All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Adrian Hunter" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org,
	"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 11/14] i3c: master: Reject IBI requests from non-IBI-capable devices
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 14:28:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260804142826.BBE161F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260804133810.184905-12-adrian.hunter@intel.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The workqueue `ibi->wq` is leaked on the error path if `master->ops->request_ibi(dev, req)` fails.
--

--- Patch [11]: [PATCH V3 11/14] i3c: master: Reject IBI requests from non-IBI-capable devices ---
commit a4ace89706edbc3219fece43aaef4d3c3e594148
Author: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>

i3c: master: Reject IBI requests from non-IBI-capable devices

This commit updates i3c_device_request_ibi() to verify that a device
advertises IBI support before attempting to set up IBI handling. If the
device lacks the I3C_BCR_IBI_REQ_CAP capability, it now returns early
with -EOPNOTSUPP.

> diff --git a/drivers/i3c/device.c b/drivers/i3c/device.c
> index 5e6df6de02834..f1ba363b22a17 100644
> --- a/drivers/i3c/device.c
> +++ b/drivers/i3c/device.c
> @@ -204,12 +204,14 @@ int i3c_device_request_ibi(struct i3c_device *dev,
>  		return ret;
>  
>  	i3c_bus_normaluse_lock(dev->bus);
> -	if (dev->desc) {
> +	if (!dev->desc) {
> +		ret = -ENOENT;
> +	} else if (!(dev->desc->info.bcr & I3C_BCR_IBI_REQ_CAP)) {
> +		ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +	} else {
>  		mutex_lock(&dev->desc->ibi_lock);
>  		ret = i3c_dev_request_ibi_locked(dev->desc, req);

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but since this patch interacts closely with IBI
request error handling, I noticed a potential resource leak in the underlying
i3c_dev_request_ibi_locked() function.

Does this code leak the newly allocated workqueue if the request fails?

drivers/i3c/master.c:i3c_dev_request_ibi_locked() {
    ...
    ibi->wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue(dev_name(i3cdev_to_dev(dev->dev)), WQ_MEM_RECLAIM);
    ...
    ret = master->ops->request_ibi(dev, req);
    if (ret) {
        kfree(ibi);
        dev->ibi = NULL;
    }
    
    return ret;
}

Should destroy_workqueue(ibi->wq) be called before kfree(ibi) on this error
path to prevent leaking the workqueue if a driver repeatedly fails to request
an IBI?

>  		mutex_unlock(&dev->desc->ibi_lock);
> -	} else {
> -		ret = -ENOENT;
>  	}
>  	i3c_bus_normaluse_unlock(dev->bus);
>

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260804133810.184905-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com?part=11

-- 
linux-i3c mailing list
linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-i3c

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Adrian Hunter" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org,
	"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 11/14] i3c: master: Reject IBI requests from non-IBI-capable devices
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 14:28:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260804142826.BBE161F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260804133810.184905-12-adrian.hunter@intel.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The workqueue `ibi->wq` is leaked on the error path if `master->ops->request_ibi(dev, req)` fails.
--

--- Patch [11]: [PATCH V3 11/14] i3c: master: Reject IBI requests from non-IBI-capable devices ---
commit a4ace89706edbc3219fece43aaef4d3c3e594148
Author: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>

i3c: master: Reject IBI requests from non-IBI-capable devices

This commit updates i3c_device_request_ibi() to verify that a device
advertises IBI support before attempting to set up IBI handling. If the
device lacks the I3C_BCR_IBI_REQ_CAP capability, it now returns early
with -EOPNOTSUPP.

> diff --git a/drivers/i3c/device.c b/drivers/i3c/device.c
> index 5e6df6de02834..f1ba363b22a17 100644
> --- a/drivers/i3c/device.c
> +++ b/drivers/i3c/device.c
> @@ -204,12 +204,14 @@ int i3c_device_request_ibi(struct i3c_device *dev,
>  		return ret;
>  
>  	i3c_bus_normaluse_lock(dev->bus);
> -	if (dev->desc) {
> +	if (!dev->desc) {
> +		ret = -ENOENT;
> +	} else if (!(dev->desc->info.bcr & I3C_BCR_IBI_REQ_CAP)) {
> +		ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +	} else {
>  		mutex_lock(&dev->desc->ibi_lock);
>  		ret = i3c_dev_request_ibi_locked(dev->desc, req);

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but since this patch interacts closely with IBI
request error handling, I noticed a potential resource leak in the underlying
i3c_dev_request_ibi_locked() function.

Does this code leak the newly allocated workqueue if the request fails?

drivers/i3c/master.c:i3c_dev_request_ibi_locked() {
    ...
    ibi->wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue(dev_name(i3cdev_to_dev(dev->dev)), WQ_MEM_RECLAIM);
    ...
    ret = master->ops->request_ibi(dev, req);
    if (ret) {
        kfree(ibi);
        dev->ibi = NULL;
    }
    
    return ret;
}

Should destroy_workqueue(ibi->wq) be called before kfree(ibi) on this error
path to prevent leaking the workqueue if a driver repeatedly fails to request
an IBI?

>  		mutex_unlock(&dev->desc->ibi_lock);
> -	} else {
> -		ret = -ENOENT;
>  	}
>  	i3c_bus_normaluse_unlock(dev->bus);
>

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260804133810.184905-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com?part=11

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-04 14:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-04 13:37 [PATCH V3 00/14] i3c: Support IBI-based system wakeup Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:37 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:37 ` [PATCH V3 01/14] i3c: master: Fix recursive locking during device registration Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:37   ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 14:51     ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 16:46   ` Frank Li
2026-08-04 16:46     ` Frank Li
2026-08-04 16:50     ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 16:50       ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 22:10       ` Frank Li
2026-08-04 22:10         ` Frank Li
2026-08-04 13:37 ` [PATCH V3 02/14] i3c: Fix unlocked dereference of dev->desc in i3c_device_get_supported_xfer_mode() Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:37   ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 15:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 15:09     ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 15:38     ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 15:38       ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:37 ` [PATCH V3 03/14] i3c: master: Do not treat master device as a duplicate target Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:37   ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:17   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 14:17     ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 16:50   ` Frank Li
2026-08-04 16:50     ` Frank Li
2026-08-04 17:33   ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 17:33     ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 04/14] i3c: master: Fix use-after-free of master->this Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38   ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:10   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 14:10     ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 15:50     ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 15:50       ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 05/14] i3c: Make dev->desc locking assumptions explicit Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38   ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 14:18     ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 18:08   ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 18:08     ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 06/14] i3c: master: Fix potential UAF in i3c_device_uevent() Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38   ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 15:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 15:08     ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 18:12   ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 18:12     ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 07/14] i3c: master: Fix potential UAF in i3c_device_match() Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38   ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 15:11   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 15:11     ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 17:14     ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 17:14       ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 08/14] i3c: master: Support IBI-based wakeup capability Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38   ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 14:05     ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 18:21   ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 18:21     ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 09/14] i3c: master: Report wakeup events for IBIs Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38   ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 15:10   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 15:10     ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 16:12     ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 16:12       ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 10/14] i3c: master: Add helper to query bus wakeup requirements Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38   ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 13:53     ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 18:52   ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 18:52     ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 11/14] i3c: master: Reject IBI requests from non-IBI-capable devices Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38   ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:28   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-04 14:28     ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 12/14] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci-pci: Propagate I3C wakeup requirements to PCI Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38   ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 15:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 15:05     ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 13/14] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Factor out i3c_hci_sysdev() Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38   ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 14:40     ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 19:28   ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 19:28     ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 14/14] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Advertise IBI wakeup capability Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38   ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:45   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 14:45     ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260804142826.BBE161F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.