From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Hans Zhang" <18255117159@163.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev, Frank.Li@kernel.org,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/16] PCI: dwc: layerscape-ep: Use cached PCIe capability offset
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 15:25:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260720152513.7D4111F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260720150619.24733-5-18255117159@163.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Read-modify-write data race on PCIE_MISC_CONTROL_1_OFF hardware register.
--
--- Patch [4]: [PATCH v3 04/16] PCI: dwc: layerscape-ep: Use cached PCIe capability offset ---
commit 702ab6e16bc3343bb66237e6ea619ecc9e086c7f
Author: Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com>
PCI: dwc: layerscape-ep: Use cached PCIe capability offset
This commit replaces dw_pcie_find_capability() with dw_pcie_get_pcie_cap()
to cache and reuse the PCIe capability offset. This avoids re-searching
the capability list during probe and interrupt handling.
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> @@ -83,9 +82,6 @@ static irqreturn_t ls_pcie_ep_event_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> return IRQ_NONE;
>
> if (val & PEX_PF0_PME_MES_DR_LUD) {
> -
> - offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
> -
> /*
> * The values of the Maximum Link Width and Supported Link
> * Speed from the Link Capabilities Register will be lost
> * during link down or hot reset. Restore initial value
> * that configured by the Reset Configuration Word (RCW).
> */
> dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_en(pci);
> - dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, pcie->lnkcap);
> + dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, pci->pcie_cap + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP,
> + pcie->lnkcap);
> dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(pci);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but is there a potential data race
on the PCIE_MISC_CONTROL_1_OFF hardware register here?
The ls_pcie_ep_event_handler() function runs in hardirq context. When it
calls dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_en() and dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(), it performs an
unlocked read-modify-write on the register and then unconditionally clears
the enable bit:
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h:dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis() {
reg = PCIE_MISC_CONTROL_1_OFF;
val = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, reg);
val &= ~PCIE_DBI_RO_WR_EN;
dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, reg, val);
}
If the host triggers a Link Up event while the endpoint configuration is
taking place via configfs (which runs in process context), couldn't the
interrupt preempt the configuration thread?
If the preempted thread had just set PCIE_DBI_RO_WR_EN to write registers,
the interrupt would unconditionally clear it. When the preempted thread
resumes, its writes to read-only hardware registers (like Vendor ID or
BAR configurations) would be silently ignored by the controller, which
could lead to enumeration failure on the host.
Should this register access be protected by a lock, or should the
enable/disable functions save and restore the previous register state?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260720150619.24733-1-18255117159@163.com?part=4
_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Hans Zhang" <18255117159@163.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev, Frank.Li@kernel.org,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/16] PCI: dwc: layerscape-ep: Use cached PCIe capability offset
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 15:25:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260720152513.7D4111F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260720150619.24733-5-18255117159@163.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Read-modify-write data race on PCIE_MISC_CONTROL_1_OFF hardware register.
--
--- Patch [4]: [PATCH v3 04/16] PCI: dwc: layerscape-ep: Use cached PCIe capability offset ---
commit 702ab6e16bc3343bb66237e6ea619ecc9e086c7f
Author: Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com>
PCI: dwc: layerscape-ep: Use cached PCIe capability offset
This commit replaces dw_pcie_find_capability() with dw_pcie_get_pcie_cap()
to cache and reuse the PCIe capability offset. This avoids re-searching
the capability list during probe and interrupt handling.
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> @@ -83,9 +82,6 @@ static irqreturn_t ls_pcie_ep_event_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> return IRQ_NONE;
>
> if (val & PEX_PF0_PME_MES_DR_LUD) {
> -
> - offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
> -
> /*
> * The values of the Maximum Link Width and Supported Link
> * Speed from the Link Capabilities Register will be lost
> * during link down or hot reset. Restore initial value
> * that configured by the Reset Configuration Word (RCW).
> */
> dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_en(pci);
> - dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, pcie->lnkcap);
> + dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, pci->pcie_cap + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP,
> + pcie->lnkcap);
> dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(pci);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but is there a potential data race
on the PCIE_MISC_CONTROL_1_OFF hardware register here?
The ls_pcie_ep_event_handler() function runs in hardirq context. When it
calls dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_en() and dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(), it performs an
unlocked read-modify-write on the register and then unconditionally clears
the enable bit:
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h:dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis() {
reg = PCIE_MISC_CONTROL_1_OFF;
val = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, reg);
val &= ~PCIE_DBI_RO_WR_EN;
dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, reg, val);
}
If the host triggers a Link Up event while the endpoint configuration is
taking place via configfs (which runs in process context), couldn't the
interrupt preempt the configuration thread?
If the preempted thread had just set PCIE_DBI_RO_WR_EN to write registers,
the interrupt would unconditionally clear it. When the preempted thread
resumes, its writes to read-only hardware registers (like Vendor ID or
BAR configurations) would be silently ignored by the controller, which
could lead to enumeration failure on the host.
Should this register access be protected by a lock, or should the
enable/disable functions save and restore the previous register state?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260720150619.24733-1-18255117159@163.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-20 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-20 15:06 [PATCH v3 00/16] PCI: dwc: Cache PCIe capability offset and simplify drivers Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 01/16] PCI: dwc: Add pcie_cap field and helper in designware header Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:27 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:27 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 02/16] PCI: dwc: Use cached PCIe capability offset in core Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 03/16] PCI: dwc: imx6: Use cached PCIe capability offset Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 04/16] PCI: dwc: layerscape-ep: " Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:25 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-20 15:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 05/16] PCI: dwc: meson: " Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 06/16] PCI: dwc: rockchip: " Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 07/16] PCI: dwc: eswin: " Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 08/16] PCI: dwc: fu740: " Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 09/16] PCI: dwc: intel-gw: " Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 10/16] PCI: dwc: qcom-ep: " Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 11/16] PCI: dwc: qcom: " Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 12/16] PCI: dwc: sophgo: " Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 13/16] PCI: dwc: spacemit-k1: " Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 14/16] PCI: dwc: spear13xx: " Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 15/16] PCI: dwc: tegra194: " Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 16/16] PCI: dwc: ultrarisc: " Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:33 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260720152513.7D4111F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=18255117159@163.com \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.