From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Adrian Hunter" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org,
"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 07/14] i3c: master: Fix potential UAF in i3c_device_match()
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 15:11:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260804151107.333DF1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260804133810.184905-8-adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] Removal of the NULL check for `i3cdev->desc` introduces a guaranteed NULL pointer dereference in concurrent unregistration paths.
- [High] Unconditional access to `i3cdev->bus` in `i3c_device_match()` causes a Use-After-Free if the parent master controller has been freed.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Preexisting use-after-free race condition in AMD SBRMI (`sbrmi_i3c_probe`) accessing `i3cdev->desc` without holding the bus lock.
--
--- Patch [7]: [PATCH V3 07/14] i3c: master: Fix potential UAF in i3c_device_match() ---
commit d088359c0cccb56067d426e92d0a49f24376de53
Author: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
i3c: master: Fix potential UAF in i3c_device_match()
This commit protects access to i3cdev->desc with the bus normal-use lock
in i3c_device_match() to prevent a use-after-free during concurrent
descriptor replacement. It also removes the NULL check for i3cdev->desc,
assuming the lock guarantees validity.
> diff --git a/drivers/i3c/master.c b/drivers/i3c/master.c
> index 947ab3c681d5e..e7ea410078891 100644
> --- a/drivers/i3c/master.c
> +++ b/drivers/i3c/master.c
> @@ -347,8 +347,10 @@ static int i3c_device_match(struct device *dev, const struct device_driver *drv)
> i3cdev = dev_to_i3cdev(dev);
> i3cdrv = drv_to_i3cdrv(drv);
>
> - if (i3cdev->desc && i3cdev->desc->boardinfo)
> + i3c_bus_normaluse_lock(i3cdev->bus);
[Severity: High]
Does accessing i3cdev->bus here risk a use-after-free if the parent master
controller has been freed?
During unregistration, i3c_master_unregister() unregisters child devices,
and device_del() drops the child's reference to the parent by calling
put_device(parent). Once unregistration finishes, the parent platform device
unbinds and its devres frees the I3C master struct.
If a concurrent bus_for_each_dev() iterator (such as from driver registration)
holds a reference to the child device, the child outlives the parent. The
child's i3cdev->bus pointer would then remain pointing to the freed master
memory, leading to a use-after-free when acquiring the lock.
> + if (i3cdev->desc->boardinfo)
[Severity: High]
Could removing the NULL check for i3cdev->desc lead to a NULL pointer
dereference during concurrent unregistration?
In i3c_master_unregister_i3c_devs(), i3cdev->dev->desc = NULL; is set without
holding any bus locks.
If a concurrent driver matching thread invokes i3c_device_match(), it can
proceed in parallel because driver_match_device() operates outside
device_lock(). The thread acquires the bus lock, but since unregistration
doesn't hold it, it could read desc as NULL and crash when accessing
i3cdev->desc->boardinfo.
> static_addr_method = i3cdev->desc->boardinfo->static_addr_method;
> + i3c_bus_normaluse_unlock(i3cdev->bus);
>
> /*
> * SETAASA-based devices need not always have a matching ID since
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but I noticed a similar locking problem in
the AMD SBRMI driver.
In drivers/misc/amd-sbi/rmi-i2c.c:sbrmi_i3c_probe():
if (I3C_PID_INSTANCE_ID(i3cdev->desc->info.pid) != 1)
This dereferences i3cdev->desc without acquiring i3c_bus_normaluse_lock()
or using the safe i3c_device_get_info() API.
Since probe runs holding device_lock(), it is not mutually exclusive with
the bus maintenance write-lock used for descriptor replacement in
__i3c_master_add_i3c_dev_locked(). If a device's address is concurrently
re-assigned during DAA hot-join, could probe dereference a freed descriptor
when it resumes?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260804133810.184905-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com?part=7
--
linux-i3c mailing list
linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-i3c
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Adrian Hunter" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org,
"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 07/14] i3c: master: Fix potential UAF in i3c_device_match()
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 15:11:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260804151107.333DF1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260804133810.184905-8-adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] Removal of the NULL check for `i3cdev->desc` introduces a guaranteed NULL pointer dereference in concurrent unregistration paths.
- [High] Unconditional access to `i3cdev->bus` in `i3c_device_match()` causes a Use-After-Free if the parent master controller has been freed.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Preexisting use-after-free race condition in AMD SBRMI (`sbrmi_i3c_probe`) accessing `i3cdev->desc` without holding the bus lock.
--
--- Patch [7]: [PATCH V3 07/14] i3c: master: Fix potential UAF in i3c_device_match() ---
commit d088359c0cccb56067d426e92d0a49f24376de53
Author: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
i3c: master: Fix potential UAF in i3c_device_match()
This commit protects access to i3cdev->desc with the bus normal-use lock
in i3c_device_match() to prevent a use-after-free during concurrent
descriptor replacement. It also removes the NULL check for i3cdev->desc,
assuming the lock guarantees validity.
> diff --git a/drivers/i3c/master.c b/drivers/i3c/master.c
> index 947ab3c681d5e..e7ea410078891 100644
> --- a/drivers/i3c/master.c
> +++ b/drivers/i3c/master.c
> @@ -347,8 +347,10 @@ static int i3c_device_match(struct device *dev, const struct device_driver *drv)
> i3cdev = dev_to_i3cdev(dev);
> i3cdrv = drv_to_i3cdrv(drv);
>
> - if (i3cdev->desc && i3cdev->desc->boardinfo)
> + i3c_bus_normaluse_lock(i3cdev->bus);
[Severity: High]
Does accessing i3cdev->bus here risk a use-after-free if the parent master
controller has been freed?
During unregistration, i3c_master_unregister() unregisters child devices,
and device_del() drops the child's reference to the parent by calling
put_device(parent). Once unregistration finishes, the parent platform device
unbinds and its devres frees the I3C master struct.
If a concurrent bus_for_each_dev() iterator (such as from driver registration)
holds a reference to the child device, the child outlives the parent. The
child's i3cdev->bus pointer would then remain pointing to the freed master
memory, leading to a use-after-free when acquiring the lock.
> + if (i3cdev->desc->boardinfo)
[Severity: High]
Could removing the NULL check for i3cdev->desc lead to a NULL pointer
dereference during concurrent unregistration?
In i3c_master_unregister_i3c_devs(), i3cdev->dev->desc = NULL; is set without
holding any bus locks.
If a concurrent driver matching thread invokes i3c_device_match(), it can
proceed in parallel because driver_match_device() operates outside
device_lock(). The thread acquires the bus lock, but since unregistration
doesn't hold it, it could read desc as NULL and crash when accessing
i3cdev->desc->boardinfo.
> static_addr_method = i3cdev->desc->boardinfo->static_addr_method;
> + i3c_bus_normaluse_unlock(i3cdev->bus);
>
> /*
> * SETAASA-based devices need not always have a matching ID since
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but I noticed a similar locking problem in
the AMD SBRMI driver.
In drivers/misc/amd-sbi/rmi-i2c.c:sbrmi_i3c_probe():
if (I3C_PID_INSTANCE_ID(i3cdev->desc->info.pid) != 1)
This dereferences i3cdev->desc without acquiring i3c_bus_normaluse_lock()
or using the safe i3c_device_get_info() API.
Since probe runs holding device_lock(), it is not mutually exclusive with
the bus maintenance write-lock used for descriptor replacement in
__i3c_master_add_i3c_dev_locked(). If a device's address is concurrently
re-assigned during DAA hot-join, could probe dereference a freed descriptor
when it resumes?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260804133810.184905-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com?part=7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-04 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-04 13:37 [PATCH V3 00/14] i3c: Support IBI-based system wakeup Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:37 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:37 ` [PATCH V3 01/14] i3c: master: Fix recursive locking during device registration Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:37 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 14:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 16:46 ` Frank Li
2026-08-04 16:46 ` Frank Li
2026-08-04 16:50 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 16:50 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 22:10 ` Frank Li
2026-08-04 22:10 ` Frank Li
2026-08-04 13:37 ` [PATCH V3 02/14] i3c: Fix unlocked dereference of dev->desc in i3c_device_get_supported_xfer_mode() Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:37 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 15:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 15:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 15:38 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 15:38 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:37 ` [PATCH V3 03/14] i3c: master: Do not treat master device as a duplicate target Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:37 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 14:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 16:50 ` Frank Li
2026-08-04 16:50 ` Frank Li
2026-08-04 17:33 ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 17:33 ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 04/14] i3c: master: Fix use-after-free of master->this Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 14:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 15:50 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 15:50 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 05/14] i3c: Make dev->desc locking assumptions explicit Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 14:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 18:08 ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 18:08 ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 06/14] i3c: master: Fix potential UAF in i3c_device_uevent() Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 15:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 15:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 18:12 ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 18:12 ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 07/14] i3c: master: Fix potential UAF in i3c_device_match() Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 15:11 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-04 15:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 17:14 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 17:14 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 08/14] i3c: master: Support IBI-based wakeup capability Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 14:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 18:21 ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 18:21 ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 09/14] i3c: master: Report wakeup events for IBIs Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 15:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 15:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 16:12 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 16:12 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 10/14] i3c: master: Add helper to query bus wakeup requirements Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 13:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 18:52 ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 18:52 ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 11/14] i3c: master: Reject IBI requests from non-IBI-capable devices Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 14:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 12/14] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci-pci: Propagate I3C wakeup requirements to PCI Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 15:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 15:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 13/14] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Factor out i3c_hci_sysdev() Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 14:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 19:28 ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 19:28 ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-08-04 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 14/14] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Advertise IBI wakeup capability Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 13:38 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-04 14:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 14:45 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260804151107.333DF1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.