From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Hans Zhang" <18255117159@163.com>
Cc: linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev, neil.armstrong@linaro.org,
Frank.Li@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/16] PCI: dwc: imx6: Use cached PCIe capability offset
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 15:28:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260720152833.1CA951F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260720150619.24733-4-18255117159@163.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] In Endpoint (EP) mode, the cached `pci->pcie_cap` offset is uninitialized and defaults to 0, causing `imx_pcie_start_link` and `imx_pcie_ltssm_enable` to read and corrupt the standard PCI configuration space header instead of the PCIe Link Capabilities register.
--
--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v3 03/16] PCI: dwc: imx6: Use cached PCIe capability offset ---
commit e88cd77b027a125e9713fc310c612c5158a23be1
Author: Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com>
PCI: dwc: imx6: Use cached PCIe capability offset
This commit updates the i.MX6 PCIe driver to use the cached pcie_cap
offset instead of dynamically finding the PCI_CAP_ID_EXP capability
during link start and LTSSM enablement.
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> index 98e1db751132a..74b28b4df4846 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> @@ -966,10 +966,10 @@ static void imx_pcie_ltssm_enable(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> const struct imx_pcie_drvdata *drvdata = imx_pcie->drvdata;
> - u8 offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(imx_pcie->pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
> + struct dw_pcie *pci = imx_pcie->pci;
> u32 tmp;
>
> - tmp = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(imx_pcie->pci, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP);
> + tmp = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, pci->pcie_cap + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP);
[Severity: High]
Is pci->pcie_cap guaranteed to be initialized here in Endpoint (EP) mode?
It looks like imx_add_pcie_ep() does not call dw_pcie_get_pcie_cap() after
the hardware is enabled. If pci->pcie_cap evaluates to 0 in EP mode, wouldn't
this read from offset 0x0C (Cache Line Size, Latency Timer, etc.) in the
standard PCI configuration space instead of the PCIe Link Capabilities register?
> phy_set_speed(imx_pcie->phy, FIELD_GET(PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS, tmp));
> if (drvdata->ltssm_mask)
[ ... ]
> @@ -995,7 +995,7 @@ static int imx_pcie_start_link(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> {
> struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie = to_imx_pcie(pci);
> struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> - u8 offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
> + u8 offset = pci->pcie_cap;
> u32 tmp;
> int ret;
[ ... ]
> dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_en(pci);
> tmp = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP);
> tmp &= ~PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS;
> tmp |= PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS_2_5GB;
> dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, tmp);
[Severity: High]
Can this corrupt the standard PCI configuration space header in EP mode?
Since offset is derived from pci->pcie_cap, if it remains uninitialized
(0) for endpoints, this write would target offset 0x0C in the standard PCI
header. This could corrupt the Cache Line Size, Latency Timer, Header Type,
and BIST registers.
Does the endpoint initialization path need a call to dw_pcie_get_pcie_cap()
before the link is started via dw_pcie_ep_start()?
> dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(pci);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260720150619.24733-1-18255117159@163.com?part=3
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Hans Zhang" <18255117159@163.com>
Cc: linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev, neil.armstrong@linaro.org,
Frank.Li@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/16] PCI: dwc: imx6: Use cached PCIe capability offset
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 15:28:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260720152833.1CA951F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260720150619.24733-4-18255117159@163.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] In Endpoint (EP) mode, the cached `pci->pcie_cap` offset is uninitialized and defaults to 0, causing `imx_pcie_start_link` and `imx_pcie_ltssm_enable` to read and corrupt the standard PCI configuration space header instead of the PCIe Link Capabilities register.
--
--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v3 03/16] PCI: dwc: imx6: Use cached PCIe capability offset ---
commit e88cd77b027a125e9713fc310c612c5158a23be1
Author: Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com>
PCI: dwc: imx6: Use cached PCIe capability offset
This commit updates the i.MX6 PCIe driver to use the cached pcie_cap
offset instead of dynamically finding the PCI_CAP_ID_EXP capability
during link start and LTSSM enablement.
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> index 98e1db751132a..74b28b4df4846 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> @@ -966,10 +966,10 @@ static void imx_pcie_ltssm_enable(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> const struct imx_pcie_drvdata *drvdata = imx_pcie->drvdata;
> - u8 offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(imx_pcie->pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
> + struct dw_pcie *pci = imx_pcie->pci;
> u32 tmp;
>
> - tmp = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(imx_pcie->pci, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP);
> + tmp = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, pci->pcie_cap + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP);
[Severity: High]
Is pci->pcie_cap guaranteed to be initialized here in Endpoint (EP) mode?
It looks like imx_add_pcie_ep() does not call dw_pcie_get_pcie_cap() after
the hardware is enabled. If pci->pcie_cap evaluates to 0 in EP mode, wouldn't
this read from offset 0x0C (Cache Line Size, Latency Timer, etc.) in the
standard PCI configuration space instead of the PCIe Link Capabilities register?
> phy_set_speed(imx_pcie->phy, FIELD_GET(PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS, tmp));
> if (drvdata->ltssm_mask)
[ ... ]
> @@ -995,7 +995,7 @@ static int imx_pcie_start_link(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> {
> struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie = to_imx_pcie(pci);
> struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> - u8 offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
> + u8 offset = pci->pcie_cap;
> u32 tmp;
> int ret;
[ ... ]
> dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_en(pci);
> tmp = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP);
> tmp &= ~PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS;
> tmp |= PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS_2_5GB;
> dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, tmp);
[Severity: High]
Can this corrupt the standard PCI configuration space header in EP mode?
Since offset is derived from pci->pcie_cap, if it remains uninitialized
(0) for endpoints, this write would target offset 0x0C in the standard PCI
header. This could corrupt the Cache Line Size, Latency Timer, Header Type,
and BIST registers.
Does the endpoint initialization path need a call to dw_pcie_get_pcie_cap()
before the link is started via dw_pcie_ep_start()?
> dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(pci);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260720150619.24733-1-18255117159@163.com?part=3
_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-20 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-20 15:06 [PATCH v3 00/16] PCI: dwc: Cache PCIe capability offset and simplify drivers Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 01/16] PCI: dwc: Add pcie_cap field and helper in designware header Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:27 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:27 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 02/16] PCI: dwc: Use cached PCIe capability offset in core Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 03/16] PCI: dwc: imx6: Use cached PCIe capability offset Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:28 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-20 15:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 04/16] PCI: dwc: layerscape-ep: " Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 05/16] PCI: dwc: meson: " Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 06/16] PCI: dwc: rockchip: " Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 07/16] PCI: dwc: eswin: " Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 08/16] PCI: dwc: fu740: " Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 09/16] PCI: dwc: intel-gw: " Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 10/16] PCI: dwc: qcom-ep: " Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 11/16] PCI: dwc: qcom: " Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 12/16] PCI: dwc: sophgo: " Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 13/16] PCI: dwc: spacemit-k1: " Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 14/16] PCI: dwc: spear13xx: " Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 15/16] PCI: dwc: tegra194: " Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 16/16] PCI: dwc: ultrarisc: " Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:06 ` Hans Zhang
2026-07-20 15:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 15:33 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260720152833.1CA951F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=18255117159@163.com \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.