All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Adrian Hunter" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org,
	"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 09/14] i3c: master: Report wakeup events for IBIs
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 15:10:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260804151019.BCAA81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260804133810.184905-10-adrian.hunter@intel.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

New issues:
- [High] Unprotected dereference of dev->dev in i3c_master_queue_ibi() leading to NULL pointer dereference or Use-After-Free during teardown.

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Race condition between hardware IBI interrupts and IBI teardown leading to Use-After-Free of dev->ibi.
--

--- Patch [9]: [PATCH V3 09/14] i3c: master: Report wakeup events for IBIs ---
commit 044b30e8813c466ee0c955f282a081170370a564
Author: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>

i3c: master: Report wakeup events for IBIs

When an IBI is queued for processing, this commit records a wakeup event
for the device if wakeup is enabled. It uses a 100 ms processing interval
to give the I3C device driver time to process the IBI.

> diff --git a/drivers/i3c/master.c b/drivers/i3c/master.c
> index e6b320da475e0..8c9e62e6f1469 100644
> --- a/drivers/i3c/master.c
> +++ b/drivers/i3c/master.c
> @@ -3398,6 +3401,9 @@ void i3c_master_queue_ibi(struct i3c_dev_desc *dev, struct i3c_ibi_slot *slot)
>  	if (!dev->ibi || !slot)
>  		return;
>  
> +	if (device_may_wakeup(&dev->dev->dev))
> +		pm_wakeup_event(&dev->dev->dev, I3C_WAKEUP_PROCESSING_TIME_MS);
> +

[Severity: High]
Is it possible for an IBI interrupt to fire concurrently with device
unregistration?

Looking at i3c_master_unregister_i3c_devs(), the teardown path sets
dev->dev to NULL:

drivers/i3c/master.c:i3c_master_unregister_i3c_devs() {
    ...
    i3cdev->dev->desc = NULL;
    put_device(&i3cdev->dev->dev);
    i3cdev->dev = NULL;
    ...
}

If an interrupt occurs during or just after this unregistration, could
dev->dev be NULL when device_may_wakeup() dereferences it here?

>  	atomic_inc(&dev->ibi->pending_ibis);
>  	queue_work(dev->ibi->wq, &slot->work);
>  }

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is there a race condition between hardware
IBI interrupts and IBI teardown leading to a use-after-free of dev->ibi?

In i3c_dev_disable_ibi_locked(), the code checks the pending_ibis counter:

drivers/i3c/master.c:i3c_dev_disable_ibi_locked() {
    ...
    if (atomic_read(&dev->ibi->pending_ibis))
        wait_for_completion(&dev->ibi->all_ibis_handled);
    ...
}

If a hardirq handler is already executing but has not yet called
i3c_master_queue_ibi() to increment pending_ibis, the teardown path might
assume no IBIs are pending and proceed to free dev->ibi in
i3c_dev_free_ibi_locked().

When the interrupted CPU resumes, wouldn't it execute this atomic_inc() and
queue_work() on the freed dev->ibi pointer since there is no
synchronize_irq() to drain active hardirqs?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260804133810.184905-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com?part=9

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Adrian Hunter" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org,
	"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 09/14] i3c: master: Report wakeup events for IBIs
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 15:10:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260804151019.BCAA81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260804133810.184905-10-adrian.hunter@intel.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

New issues:
- [High] Unprotected dereference of dev->dev in i3c_master_queue_ibi() leading to NULL pointer dereference or Use-After-Free during teardown.

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Race condition between hardware IBI interrupts and IBI teardown leading to Use-After-Free of dev->ibi.
--

--- Patch [9]: [PATCH V3 09/14] i3c: master: Report wakeup events for IBIs ---
commit 044b30e8813c466ee0c955f282a081170370a564
Author: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>

i3c: master: Report wakeup events for IBIs

When an IBI is queued for processing, this commit records a wakeup event
for the device if wakeup is enabled. It uses a 100 ms processing interval
to give the I3C device driver time to process the IBI.

> diff --git a/drivers/i3c/master.c b/drivers/i3c/master.c
> index e6b320da475e0..8c9e62e6f1469 100644
> --- a/drivers/i3c/master.c
> +++ b/drivers/i3c/master.c
> @@ -3398,6 +3401,9 @@ void i3c_master_queue_ibi(struct i3c_dev_desc *dev, struct i3c_ibi_slot *slot)
>  	if (!dev->ibi || !slot)
>  		return;
>  
> +	if (device_may_wakeup(&dev->dev->dev))
> +		pm_wakeup_event(&dev->dev->dev, I3C_WAKEUP_PROCESSING_TIME_MS);
> +

[Severity: High]
Is it possible for an IBI interrupt to fire concurrently with device
unregistration?

Looking at i3c_master_unregister_i3c_devs(), the teardown path sets
dev->dev to NULL:

drivers/i3c/master.c:i3c_master_unregister_i3c_devs() {
    ...
    i3cdev->dev->desc = NULL;
    put_device(&i3cdev->dev->dev);
    i3cdev->dev = NULL;
    ...
}

If an interrupt occurs during or just after this unregistration, could
dev->dev be NULL when device_may_wakeup() dereferences it here?

>  	atomic_inc(&dev->ibi->pending_ibis);
>  	queue_work(dev->ibi->wq, &slot->work);
>  }

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is there a race condition between hardware
IBI interrupts and IBI teardown leading to a use-after-free of dev->ibi?

In i3c_dev_disable_ibi_locked(), the code checks the pending_ibis counter:

drivers/i3c/master.c:i3c_dev_disable_ibi_locked() {
    ...
    if (atomic_read(&dev->ibi->pending_ibis))
        wait_for_completion(&dev->ibi->all_ibis_handled);
    ...
}

If a hardirq handler is already executing but has not yet called
i3c_master_queue_ibi() to increment pending_ibis, the teardown path might
assume no IBIs are pending and proceed to free dev->ibi in
i3c_dev_free_ibi_locked().

When the interrupted CPU resumes, wouldn't it execute this atomic_inc() and
queue_work() on the freed dev->ibi pointer since there is no
synchronize_irq() to drain active hardirqs?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260804133810.184905-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com?part=9

-- 
linux-i3c mailing list
linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-i3c

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-04 15:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-04 13:37 [PATCH V3 00/14] i3c: Support IBI-based system wakeup Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:37 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:37 ` [PATCH V3 01/14] i3c: master: Fix recursive locking during device registration Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:37   ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 14:51     ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 16:46   ` Frank Li
2026-08-04 16:46     ` Frank Li
2026-08-04 16:50     ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 16:50       ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 22:10       ` Frank Li
2026-08-04 22:10         ` Frank Li
2026-08-04 13:37 ` [PATCH V3 02/14] i3c: Fix unlocked dereference of dev->desc in i3c_device_get_supported_xfer_mode() Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:37   ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 15:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 15:09     ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 15:38     ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 15:38       ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:37 ` [PATCH V3 03/14] i3c: master: Do not treat master device as a duplicate target Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:37   ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:17   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 14:17     ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 16:50   ` Frank Li
2026-08-04 16:50     ` Frank Li
2026-08-04 17:33   ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 17:33     ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 04/14] i3c: master: Fix use-after-free of master->this Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38   ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:10   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 14:10     ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 15:50     ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 15:50       ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 05/14] i3c: Make dev->desc locking assumptions explicit Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38   ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 14:18     ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 18:08   ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 18:08     ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 06/14] i3c: master: Fix potential UAF in i3c_device_uevent() Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38   ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 15:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 15:08     ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 18:12   ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 18:12     ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 07/14] i3c: master: Fix potential UAF in i3c_device_match() Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38   ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 15:11   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 15:11     ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 17:14     ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 17:14       ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 08/14] i3c: master: Support IBI-based wakeup capability Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38   ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 14:05     ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 18:21   ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 18:21     ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 09/14] i3c: master: Report wakeup events for IBIs Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38   ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 15:10   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-04 15:10     ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 16:12     ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 16:12       ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 10/14] i3c: master: Add helper to query bus wakeup requirements Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38   ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 13:53     ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 18:52   ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 18:52     ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 11/14] i3c: master: Reject IBI requests from non-IBI-capable devices Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38   ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 14:28     ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 12/14] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci-pci: Propagate I3C wakeup requirements to PCI Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38   ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 15:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 15:05     ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 13/14] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Factor out i3c_hci_sysdev() Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38   ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 14:40     ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 19:28   ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 19:28     ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 14/14] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Advertise IBI wakeup capability Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38   ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:45   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 14:45     ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260804151019.BCAA81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.