };
+ struct bpf_testmod_aggregate_ret agg_ret;
+ __int128 agg_i128;
int i = 1;
while (bpf_testmod_return_ptr(i))
@@ -534,6 +558,14 @@ bpf_testmod_test_read(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj,
trace_bpf_testmod_test_nullable_bare_tp(NULL);
+ agg_ret = bpf_testmod_aggregate_ret_fn(len, off);
+ if (agg_ret.lo == U64_MAX && agg_ret.hi == U64_MAX)
+ goto out;
+
+ agg_i128 = bpf_testmod_aggregate_ret_i128_fn(len, off);
+ if (agg_i128 == (__int128)-1)
+ goto out;
+
/* Magic number to enable writable tp */
if (len == 64) {
struct bpf_testmod_test_writable_ctx writable = {
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.h
index 863fd10f1619..4dcbfd64de62 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.h
@@ -25,6 +25,11 @@ struct bpf_testmod_test_writable_ctx {
int val;
};
+struct bpf_testmod_aggregate_ret {
+ __u64 lo;
+ __u64 hi;
+};
+
/* BPF iter that returns *value* *n* times in a row */
struct bpf_iter_testmod_seq {
s64 value;
--
2.53.0-Meta
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 20:09 [PATCH bpf-next 00/12] bpf: Support 16-byte return values in the R0:R2 register pair Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/12] bpf: Factor check_global_ret_scalar_reg() out of the global return check Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/12] bpf: Add verifier support for 16-byte returns in R0:R2 Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:17 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 16:40 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-09 22:21 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10 4:57 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/12] bpf: Wire up JIT support for 16-byte kfunc returns Yonghong Song
2026-07-10 0:06 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/12] bpf: Track R2 of register-pair returns in precision backtracking Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:10 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 16:41 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10 0:31 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/12] bpf: Account R2 of register-pair returns in live register analysis Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:10 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 21:07 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10 5:06 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/12] bpf: Force JIT for programs using the R0:R2 register pair Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:10 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 3:15 ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-09 16:44 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-09 20:30 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10 5:07 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-09 22:27 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10 5:09 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/12] bpf: Reject >8 byte return values on return-reading trampoline paths Yonghong Song
2026-07-09 3:16 ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-09 16:52 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10 2:01 ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-09 23:08 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10 2:02 ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-10 5:27 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10 5:12 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/12] bpf: Enable 16-byte aggregate return types Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 19:40 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10 0:45 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10 5:29 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/12] selftests/bpf: Add C tests for 16-byte returns in R0:R2 Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 19:51 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:10 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 19:54 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10 1:19 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10 5:32 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/12] selftests/bpf: Add inline-asm and subprog tests for R0:R2 returns Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 19:57 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10 1:38 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10 5:35 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/12] Documentation/bpf: Document 16-byte kfunc return values in R0:R2 Yonghong Song
2026-07-10 0:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 00/12] bpf: Support 16-byte return values in the R0:R2 register pair Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10 6:00 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10 6:13 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10 15:18 ` Yonghong Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260708201036.2162000-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.